![]() |
|||||||||||
INTRODUCTION: THEOLOGY
|
| Alternative Schools Work with Youth Gangs Food Pantries Housing Assistance Pregnancy Assistance On-Site Social Services Literacy Programs Financial Assistance Transportation Clothes Closets |
Battered Women Assistance Senior Citizens Programs Employment for Homeless English as a Second Language Counseling/Educational Support Personal Services for Homeless Nursing Home Ministries Work with At-Risk Youth Soup Kitchen/Street Feeds Humanitarian Aid - Orphanages |
Counseling Drug Assistance Job Training Eye Care Referrals Adoption Services Shelters Tutoring Childcare GED Tutoring |
[And it should be noted in this connection that Governor Bush has made channeling government funds through private agencies like Somebody Cares (which, as Governor of Texas, he is familiar with) one of the most important programs he plans to initiate as President; he considers the shift of public welfare money away from public agencies to private agencies one of the most important domestic programs of his planned presidency.]
This is a staggering number of programs which could involve potentially enormous amounts of money for church and para-church organizations! - and, if Bush and his allies have their way, there exists the very real possibility that in the near future a good deal of this money will be flowing through private (read church and para-church) welfare agencies like Somebody Cares, and as it passes through these agencies, it will both empower and enrich them beyond measure.
The potential shift of these funds from public agencies to private agencies (mostly churches and para-church organizations like Somebody Cares) will accomplish three things:
Naturally, the churches which are in the best position to take advantage of these funds are those churches and para-church organizations that are already involved in ecumenicism - and the longer they have been involved, the better. And what churches are those? - those churches involved in the so-called "Restoration Movement." They champion an eschatology (i.e., "Dominionism") that possesses an internal dynamic which embraces the kind of "inter-denominational bonding" that the feds (and state and local authorities) are looking for insofar as the distribution of their (i.e., the governments') funds are concerned.
Perhaps, if government officials really knew what Restoration and Dominionism were really all about - and fully understood the extreme militancy of those who are involved in these movements - they might think twice about entrusting public funds into their hands. It's akin to handing a gun to someone who has sworn to kill you.
Oh, you think that we are being too much here? - too excessive or intemperate? Well, consider: these people possess a belief system that leads them to think that God has ordained them to rid the earth of all His enemies in a "cleansing action," helped along by the angels of heaven. In carrying out this "cleansing action," they believe that they will be purifying the earth for Christ's return. Bob Jones, a leader in this movement has said:
"As we see the day approaching there's going to be a cleansing ... there's going to be a purging ... coming forth ... and everyone that's living under the immorality cover ... will be brought down. And God's new breed will come forth ..."[5]
Another writer, Jack Deere, has written:
"Jesus is coming in power and he's going to have an army that is powerful, and this is the army that he speaks of in Joel. No one can stop it, and it will strike TERROR into the hearts of everyone ... This army is invincible ..." [6]
And R.J. Rushdoony writes:
"In winning a nation to the gospel, the sword (i.e., gun) as well as the pen must be used." [Please see our material on Rushdoony in our article entitled, "The Rutherford Institute."].
Pretty scary stuff - but such is the government's ignorance of these matters, that most of these officials have no idea what many of these churches and para-church organizations are really all about. All they know is that these organizations are doing a pretty good job insofar as many of the social welfare programs they are administering are concerned. That's all that they care about! - it's akin to a phenomenon already "afoot" in the Middle East wherein one finds that those groups that are most deeply engaged in charity work in poor communities are the radical Islamic groups such as Hamas in the West Bank and Gaza and the Gamas Islamiya and the Ikhwan el Muslemin (Muslim Brotherhood) in Egypt - all of which function as benevolent neighborhood groups operating clinics, welfare organizations, centers for food distribution, etc.
But there is more to these groups than their surface benevolence reveals. Operating just below the surface is a radical religious mindset that aims at radicalizing the entire Middle East and beyond - and such is precisely the case with these Christian groups in the West, especially those in the United States - groups like Somebody Cares in Houston, Texas. Dominionism or Restoration is the mindset driving these groups. In throwing money at groups like these, all the government is doing is empowering them that much the more.
