ARE WATCHING YOU
September 4, 2004
by: S.R. Shearer
"First the Nazis came for the Communists and
I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.
"Then they came for the Jews and I didn't speak up because I
wasn't a Jew.
"Then they came for the trade unionists and I didn't speak up
because I wasn't a trade unionist.
"Then they came for the Catholics and I didn't speak up because
I was a Protestant.
"Then they came for me, but by that time, no one was left to
- Pastor Martin Niemoeller
On March 28, 2004 a white cop killed an unarmed black man at a traffic
stop in Portland, Oregon. The cop's name was Jason Sery; the black man's
name was James Jahar Perez. Sery shot Perez three times in the chest,
killing him where he sat. The cop says Perez resisted arrest. Witnesses
say no. The coroner's report cited high levels of cocaine in Perez's
system, plus bags of "apparent drug material" found in his mouth and
in his pockets; but the Portland Oregonian and other local media
have since found evidence that throw the drug tests on Perez's corpse
into question and indicate that the drugs found in his mouth and in
his pockets were planted by the police. One thing's for sure, as Kristin
Williams reports for Counter Punch Magazine: "White Cops killed
an UNARMED black person - AGAIN!"
According to Williams, the shooting of Perez came less than a year
after a remarkably similar case. On May 5, 2003, Portland Police officer
Scott McCollister shot and killed Kendra James, a 21-year-old black
woman, as she attempted to leave a traffic stop. James was NOT
armed. Again, witnesses report that there was absolutely no reason for
the shooting. But - as in the case with Perez - witness testimony was
Then there was Jose Mejia, a Latino man who was boarding a public bus
in Portland when he suffered an epileptic seizure and became unresponsive.
The driver flagged down a passing squad car and the cops removed Mejia
from the bus; then - for no apparent reason - they began beating on
him in front of witnesses for being "non-responsive." [Of course he
was! - he was in an epileptic coma.]
was finally "arrested" and placed in a mental ward. Two days later he
escaped from his room, and refused to return, saying that the police
had had no business arresting him, and no reason for confining him to
a mental ward. He was simply an epileptic trying to cope with his affliction
- and he wanted to go home. When the police arrived, Mejia confronted
them with an aluminum rod he had removed from a door. Officer Jeffrey
Bell shot and killed Mejia in the hospital corridor. Astonished onlookers
at the hospital said that there was no justification for the killing:
Mejia was too far away from the police to be a threat; it was a cold-blooded
murder. But - as with the cases of Perez and James - witness testimony
The police MURDER of "people of color" seems to be "common
place" in Portland where, during the period January 2001 to April 2004,
the police shot 23 people and killed nine. Eleven of those the police
shot were blacks and Hispanics. That's almost 50 percent of those shot
in a town where "people of color" amount to no more than 20 percent
of the population. And one should bear in mind that all this occurred
in Portland, Oregon, a town considered by most to be "black friendly,"
not in "unfriendly" New York, Boston, Houston, or L.A. (all of which
have similar "whacked-out" statistics), which seems to indicate that
the violence the police in the United States are visiting on "people
of color" like Perez, James and Mejia is ubiquitous and pervasive, and
not at all confined to the nation's "big city ghettos" - and
the facts plainly indicate this!
POLICE BRUTALITY AGAINST THE BLACK COMMUNITY
example, ONE OUT OF EVERY THREE BLACK MALES are (or have been)
in jail in recent years, and that's not counting the huge number of
blacks who at any one given time are under some other form of "judicial
restraint" - estimated to be as high as twice the amount of black men
who are actually in jail. These facts pretty much correlate to what's
happening in Portland. Now unless one has bought into the LIE
perpetrated by racists like Richard Herrnstein, Charles Murray, Arthur
Jensen, William Schockley, Linda Gottfredson, Thomas Bouchard, and Richard
Lynn - i.e. that race predisposes one to crime - then this should be
a very SHOCKING statistic. [Please! - for those who have
not read our article on race and poverty, we URGE you
to read it; it is entitled "Racism and Right-Wing Christianity."]
These statistics don't make any sense, especially in light of the fact
that most blacks are in jail because of drug related crimes; but drug
usage in suburban white communities is actually higher than drug usage
in poor black neighborhoods. Why, then, are blacks being incarcerated
at such a higher rate? - unless they are being PURPOSEFULLY
targeted for other reasons.
BLACKS ARE BEING TARGETED
And that seems to be EXACTLY what's happening - the fact
that both Kendra James and James Perez were killed during traffic stops
lends credence to this belief: According to the police's own data, black
drivers are 2.6 times more likely to be pulled over than are white drivers.
These numbers, according to Williams, resonate with Perez's own record.
Since 1994, he received 19 citations. In eight of these cases (42%)
the only charges were driving without a license or with no insurance
- VIOLATIONS THAT WOULD NOT BE EVIDENT PRIOR TO THE STOP, WHICH MEANS,
OF COURSE, THAT PEREZ WAS BEING PURPOSEFULLY TARGETED BECAUSE HE WAS
The tendency of most "mainstream" civil rights advocates is to chalk
up what's happening to "nothing more" than racism run amuck - a crude
repeat of Jim Crow harassment that's been going on in the United States
since time immemorial. But there seems to be more than just that that's
involved here. Something different! Something NEW! - and
the evidence seems to bear this suspicion out. THE "OUT-OF-WHACK"
INCARCERATION STATISTICS FOR BLACKS AS OPPOSED TO WHITES IS A BRAND
It's not something that's been going on for a very long time. While
that may surprise you, that's, nonetheless, what the Washington D.C.-based
Sentencing Project has discovered. For instance, in 1954 there were
98,000 black males in prison; by 1974 that figure had crept up to 153,000;
by 1994, it had grown fourfold to 635,000; and in 2002, it had risen
to a record high of 884,500 - and, again, that's not counting those
blacks who are on "work-release" or parole.
TREATING BLACKS AS "ENEMY COMBATANTS"
other words, something happened in the late 1970s and early 1980s that
led to the EXPLOSION of the black incarceration rate in
the United States - AND WHAT HAPPENED BODES ILL FOR WHITES IN THIS
COUNTRY. That time frame is precisely when the elites launched their
"War on Drugs" which was nothing more than an euphemism for a CLASS
WAR against the black community. The elite's war on the black
community was necessitated by Martin Luther King's efforts to transform
the Civil Rights Crusade into a "Poor People's Crusade" against the
was killed for this, and the black community that he had led was targeted
for destruction using the "War on Drugs" as the means to first CRIMINALIZE
blacks, and then DESTROY them. [Please see our article
for what happened to King, "The Utility of Police Brutality in the Elite's
War Against the Poor;" please also see our article "MK-ULTRA and the
Search for the Manchurian Candidate."]
Specifically, what the supposed "War on Drugs" allowed the elites to
do is treat the black community's so-called "revolutionary" organizations
(e.g., the Black Panther Party, the Congress for Racial Equality (CORE),
the Black Muslims, etc.) as CRIMINAL SYNDICATES, surveil their
memberships, INCARCERATE their leadership, and generally
treat blacks as "ENEMY COMBATANTS," and black neighborhoods as
"ENEMY TERRITORY" to be OCCUPIED and BRUTALIZED
much in the way the Nazis occupied and brutalized the Ukrainians, the
Poles, the Russians, the Greeks, etc. during the Second World War. How
else can one rationally explain the skewered statistics insofar as black
incarceration rates are concerned? How else can one rationally explain
what happened to Kendra James, Jose Mejia and James Perez in Portland,
WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH ME?
The fact is, to call what's being done to the black and Latino communities
in the United States "policing" is simply not honest. Of course, you
might ask, What does this have to do with me? I'm not black and I don't
live in the ghetto. I feel sorry for these people, but their plight
doesn't really affect me.
Oh really? - well, whether white Americans realize it or not, they
are only an hair's breadth away from being treated in EXACTLY THE
SAME FASHION as blacks have been treated in the elite's new "War
TYRANNY BEGINS AT THE FRINGES
AND WORKS ITS WAY INTO THE CENTER
Brothers and sisters, listen to me here: Tyranny normally begins on
the fringes of society and is first directed against those who do not
possess the power to defend themselves (such as blacks in this country
and Jews in Nazi Germany), and then it works its way in towards the
center; it first targets those members of the community that nobody
cares about, and then moves its way up the "food chain." If we are to
arrest the spread of tyranny, we must attempt to do so early on; otherwise
we will find ourselves engaged in an "exercise in futility."
This is what Pastor Martin Niemoeller tried to convey many years ago
when he talked about his experience in Hitler's Third Reich:
"First the Nazis came for the Communists and I didn't speak up
because I wasn't a Communist.
"Then they came for the Jews and I didn't speak up because I wasn't
"Then they came for the trade unionists and I didn't speak up because
I wasn't a trade unionist.
"Then they came for the Catholics and I didn't speak up because
I was a Protestant.
"Then they came for me, but by that time, no one was left to speak
Sadly, the process that Pastor Niemoeller describes here has been going
on in the United States for some time now and has probably already progressed
to the point where it is now unstoppable - and if you don't recognize
what's been happening, it's probably because you are white, middle-class,
have a relatively good education, and you live in the suburbs. But,
as we have already indicated, if you're black and if you live in South-Central
L.A., or in the Bronx, or in Liberty City, Florida you know perfectly
well what we're talking about.
NOW IT'S THE TURN OF THE WHITE COMMUNITY
truth is, for over thirty years, whites have stood aside while members
of the black community have been treated like "enemy combatants" - just
as Niemoeller and his friends stood aside and watched as the Nazis rounded
up first the Communists, then the Jews, then the trade unionists, and
so forth - pretending all the while that they (i.e., the whites) didn't
see what was happening to the black community, though what was occurring
was plain enough to see: THAT BLACK WORKERS WERE BEING MERCILESSLY
DISGORGED FROM THE ECONOMY AND THEIR COMMUNITY CRUELLY ATTACKED UNDER
THE RUBRIC OF THE SO-CALLED "WAR ON DRUGS." [Again, please see our
article on what's been happening to the black community, "The Utility
of Police Brutality in the Elite's War Against the Poor."]
Now it's the turn of the white community to suffer the way the black
community has been suffering. And why is that? - because, as the elites
ship more and more jobs off to cheap labor factories (i.e., "out-source"
them) in China, Indonesia, etc. (and pocket the difference between what
they would have paid American workers as opposed to the pittance
they are now paying workers in India, Thailand, etc.), THERE ARE
SIMPLY NOT ENOUGH MEANINGFUL JOBS BEING GENERATED IN THE UNITED
STATES FOR MOST WHITES TO STAY ANCHORED ANY LONGER TO THE MIDDLE CLASS.
WHITES ARE NOW BEING DISGORGED FROM THE
ECONOMY JUST AS BLACKS WERE THIRTY YEARS AGO
workers in the United States are discovering what black workers found
out thirty years ago: that their welfare is superfluous to the elite's
prosperity - a fact that is being driven home to white youths as they
graduate from college saddled with college-related debt and little chance
of paying it off with the "dead-end" jobs available to them now - and
no chance of bankrupting against these debts. [Please see our article,
"Making Men Cogs in a Machine: The Reformation of the Bankruptcy Laws."]
while this may not yet be happening to college grads at elite schools
like Harvard, Yale, Princeton and Stanford, it surely has been occurring
to the sons and daughters of the middle class as they graduate from
schools like Ohio State, Indiana State, Iowa State, the University of
Washington, Arizona State, etc. THIS IS "GLOBALIZATION" WRIT LARGE
ON THE BACKS OF AMERICA'S YOUTH.
As a result, it's no accident that white college young people make
up the great majority of those who have been at the forefront of the
anti-globalization demonstrations in Seattle, Philadelphia, Washington
D.C., New York, etc., just as it was no accident that white young people
(mostly college-age youth) made up the bulk of the anti-war movement
in the 1960s. It was their ox that was being goaded by the draft in
the 1960s and early '70s, just as it is their ox that is being goaded
today by the elite's policy of "outsourcing." [Please see our articles
on these demonstrations - Seattle: "The WTO and the Masses;" Miami:
"The Utility of Police Brutality in the Elite's War Against the Poor;"
and Cancun: "Lee Kyang: the Rich and the Poor! America and God."]