Yes! - there is another agenda beyond simple benevolence that's driving groups like Somebody Cares, and that's where Dominionism and Restoration come into the picture. We need to understand what these concepts are all about - because in funding these groups, the government is empowering and legitimizing them at the same time.
"Dominionism"
is a militant post-millennial eschatology (please see
our material on post-millennialism in our last article, "Striking a
Blow at Today's Pastoral System") which pictures the seizure of earthly
(temporal) power by the church as the only means through which the world
can be rescued; only after the world has been thus "rescued" can Christ
return to "rule and reign." (Some dominionists see the seizure of the
earth as the result of "signs, wonders, and miracles;" others picture
it as the result of military and political conquest; most see it as
a combination of both.) Al Dager writes,
"Some two decades before Pentecostalism found its way into the (mainstream) denominations (i.e., the Episcopalians, the Catholic Church, etc.) as the 'Charismatic Renewal', it experienced a new surge of experience-oriented theology within its own ranks. It was from this neo-Pentecostal experience - what came to be called the 'Latter Rain Movement' - that Charismatic Dominionism sprang. The more prominent leaders of that movement blended Pentecostal fervor with teachings that the Church was on the brink of a worldwide revival. That revival would result in a victorious Church without spot or wrinkle ... (which) would inherit the earth and rule over the nations with a rod of iron." Dager explains that at the core of the dominionist mindset is "a ... premise ... that when Adam sinned, not only did man lose dominion over the earth, but God also lost control of the earth to Satan. Since that time ... God has been on the outside looking in, searching for a 'covenant people' who will be His 'extension' or 'expression' in the earth to take dominion back from Satan ..."[7]
The basic dominionist model is as follows:
Jewel van der Merwe of Discernment Magazine, elaborates; she writes that the "New Charismatics" are actively pushing a belief system which prophesies that
" ... (1) the greatest revival the church has ever known (is about to occur); (2) the greatest baptism of the Spirit the Church has ever experienced (will shortly happen); (3) the greatest army (Joel's Army) distinguished by invincibility, immortality and divinity (will be raised up); (4) the greatest purging ... in the history of the church (will shortly begin);1 (5) the greatest ministry - the Prize of all Ages (is about to break forth); and (6) the greatest miracles, supernatural signs and wonders far exceeding that of the Apostles and Prophets of old (will shortly take place)."[ 8]
The dominionist model[9], however, is at total variance with the older premillennial model. The premillennial model pictures:
This model is essentially the model of Hal Lindsey's Late Great Planet Earth, with the exception that Lindsey postulates that Christians will be raptured out of the world prior to the beginning of the persecution of the anti-Christ. Premillennialists are divided on the point of the rapture; some argue that the rapture will occur before the tribulation, some say during, and some say afterwards - but the essential elements of the rest of the model remain.]
It should also be noted in this connection that in the dominionist model, the church is the "main player," while in the premillennialist model, Christ is the "main player."
In one way or another, all those listed on page one of this article - including Franklin Hall, William Branham, George Hawtin, Percy G. Hunt, Herrick Holt, George Warnock, Bill Britton, Kathryn Kuhlman, Oral Roberts, Ern Baxter, Don Basham, Bob Mumford, Charles Simpson, Derek Prince, D. James Kennedy, William Banks, Marilyn Hickey, Demos Shakarian, Ralph Martin, Steve Clark, Kevin Ranaghan, etc. - have all been involved in "Dominionism" and "Latter Rain."[10]
Tricia Tillin of Banner Ministries[ 11] [Banner Ministries: webmaster@banner.org.uk] writes that Restorationists believe that not long after the birth of the Church, it became stifled by tradition and laws, and the vibrancy and spiritual power of the Early Church was lost. This needed to be RESTORED, and the process took centuries. From time to time, certain individuals or groups would gain access to the secrets of power and authority, and they would begin preaching the "kingdom message" but up until this century they were seen as heretics and rejected by the established churches.[12]
Tillin says that the turning point came in the 1960's with a worldwide renewal accompanied by spiritual gifts. The conversion experience was seen as the Outer Court of the Tabernacle, Baptism in the Spirit moved the believer into the Holy Place of Ministry. However, the Holy of Holies containing the Presence of God had yet to be entered! One important feature to be restored in this latter-day church was to be the ministry of apostle, prophet, teacher, pastor and evangelist "For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ" (Eph 4:11-13).