THE ELITES: TURNING THEIR WRATH ON THE
SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF THE MIDDLE CLASS
opposing the process of globalization that the elites have unleashed
on the world (and - ipso facto - in trying to save a place for
themselves in the middle class), these white youths have come to constitute
a genuine threat to the elite's ability to continue to plunder the rest
of the world on behalf of Corporate America.
Indeed, there is a real danger that if the elites don't act soon, they
could - like other elites before them - be inundated. The truth is,
with the passage of time, the anti-globalist demonstrations of the "Great
Unwashed" are growing larger and ever more ominous, making the meetings
of the world's "moneyed worthies" tiresome and tedious affairs rather
than the cheery, joyous proceedings the elites think they should be
(e.g., the meetings of the G-8, the World Bank, the IMF, the WTO, Davos,
etc.); meetings which - thanks to the disruptions of the so-called "rabble"
- now have to be held behind barbed wire and in obscure locations like
Qatar. The elites cannot let this kind of defiance go on forever unchecked.
That's what the elite's so-called "War on Terrorism" (i.e., "Homeland
Security") is all about. Like the elite's fake "War on Drugs" - which,
again, is nothing more than a fig leaf behind which the elites have
waged "CLASS WARFARE" against the black community for
thirty years - "Homeland Security" is little more than a facade behind
which the elites are planning a war of intimidation against those who
oppose globalization; specifically, the sons and daughters of America's
white middle class.
HOMELAND SECURITY: A TROJAN HORSE
what Douglas Valentine, author of the book, The Phoenix Program,
thinks; he writes:
"... HOMELAND SECURITY IS, SIMPLY STATED, A TROJAN HORSE
through which Bush will unleash his ideological stormtroopers
on America and exploit his ill-gotten power to achieve personal and
political gain." [Please see our article on this matter, "$3 Trillion
and the Bush, Kerry Campaigns for the Presidency: What It Portends
for Us as Christians."]
And it's happening even now; indeed, the restrictions imposed on Americans
through the oppressive instumentalities of "Homeland Security" have
already had a telling effect: our right to travel where and when we
please without being hampered has been circumscribed; we are increasingly
being surveilled in all aspects of our lives; our police forces have
been "militarized;" the government has arrogated unto itself the right
to wiretap our phones, monitor our email and internet usage, search
our homes and businesses, and seize documents all without a warrant;
the government can now arrest people without charges and hold them indefinitely
(i.e., "disappear" people); and the list goes on and on.
These acts, taken together, have established - as two-time Nobel Prize
winner Johan Galtung has said - a "LEGALLY CRIMINAL SOCIAL STRUCTURE"
in the United States. By "legally criminal" Galtung means that what
Bush and his elite cronies have been doing is legalizing their otherwise
criminal acts of oppression directed against the American population.
WHAT HOMELAND SECURITY IS REALLY ALL ABOUT
don't believe it? Well, ask yourself, Why do the rights of ordinary
citizens have to be constricted if the purpose of these restrictions
is merely to contain the activities of Al Qaida and the rest
of Osama bin Laden's minions? Why is it that the government finds it
necessary to roll back the rights of individual American citizens if
all the government is targeting is Muslim extremists? The answer, of
course, is that Muslim extremists are not the elite's real targets.
Valentine suggests the real reason:
"Homeland Security is [nothing more than] an euphemism for 'INTERNAL
SECURITY' [i.e., the establishment of a 'National
Security State']." [Again, please see our article, "$3 Trillion and
the Bush, Kerry Campaigns for the Presidency: What It Portends for
Us as Christians."]
is PRECISELY what the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
thinks as well. In a chilling report released recently (August, 2004)
entitled, "The Surveillance-Industrial Complex: How the American Government
Is Conscripting Business and Individuals in the Construction of a Surveillance
Society," the ACLU documents exactly how the elites are planning to
keep tabs on dissidents in the United States, and - if necessary - terrorize
them into compliance to their wishes much as they have been doing for
years to the black community in the U.S., and to the populations of
America's client-states. [Please see our article, "The Horror of John
Dimitri Negroponte and Everything He Represents."]
The strategy that the elites have devised to protect themselves from
the fury of the "mob" (i.e., those who oppose them) calls for the creation
of a "Surveillance Society" not unlike Hitler's Third Reich where everyone
is enlisted as WATCHERS, and everyone is WATCHED.
Anthony D. Romero, the American Civil Liberties Union's Executive Director,
"Acting under the broad mandate of the 'War on Terrorism', the U.S.
security establishment is making a systematic effort to extend its
surveillance capacity by PRESSING THE PRIVATE SECTOR INTO SERVICE
TO REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF [OTHER] AMERICANS. These efforts
... run the gamut from old-fashioned efforts to recruit individuals
as eyes and ears for the authorities, to the construction of vast
computerized networks that systematically feed the government a steady
stream of information about our activities."
A MASSIVE EFFORT
The ACLU labels this -
"... a MASSIVE effort ... to turn regular Americans
into ... government MONITORS who, pressed by constant
urgings for vigilance and suspicion ... are asked to report to the
authorities anything they think is 'unusual or suspicious' ... The
new warnings are enormously vague and broad, yet frightening and intense.
Unlike 'wanted' posters and other traditional public appeals, they
are based not on crimes that have already been committed, but on the
prospect or suspicion that an individual might be planning something
bad ... The government's constant exhortations to micro-vigilance
... will create an atmosphere of CONFORMISM and mistrust
that encourages abuse and divides Americans from one another ..."
just how massive this effort is can be surmised from the government's
initial and rather clumsy attempt to create such a system: The January
2002 effort by John Ashcroft's Justice Department to impose on the American
public the now "defunct" program called the "Terrorism Information and
Prevention System," or TIPS. [Please see our articles, "John Ashcroft,
Theodore Olson and the New National Security State."]
Billed as a "national system for concerned workers to report suspicious
activity," the program would have recruited "millions of truckers, letter
carriers, train conductors, ship captains, utility employees" and "others"
as government informants. The recruitment of utility workers and "others"
(e.g., plumbers, electricians, pest control operators, computer repair
people, etc.) was particularly insidious - it would have left, in the
words of the ACLU report -
"Homeowners to wonder if anything in their home might draw suspicion
whenever a cable or utility worker comes in to do a repair."
One can only imagine the "scurrying about" this program would have
necessitated whenever home, cable, or computer repairs were needed:
left-wing magazines would have to be hidden, hard disks on computers
would have to be removed, posters on walls might have to be taken down,
the children would have to be coached on what not to say, ad infinitum,
The proposed scope of this project was stunning - it would have recruited,
in its pilot program alone, one million informants in just 10 cities
- or 1 IN EVERY 24 AMERICANS LIVING IN THOSE CITIES.
THIS IS AN OLD GESTAPO TRICK
The ACLU report continues:
"The recruitment of informants [i.e., WATCHERS, both
individuals and corporations] for particular investigations has long
been a key tool of law enforcement, BUT ONLY UNDER THE MOST OPPRESSIVE
GOVERNMENTS HAVE INFORMANTS EVER BECOME A WIDESPREAD, CENTRAL FEATURE
OF LIFE [as they are now becoming in the United States]."
"The East German Stasi, for example, not only employed 91,000 full-time
workers, but also recruited from among the citizenry more than 170,000
non-professional informants, or as many as one in every 50 citizens,
to spy and report on their fellow citizens. Stasi agents even used
blackmail and other pressure tactics to get people to spy on their
own family members." [NOTE: it should be noted that
the ratio of "WATCHERS" to "WATCHED" in
the system that TIPS was aiming for was one in every 24 - more than
double the Stasi ratio - and there is no indication that this ratio
has been abandoned by any of the more sophisticated successor systems
to TIPS that the government has now set up.]
The Stasi system was patterned after the Gestapo (Geheime Staats
Polizei) of Hitler's Third Reich, an ever present system of surveillance
designed to - as Edward Crankshaw describes it - "... create a LEGEND
OF TERROR ..." calculated to paralyze people with fear and prevent
them from speaking out against the government.
Heinrich Mueller, chief of Hitler's Gestapo, commenting on the efficacy
of this kind of system, said that there is -
"... nothing quite as efficient as an internal spy system (i.e.,
citizens spying on other citizens) for isolating the individual by
making it impossible for anybody to trust anybody else."
That's what Crankshaw thinks as well; he reiterates what Mueller says
almost word for word:
"There is nothing like the voluntary informer for creating a general
atmosphere of unease and apprehension ... his information is usually
valueless in any specific sense; but since every human being at some
time commits some indiscretion, he enables the secret-police to appear
where it is least expected and give the desired impression of possessing
an all-seeing eye."
THE CITIZEN CORPS: ORGANIZING
"AMERICAN WATCHERS" GESTAPO-STYLE
This is especially true when one takes this system of voluntary WATCHERS
and organizes it hierarchically, as the Department of Homeland
Security is now doing through a new government program called "CAT
EYES" (the Community Anti-Terrorism Training Institute). The
program is centered on doubling the size of the nation's old "Neighborhood
Watch" programs (which were loosely organized, independent neighborhood
groups on the "look-out" for burglars, robbers, and other "home-intruders")
and transforming them into HIGHLY ORGANIZED, TIGHTLY-CONTROLLED
instruments of government surveillance replete with "Block Watchers,"
"Block Captains," "Neighborhood Coordinators," "District Coordinators,"
etc. who will - according to the institute's literature - "act as the
eyes and ears of law enforcement and report any suspicious activity
[relating to terrorism]" to the government. The new transformed "Neighborhood
Watch" program is called the "CITIZEN CORPS."
This is EXACTLY what the Nazis did in Germany in the
1930s where, according to Crankshaw, the Gestapo organized a similar
system of groups into -
"... a cell system which enrolled quantities of ordinary citizens
as honorary part-time members of the Gestapo ... Thus there was the
Blockwart, the concierge, who had to report on the activities
of every tenant in his apartment building [and so on from apartment
building to block warden, to neighborhood warden, to ward captain,
to district warden, ad nauseum until the whole city was covered
by a hierarchical system of Nazi 'WATCHERS'] ..."
According to the ACLU report, all tips received from the "CITIZEN
CORPS" - however raw -
"... will be cross-referenced through federal, state, and local databases.
There is no mention of whether the name of an innocent person who
is the subject of a tip will ever be purged from the database. In
fact, according to the report, it is far from clear what any of these
programs do with information about 'suspicious' individuals that they
receive - how reports are recorded, shared and stored in domestic
intelligence or law enforcement databases or what is done to ensure
that innocent individuals who are the subjects of raw suspicions and
rumors will not have a permanent black mark associated with their
names in some government database."
CHANGING ONE'S BEHAVIOR AND PSYCHOLOGY
The ultimate purpose behind all this WATCHING is to create,
as Valentine suggests, "... ANXIETY ..." in the American population,
and most especially among those who might otherwise oppose the elite's
American New World Order System; a pervasive atmosphere of -
"... CONSTANT UNCERTAINTY whenever people are in a situation
where an informant might be present, enormously amplifying the effect
of government surveillance on individual behavior and psychology."
And no doubt about it, this kind of "UNCERTAINTY" has
the capacity to change one's behavior and psychology, that's for sure
- after all, who wants to be targeted as a "terrorist suspect" these
days? [That's what the elites are calling those who in any way oppose
them: "TERRORISTS."] The consequences are enormous insofar
as one's job, one's family, one's "credit worthiness," etc. are concerned.
One's credit worthiness? Yes! - even one's "credit worthiness," as one
so-called FBI "suspect" found out recently when he received a letter
from his bank after his name (i.e., "Algabri") "popped up" on a "government
WATCH list," a letter which read in part:
"We regret to inform you that we have decided that it is not in our
best interest to continue your banking relationship with us." [Letter
from Fleet Bank to Algabri, an American citizen.]
PROLIFERATING FROM LIST TO LIST
Algabri was unable to ascertain how or even why his name appeared on
the list. Moreover, as Algabri found out, once one's name "shows up"
on a "government WATCH list" it appears impossible to
remove it. Not only that, it seems that one's name will then begin proliferating
on other "WATCH lists" - jumping from one list to the
next like some kind of deadly virus jumping from one cell in the body
to the next, spreading like a cancer until all the cells of the body
are infected, and the "host" collapses and dies.