Once the new structures had been set in place, and the people were willing to submit to them (shepherding and covering schemes all helped this process along), the PROPHETS would introduce NEW DOCTRINES by direct inspiration of the Spirit. This would begin the next phase of development, from the old structures to the new paradigm. Now not only the structure and form of the churches were changing, but the core beliefs - and the traditional pre-millennial mindset of evangelicalism was swept aside in favor of a post-millennial mindset (please see our recent article that touches on this matter: "Striking a Blow at Today's Pastoral System").
Tillin writes that it would be the duty of the new "anointed" apostles of the movement to uphold and enforce these new doctrines on the churches. These (i.e., the new apostles) were not to be mere servants of the people, but kings and rulers, beyond contradiction. To question them was tantamount to rebelling against God, since the Apostles were representatives of Christ on earth. Being "saved" was not now enough. Believers had to passive and obedient to qualify for membership in the New Church. A network of interconnected and related apostles was to be set up in every city, having headship of all the new churches.
Tillin continues:
"A most important factor in the restoration of the worldwide Church was to be the unity of all believers, for without this the glory could not return to the spiritual Temple. Remember, that Ephesians verse promising fullness, perfection and Christ-likeness had said "Till we all come in the unity of the faith...," Accordingly, all dissent and inter-denominational strife had to be silenced (or, swept under the carpet). Treaties and covenants were drawn up for ministers to sign, wherein they vowed not to"criticise each other." The Roman Catholic Church (especially and mostly its charismatic wing) was also incorporated as part of the Restored Church."[13]
What Restorationists and Dominionists are ultimately pushing for is the establishment of a worldwide network of apostles governing whole nations and regions within those nations, and under them a whole edifice composed of submitted pastors, prophets and other elders all of whom give allegiance to those above them: a giant pyramid-like structure to which all the churches of the world are submitted.
Naturally, in such a system - one that aims at taking over the world in the "here and now," - it would be fair to say that money - lots and lots of money - would come in very handy. After all, that's what the "here and now" is all about - MONEY. And the way the system is set up, the more unity that can be forged, the more money will be forthcoming - again, the United Way phenomenon!
In this way, an upwardly spiraling vortex is set in motion wherein unity begets more money, which draws in more churches, which in turn begets more money still, which in turn draws more churches in - ad infinitum. Greed is the driving force here - the lust to get in on the action! It's pretty hard for a church to stay on the sideline in this kind of a dynamic; to stand silently by and watch all your sister churches expanding their school programs, their ministerial programs, building bigger sanctuaries, etc., etc. Look at all the good that can be done with all that money. Pretty hard to resist that kind of a dynamic. But there is a pretty hefty price to pay to get in on the action - your indpendence; doctrinal purity; etc.!! Yes!! - there is a price to be paid!!