And it's not just Algabri. Take what happened to those whose names
appeared on a "Project Lookout" list, a program that is extant today.
The list was circulated by the FBI among a supposedly restricted number
of corporations who shared and re-shared the list with other corporations.
As a result, the list quickly took on a life of its own - with damaging
consequences for those on it: The companies started checking their customers
against the list and began discontinuing their relationship with those
who appeared on it.
Unfortunately, the list was later discovered to be riddled with inaccuracies
and contained the names of many people with whom the Bureau simply wanted
to talk, but by the time the mistakes were found, there was no way to
remove innocent people from the list because the distribution had spun
beyond the FBI's control. The ACLU reports that -
"No one knows how many innocent people have been denied jobs or suffered
other harm because of the list."
To make matters worse, the ACLU reports that most people who appear
on a government WATCH list don't even know that they are
on it - until, that is, they begin to suffer the kind of consequences
described above. And even then, they can only surmise their presence
on the list - the government will never admit to it. As a result, there
is no recourse for those who have been placed on such lists: one is
left with only vague suspicions and a sense of utter helplessness. And
don't think - even for a minute - that the government wants to mitigate
what's occurring here. It doesn't! The fact is, it's precisely this
kind of ambiguity and insecurity that the government is aiming to instill
in the population - THE KIND OF VAGUENESS THAT MAKES PEOPLE THINK
THAT AT ANY MOMENT A SHADOW CAN STEP OUT OF THE NIGHT AND SNATCH THEIR
RETREATING INTO A LIFE OF CONFORMITY
Given these facts, imagine the lengths to which one might go (i.e.,
the kind of life-altering changes one might decide to take) in order
NOT to elicit the suspicion of some "secret informant"
lurking in the shadows; for example, friends that one might feel it
best to avoid now because of their political beliefs; books and magazines
one wouldn't want to be caught reading anymore; discussions one might
want to avoid participating in; clubs and organizations one might feel
it best to "drop out of," ad nauseum - after all, who knows who
might be WATCHING? Your neighbor next door? Your co-worker
on the job? Your golf partner? Your sister or brother? Even your own
spouse? [And, sadly, that - i.e., spouses spying on their spouses -
occurred much more often than one might imagine in the old Stasi-controlled
state of East Germany.]
The truth is, those who are given to WATCHING others
are normally suspicious, bigoted and narrow-minded people by nature.
Better to be safe than sorry, and avoid ALL situations
which might draw the suspicion of these WATCHERS, which
means retreating back into a very bland, non-controversial life-style
and keeping your mouth shut. Nobody wants to receive a letter like Algabri
received! How does one operate in society, at least in a modern context,
if one cannot find a bank willing to offer him credit, let alone refusing
to let him open a simple bank account? No, these questions are real-life
questions; they are not hypothetical ones; real people are involved.
Algabri is a REAL person, and so are those whose names
appeared on the "Project Lookout" WATCH list (see above).
And it's not just "Project Lookout," but countless other similar programs
like "Eagle Eyes," "Talon," "Cat Eyes," "Marine Watch," "Highway Watch,"
"Real Estate Watch," "Florida TIPS," ad nauseum).
YES! - YOU ARE BEING WATCHED
Yes, dear Christian, YOU are being WATCHED!
Moreover, the government wants you to know that you are being WATCHED;
it wants you to know that it is surveilling your every move; a ubiquitous,
methodical WATCHING directed at creating, as Valentine
says (and as we have already suggested) -
A PERVASIVE SENSE OF MISTRUST THAT PREVENTS CITIZENS FROM SHARING
THEIR COMPLAINTS WITH EACH OTHER, GAINING STRENGTH FROM CONNECTING
WITH OTHERS OF LIKE MIND AND CHALLENGING THOSE WHO ARE IN POWER."
the government is hoping for is that all this WATCHING
will induce in you a sense of anxiety so great THAT IT WILL CAUSE
YOU TO BETRAY YOUR CONVICTIONS, especially insofar as those convictions
are at odds with the purposes of the state, and - insofar as Christians
are concerned - as you find yourself at odds with the church's apostate
alliance with America's New World Order System. [Please see our article
on the "interplay" between the Religious Right in this country and the
state, "A Woman Riding a Beast Going Forth Conquering and to Conquer;"
please also see chapter 15 of the Antipas Papers, "The
Woman of Revelation 17;" finally, please see our article, "Political
just how broad a net the government is casting here to "catch" such
dissidents is evidenced by the wording of one government WATCH
program called "Eagle Eyes:"
"ANYONE can recognize elements of potential terror
planning when they see it."
My heavens, what's that mean? Does that mean someone who doesn't fly
the flag high enough on the front of his home? Someone who doesn't sing
the National Anthem with enough gusto at a public event? Someone who
questions the role of the American military in Iraq? Someone who speaks
out on the way American multinational companies "carry on" in the Third
World? MAYBE EVEN SOMEONE WHO DOESN'T ATTEND CHURCH REGULARLY?
It could mean all these things - and one must remember here, it's not
so much "left-wingers" who will be tattling on their neighbors, but
"patriots" committed to the concept of America as God's "REDEEMER
are the people - i.e., the people who believe that America is God's
"REDEEMER NATION" (not "left-wingers") - who support Bush's
New World Order System, people like Paul Crouch, Jack Hayford, Charles
Stanley, D. James Kennedy, Tim LaHaye, the late John Wimber, Juan Carlos
Ortiz, C. Peter Wagner, Beverley LaHaye, Ern Baxter, Kenneth Copeland,
the late Kenneth Hagin, Oral Roberts, Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell,
Chuck Colson, David Yonggi Cho, Robert Stearns, Mike Bickle, Reuven
Doron, Che Ahn, Frank Hammond, Cindy Jacobs, Bill Hamon, John Eckhardt,
Bobbie Byerly, Dutch Sheets, Jim Goll, John Paul Jackson, James Ryle,
Frank Damazio, Ed Silvoso, Carlos Annacondia, Claudio Freidzon, Roger
Mitchell, Ted Haggart, Paul Cain, Chuck Pierce, Rick Joyner, Kingsley
Fletcher, Jim Laffoon, Barbara Wentroble, ad infinitum, ad nauseum.
[Please see our articles, "A Woman Riding a Beast Going forth Conquering
and to Conquer," and "Today's Church" Making Zombies out of Christians
- The Prophets and Apostles Movement."]
you fail to please these WATCHERS (see above), and - as
the pathology of WATCHING really takes hold, and the alliance
between the church and the state strengthens - if you fail to attend
church regularly (or, for those of you who have not yet "converted"
and found a church to attend regularly, if you fail to "convert" and
find such a church), and if you fail to shout out the appropriate "amens"
and "hallelujahs" during your pastor's sermons at the appropriate places
and at the appropriate times (don't laugh; this isn't funny; you're
going to have to learn to do that along with all the accompanying "holy
handwaving" and "ecstatic staring" that goes along with it if you are
going to survive), your name will eventually find itself on someone's
WATCH list; and from there onto government data bases;
and from there onto private corporate WATCH lists which
will then be shared and re-shared with other corporations; your credit
will dry up, your job prospects will atrophy, you will be dropped from
your membership in various clubs and other associations, your neighbors
will begin to avoid you - and all with little or no explanation. [This
is precisely the kind of "holiness" to which Oliver North and his CIA
cronies had to adjust their lives while working with evangelical Christians
in the Contra training camps in Honduras during the "Contra Wars" of
the 1980s (please see our articles, "The Death Squads: Bringing in the
Kingdom of God through Terror, Torture and Death," and "Evangelicals
and the Death Squads: Oh What a Tangled Web We Are Weaving for Ourselves").]
OPENING YOURSELF UP
TO A "NEW PARADIGM"
and sisters in Christ: I realize that what we are saying here is difficult
to accept - not so much from a factual or a Scriptural standpoint (after
all, the facts and the Scripture are there for anyone to see who really
wants to see), but because if we accept these things for real, it will
cause us to DRASTICALLY change our lives; it will force
us to enter a "NEW PARADIGM."
Now I realize that most Christians rebel at the use of this supposed
"New Age" term, but the term is appropriate here. The phrase, "new paradigm"
means a "new reality;" a "new pattern of thinking" - and it is relevant
here because most so-called Christians in the United States have been
living in a FALSE paradigm; one that is NOT
BIBLICAL and one that is NOT REAL
- and it is easy to see why. The truth is, for Christians to admit,
for example, that what's been going on in the black community is the
result of a WAR that has been purposefully launched against
them by the elites, one that has been willfully designed to SUPPRESS
blacks and prevent them from ever coalescing again as a REVOLUTIONARY
force for social and economic change in the country as they did during
the Civil Rights Movement, is tantamount to opening one's self up to
a NIGHTMARE; a PHANTASM that - if believed
- cannot help but sweep away the comfortable conceits around which most
white Christians have constructed their lives: Specifically, that the
world they live in is basically a "good" world; that the elites they
have allied themselves with are "good" people who have acquired their
wealth as the result of "hard work" and "good deeds;" people who want
nothing more than to help the Christian community "establish righteousness"
in the world and bring in the "Kingdom of God." But this is a LIE,
and an easily pierced lie at that.
THE WHOLE WORLD LIETH IN WICKEDNESS
The Bible says:
"... the whole world lieth in wickedness." (1 John 5:19)
Do you believe that? Do you really believe that? Totally? Completely?
Without reservation? - OR do you, perhaps, believe that's
something of an exaggeration; that the Bible is "overstating" to make
a point. If you believe that - i.e., that the Bible is "expanding" the
truth a little here - then you are living in a FALSE paradigm,
one that utterly prevents you from seeing the truth.
The Bible says that "... the whole world lieth in wickedness."
That's the WHOLE world! To believe anything less than
that is to construct your "reality" - your "paradigm" - on a foundation
of LIES, which is EXACTLY what Christians
in the United States have done, a FALSE "paradigm" that
prevents you from seeing the world (and - ipso facto - the United
States) for the NIGHTMARE it really is, NO MATTER WHAT
FACTS ARE PRESENTED TO YOU, AND NO MATTER WHAT THE SCRIPTURES SAY.
And more than that, it is a paradigm that prevents Christians from
seeing the richy-riches with whom they have allied themselves for what
they really are: small-minded, greedy, avaricious, grasping, rapacious,
twisted little gnomes who are driven by only one thing: the LUST
for MONEY; people about whom the Bible says serve -
"... divers lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful,
and hating one another." (Titus 3:3)
These are people like those who gathered earlier this year for the
meeting of the Kappa Beta Phi (not Phi Beta Kappa) "fraternity" at the
St. Regis Hotel in New York City to flaunt their wealth and power, people
like Alan Greenberg, former chief executive of Bear Stearns; Richard
Grasso, former head of the New York Stock Exchange; Kenneth G. Langone,
chairman of the exchange's compensation committee; Martin Lipton, a
founding partner of Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz, the powerful Wall
Street law firm; David H. Komansky, the former chairman and chief executive
officer of Merrill Lynch; Sanford I. Weill, the chairman of Citigroup;
Laurence D. Fink, the chief executive of Black Rock, the investment
management company; Thomas G. Maheras, the head of the fixed income
group at Citigroup; Leslie Goldwasser, a top bonds executive at Bear
Stearns; J. Ira Harris, a former senior partner and mergers and acquisitions
banker at Lazard Freres; Lawrence Zicklin, the retired chief executive
of Neuberger Berman, the asset management company and so forth and so
These are PRECISELY the kind of people the Bible condemns
"as living in malice and envy, hateful, and hating one another."
It wasn't without reason that Balzac said of these people:
"Behind every great fortune, there is a great crime."
Indeed, the Bible says:
"... they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and
into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which DROWN men
in DESTRUCTION and PERDITION." (1 Tim.
And certainly that would include all of these people!
Pretty heavy - i.e., that the rich are "drowning in destruction
and perdition!" But, again, that's what the Bible says! That's the
"paradigm" in which the TRUTH of the Word of God exists.
And, naturally enough, it's a paradigm that - even if you have trouble
seeing - the poor of the earth don't have any trouble recognizing.