Tillin says that no longer will churches be independent, self-governing, and autonomous. All that will end under this new scheme. Pastors are called to submit to their local Apostle, and each city or area will be required to come into unity with all other city churches and to sign covenants pledging not to discriminate, nor to poach each other's members, nor to criticize one another's doctrine - and as bizarre and Orwellian as all this sounds, the whole thing is well under way in some quarters. Tillin quotes from a pastor in Baltimore who has enthusiastically involved himself (and his church) in the process:
"... We have just closed one of the most powerful months in God that I believe I have experienced! First, we gathered over 80 pastors from Baltimore city and county for a retreat called Peace For The City. This was the largest INTER-DENOMINATIONAL gathering of pastors that this area has seen. Our guest speaker was Dr. David Schoch, a true father in the faith. He provided the insight, impartation and guidance of a patriarch. The Peace gathering was marked with reconciliation; both denominational and racial. Then, in a sovereign move of the spirit, a covenant was written and signed by the pastors. This covenant (which, like most covenants of this kind, limits people from speaking out against the dogmas and teachings of those other churches which are signatores of the covenant - editor) knitted the congregations, ministries and PULPITS of their churches together into ONE CHURCH in Baltimore. On May 2, 1999, these pastors will trade pulpits and preach in each other's churches! Already, this covenant has been adopted by churches in other cities and has even been taken to Argentina!"[14 ]
Phil Townend, a Restorationist in England, elaborates on what's going on here:
"At this very moment in history God is beginning to cover the world with a network of interlocking relationships between groups of believers in every place. ...In the process, God is releasing the Body of Christ world-wide from many of its traditional and 'neo-traditional' constraints in order to make room for new developments and allow for the level of joining that is required ...
"Nowhere is the change that is taking place more evident or needed than at a local level. The biblical concept of a 'city' is helpful, if understood to include a town, borough or other administrative area... The principle to bear in mind is to pursue as far as we can unity at EVERY level... Bearing this in mind, we can define local church, in its simplest, biblical terms, as the sum of believers in a given area ...
"What will emerge is one interlinked network of believers in a given area... Relational unity among recognized leaders is a clear prerequisite for what is coming... United leadership is needed to bring cohesion within the wider local Body ...
"It is important that each local congregation ask itself a fundamental question about how it views its life and ministry. Does it operate out of an independent mindset, expressing a unilateral vision, with only a secondary or optional regard to what else is going on locally? Or does it seek out fellow local believers, desiring a corporate vision for an area together, looking to find its place in the wider context? The latter situation must become normative for everyone to prosper ...
"Rebellious, divisive and critical attitudes and behavior on our part with regard to God's people and any existing church structures are never justified, and will seriously hamper, if not severely undermine, what God is doing at the present time."[15]
Now, this is precisely what is needed by the government if the Religious Right is to be properly positioned to act as a conduit for government money - the creation, as it were, of a kind of religiously-oriented United Way through which government funds could be channeled in an efficient and expeditious fashion.. The two (i.e., the Republican elites and the Religious Right) are playing a game that feeds into each other.
From all this we can easily see that what's going on with "Somebody Cares" in Houston - and a myriad of other similar groups throughout the country - is not occurring happen-chance, but is part of a larger process with vast implications for all of us. Moreover, there is a pattern to what is happenin. These groups are not just coming together willy-nilly.
There is a very discernable pathology here - a pathology which is - almost without exception - initiated by churches and para-church organizations with ties to the Restoration Movement: the process is launched around an altruistic goal - such as preaching the Gospel, prayer, reaching out to the poor, etc. - all of which, NO DOUBT, are worthwhile endeavors!! Moreover, it is based around - as Restorationist Phil Townend describes above - a "relational dynamic" - a dynamic that is predicated on the hypothesis that, all things being equal, relationships trump ideas in the affairs of man; that communities, once they are established, will fight to preserve their integrity even if it means that members must ultimately jettison their own individual beliefs in order to preserve harmony within the larger group.
The power of the dynamic rests on the very human impulse to preserve friendships and relationships at almost any cost, and that - therefore - people will hesitate to attack one another on an ideological or theological basis once relationships have been formed or established. And this is true!! - hence, our assertion that, under normal circumstances, relationships almost always trump ideas (i.e., theologies or beliefs). This, of course, is what Restorationists like Rick Joyner, Paul Cain, Emanuele and David Cannistraci, Dick Iverson, Bill Hamon, C. Peter Wagner, etc., and groups like "Somebody Cares" are counting on. When this human impulse is then greased with money - AND LOTS OF IT - it takes on an almost irresistible impetus.