LIVING OUTSIDE OF CHRIST
To doubt this "paradigm" is tantamount to living outside of what the
Bible calls TRUTH, which is to say, OUTSIDE OF CHRIST;
after all, one cannot separate truth from Christ. Jesus said of Himself,
"... I am the way, the TRUTH, and the life: no man
cometh unto the Father, but by me." (John 14:6)
For a Christian to live outside of this "biblical Paradigm" (which
is to say, if he doesn't really believe that "the WHOLE world
lieth in wickedness") is tantamount to saying that such a Christian
is LIVING OUTSIDE OF CHRIST. Jesus said:
"... for this cause came I into the world, that I SHOULD BEAR
WITNESS TO THE TRUTH. Every one that is of the truth heareth
my voice [i.e., lives in the paradigm that Christ has established]."
If YOU are not bearing witness to the TRUTH
(i.e., if you are not living in the biblical paradigm), you are none
of Christ's, and the Christianity that you embrace is a FALSE
kind of Christianity, that bears witness to a FALSE Christ
and a FALSE Gospel (2 Cor. 11:4); a kind of Christianity
that attracts -
"... false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into
the apostles of Christ." (2 Cor. 11:13)
WHICH PARADIGM DO YOU LIVE IN?
paradigm do you live in? Sadly, I know of many so-called Christians
who are living outside of the biblical paradigm; for instance, one dear
brother in Christ recently wrote me and "righteously" berated me for
calling the United States "Babylon the Great." [I wonder what country
he would nominate? - Zambia? Mozambique? Costa Rica? Maybe the E.C.?
(Please see our article, "The Search for Babylon; What Do the Scriptures
Say?" Please also see our article, "Reducing Europe to the Status of
Greece in the Days of Rome."]
went on to scold me for saying that our rights as citizens have been
severely restricted; that our right to assemble and protest the policies
of the government is being hampered to the point where it no longer
has any practical meaning; that our right to travel when and where we
please is being abridged; that the draft is imminent; that the police
are being "militarized;" that the country is headed for a dictatorship;
and so on and so forth. He concluded, "Where is your proof? ...
Where do you find the evidence to support all of your facts?"
WHAT? - I suppose that he would call confining protesters
to "DEMONSTRATION PENS" as was done recently in Boston and New
York, and not allowing marchers to get anywhere close to where the "richy-riches"
are meeting is making provision for average people to "assemble and
protest" the actions of the government? I suppose that he thinks it's
okay when the police arrest thousands of demonstrators, most of whom
were NOT violent, despite what the mainline media says?
[Arrests on this scale NEVER occurred in the 1960s and
early '70s - and I know what I am talking about here; I was a member
of the 515th Counter-Intelligence Group at the time.]
Moreover, I suppose that's what the government is doing insofar as
airline travel is concerned (especially placing people without their
knowledge on "green," yellow," and "red" WATCH lists without
any recourse) is not having our right to travel hampered? Nor is what
the government planning to do in limiting our right to travel by train,
bus and car in its new CAPPS II program a restriction on our right to
travel and move about the country? Ad infinitum, ad nauseum.
It's as if he has never read ANYTHING on our website,
though he says that he has. He doesn't see any of these things, because
the paradigm in which he lives prevents him from seeing them. The facts
of the matter have nothing to do with his not seeing. The truth is,
he is simply not disposed to seeing what's happening.
MONEY AND SUCCESS CHANGES OUR PERSPECTIVE
I know this brother very well. He lived with me while I helped pastor
a "Jesus People"-kind of church in Washington D.C. in the early 1970s.
He was just a teenager then, and he lived in the same "commune" I lived
in, in Arlington, and later in Georgetown. He was a very humble and
loving brother at the time, and while most of what I have been given
by the Lord to preach today was then only embryonically formed in my
mind, he embraced it with all of his heart. He was poor; we all were
poor - and none of us had any trouble then seeing the world for what
it really was. [I URGE you, if you haven't already, to
read about those years and the Jesus Revolution that I was a part of
in my article, "The Jesus Revolution and the Search for Community and
the Church-Life." While most of those who participated in the "Jesus
Revolution" of those years consider them to have been "wasted years,"
I still hold them as being very, very precious - a lesson well-learned
Later the movement broke up, and most of us went our separate ways,
many off to the world and to what is termed "success" in this "present
evil world" (Gal. 1:4); this brother was no exception. Today he
lives in a beautiful home in Manassas (a suburb of Washington D.C.),
has a successful business, and a happy marriage. While there have been
"ups and downs" in his life, life is certainly good to him now. Sadly,
however, this so-called "success" has blinded him to the reality of
this "present evil world" (Gal. 1:4). The biblical paradigm he
once embraced concerning the world has been exchanged for a FALSE
paradigm that UTTERLY and COMPLETELY prevents
him from seeing what we are talking about on the pages of our website,
so that in him is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah which says by -
"... hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing
ye shall see, and shall not perceive ..." (Matt. 13:14)
WEALTH SHIPWRECKS OUR FAITH
Success in the world has "shipwrecked" his faith. He cannot see even
if he wanted to see now. He is as blind as the Christians in Laodicea
about whom the Lord said,
"And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These
things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning
of the creation of God;
"I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would
thou wert cold or hot.
"So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I
will spue (VOMIT) thee out of my mouth.
"Because thou sayest, I am (materially) rich, and increased with
(material) goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that
thou art (spiritually) wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind,
and naked ..." (Rev. 3:14-17)
The wealth that the Christians at Laodicea possessed had blinded them
to the reality in which they were living. They had embraced a "paradigm"
that UTTERLY prevented them from seeing their real condition,
and the real condition of the world that surrounded them. And so it
is with this particular brother. There is NOTHING that
can be done for him anymore! There is simply no way that the TRUTH
can break through and save him. He could not hear the truth about the
world today even if someone "rose from the dead" and went to see him.
THE RICH YOUNG RULER
He is possessed by the same FALSE paradigm that possessed
the "rich man" in Luke 16:19-31:
"There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and
fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day:
"And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at
his gate, full of sores,
"And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich
man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores.
"And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by
the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was
"And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth
Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.
"And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send
Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool
my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.
"But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst
thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is
comforted, and thou art tormented.
"And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf
fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither
can they pass to us, that would come from thence.
"Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest
send him to my father's house:
"For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest
they also come into this place of torment.
"Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let
them hear them.
"And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from
the dead, they will repent.
"And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets,
NEITHER WILL THEY BE PERSUADED, THOUGH ONE ROSE FROM THE DEAD."
DON'T THINK THAT THERE IS GOING TO BE A SECOND CHANCE
Sadly - very sadly - this brother is gone. He can no longer
be "persuaded" by the TRUTH. Only prayer can help him
now, and one should NOT think that our praying will accomplish
much for him. The fact is, the kind of mindset that now possesses this
brother and others like him causes Christ to WRETCH. That's
what the Bible says (Rev. 3:16).
And listen here, dear brothers and sisters in Christ, don't think that
the Lord will necessarily go back for those who have embraced this kind
of paradigm. He didn't do it with the "rich man" who said he wanted
to follow Jesus, but refused to give up his wealth to do so; Jesus just
let him go:
"And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good
thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?
"And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none
good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep
"He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder,
Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt
not bear false witness,
"Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour
"The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from
my youth up: what lack I yet?
"Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that
thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in
heaven: and come and follow me.
"But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful:
for he had great possessions.
"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That
a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven." (Matt.
Please don't make the error of thinking that the Lord will chase after
such people. I somberly warn you, you are making a big mistake in "testing"
the Lord in that way. The Bible says:
"... Today if ye will hear his (i.e., God's) voice,
"Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation, in the day of temptation
in the wilderness:
"When your fathers tempted (i.e., tested) me, proved me, and saw
my works forty years.
"Wherefore I was grieved with that generation, and said, They do
alway err in their heart; and they have not known my ways.
"So I sware in my wrath, THEY SHALL NOT ENTER INTO MY
"TAKE HEED, BRETHREN, LEST THERE BE IN ANY OF YOU AN EVIL HEART
OF UNBELIEF, IN DEPARTING FROM THE LIVING GOD." (Heb. 3:7-12)
So, again I warn you, Do not think that the Lord will come back for
you. He may not!
As for me, I refuse to squander my time with such people! - they've
already made up their mind. Why should I waste my time arguing with
them? Nor is there any purpose in trying to "find common ground" with
such people, which is - as far as I am concerned -tantamount to compromising
THE PERIL OF "SEEKING COMMON
GROUND" WITH YOUR ADVERSARIES
The fact is, those who "seek common ground" with their adversaries
are not people given very much to their beliefs. They don't have the
courage of their convictions, and - as a result - they are willing to
compromise their beliefs in order to maintain their friendships and
life-styles. These are the kind of people who would recoil at the words
of Christ when He said:
"He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not
with me scattereth abroad." (Matt. 12:30)
The truth is, there are too many people in this world who in fact are
open to the TRUTH to waste time on those who aren't.
I realize that that's precisely the kind of attitude that gets me labeled
a "Jim Jones," but any "teller of the truth" is going to be labeled
that these days. So what? The truth about the U.S. is there for anyone
who wants to see it, and the truth about what's going to happen to those
who stay in the U.S. is also there for anyone who wants to see it. People
act as if - somehow or other - they have hurt me by not agreeing with
me. They've not hurt me; they are the ones who someday will be hurt,
Brothers and sisters, these are very DANGEROUS times
in which we are living, and the Bible warns you that you should -
"... take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged
with [the] ... CARES OF THIS LIFE (as this brother very plainly
is), and so that day come upon you unawares." (Luke 21:34)
faith is on the line, and we shall see whether it is for real or not.
We are going to be tested, and the test is not going to be a hypothetical
one; it is going to be for REAL. [We urge you to read
Chapter 11 of the Antipas Papers, "Tribulation and Judgment,"
for a scriptural explanation of the coming "test."]
The question to be answered is this: Are you the kind of person who
has the courage of your convictions? Or are you the kind of person who
- like Nicodemus who came to Jesus BY NIGHT because he
was afraid of the "authorities" - are willing to associate with us only
from afar (John 3:2)? And why would that be? Well, obviously, the government
can't approve too much of your association with Antipas; after all,
the material on our website can't be scoring too many points with Bush
and his Religious Right cronies? - and don't think for a moment that
the government isn't WATCHING those of you who associate
with us; that it isn't able to trace the support checks you mail us,
the emails you send us, and so forth. If you think that the government
can't do all these things, and that they aren't doing it right now,
then I have some swampland in Florida I would like to sell you. As a
result, there are a lot of people who - while they avidly read the material
on our websites - are, nonetheless, too afraid to contact us or do anything
about what they have read, financially or otherwise. They are cowards,
plain and simple. They simply do not have the courage of their convictions.
There will, however, be a reckoning someday. This life doesn't go on
forever - and after that, the Judgment (Heb. 9:27). In the light of
that, we would do well to remember the words of Christ when He said,
"... whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before
my Father which is in heaven." (Matt. 10:33). [And do not think that
your supposed "Christianity" will spare you here; that God will overlook
your cowardice. He won't!]
More next time!
Until then, God bless you,
We need your help to spread the word concerning Antipas Ministries and the
eschatological viewpoint it represents; WE NEED YOUR
HELP BECAUSE WE DO NOT "LINK" WITH OTHER SO-CALLED "CHRISTIAN"
WEBSITES which are, for the most part, "in the tank"
insofar as their loyalty to the United States is concerned
- a loyalty that has made them partners in the BLOODY
trail the American military has left in its TERROR-RIDDEN
rampage throughout the world, as well as making them partners
in the abject poverty that American corporations have
imposed on the peoples and nations the American military
machine has ravaged - A BLOODY, TERROR-RIDDEN RAMPAGE
THAT HAS TO A LARGE DEGREE BEEN CARRIED OUT IN THE NAME
OF THE "PRINCE OF PEACE." [Please see our articles,
"The Third World
as a Model for the New World Order," Inside
the American New World Order System" and "The
American Empire: The Corporate / Pentagon / CIA / Missionary
YOU CAN HELP BY EMAILING
THIS ARTICLE TO
YOUR FRIENDS AND