Many people, of course, will say, Well, what's wrong with that? And the answer to that is, "Biblically, much in every way," and so much so that Jesus somberly warns us about it - which is exactly what He was doing when He said,
"He that loveth father or mother more than me is NOT worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is NOT worthy of me. (Matt. 10:37)
Pretty harsh! - especially when one considers that there are no relationships closer than these relationships. And remember here, Jesus was not talking to people who were at that time considered to be outside the "Community of God," but to people who very much thought of themselves - and rightfully so - to be members of the same common, God-ordained community: Israel.
What?
Does this mean that following Jesus may sometimes cost us our relationship
with other believers? Yes! - indeed, it does!! This probably is not
what most well-meaning Christians have been told - but, in the church
(if not within human communities), theology trumps relationships!
- fidelity (i.e., loyalty) to the Word of God ALWAYS takes
precedence over relationships. (Please see our article, "Working Within
The Establishment Church or Outside of It: What Should We Do?")
The Bible says that the church is -
"... the PILLAR and GROUND of the TRUTH" (1 Tim. 3:15)
But if the church doesn't "abide in that truth" (I John 2:27) can it really be called the church any longer? The answer is obviously, No! Just because people who call themselves Christians meet together and profess love one for another does not in itself mean that they meet as the church. The Mormons, the Moonies, the Jehovah Witnesses and countless other similar sects call themselves Christian and claim to love one another - but does that mean that when they meet together, they meet as (or constitute) the church? No, of course not! Why? - because they do not meet on the "ground of truth" (1 Tim. 3:15), despite the fact that they call themselves Christians. Take away the truth, and you destroy the church! You can't have one without the other! Jesus said,
"Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men." (Matt. 5:13)
- that is to say, if the church loses its savour, [i.e., its standing insofar as the truth ("sound doctrine) is concerned], it no longer can be considered the church. It loses its standing as the church. Evangelicals like Paul and Jan Crouch, the late John Wimber, Chuck Colson, etc., therefore, make (made) a big mistake in thinking that church unity can be achieved by compromising doctrine. We repeat, doctrine cannot be compromised without at the same time compromising the church's standing before God. The harsh fact of the matter is, the Bible says that those who abide not in "sound doctrine" are of the devil:
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44)
And remember here, if one thinks these sayings (i.e., verses) are too harsh, his or her controversy is not with us, it's with God. The truth is, on the basis of John 8:44, one should seriously ask himself - What's this say about Paul Crouch, Bennie Hinn and Charles Colson? We repeat, Christianity and "sound doctrine" can't be separated! On the contrary, the Bible plainly teaches that "... the true worshippers MUST worship God in spirit and truth" -
"... the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.(John 4:23-24)
The very real fact is, God and "Truth" are synonymous - they are intrinsically one; they cannot be separated - and it is for this reason that the Bible calls the "Comforter" (i.e., the Holy Spirit) the "Spirit of Truth:"
"... when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me ..." (John 15:26)
But it is exactly Truth (doctrinal purity) that groups like Somebody Cares seek to jettison (or compromise) in their efforts to achieve unity. And make no mistake about it, doctrinal purity does not rate very highly in any of their thinking. Indeed, it's no accident or the result of a "moment of indescretion" that Paul Crouch, president of the Trinity Broadcasting Network, one of this country's premier Christian broadcasting networks, said of those who oppose the "unity movement" for doctrinal reasons:
"... that old rotten Sanhedrin crowd ... they're damned and on their way to hell and I don't think there's any redemption for them ... the hypocrites, the heresy hunters that want to find a little mote of illegal doctrine in some Christian's eyes ... when they've got a whole forest in their own lives ... I say, to hell with you! Get out of my life! Get out of the way! Quit blockin' God's bridges (of ecumenicism)! I'm tired of this! ... This is in my spirit. Oh Hallelujah ... Pharisees, heresy-hunters, all of you that are going around pickin' little bits of doctrinal error out of everybody's eyes and dividin' the Body of Christ ... get out of God's way, stop blockin' God's bridges (of unity) ... let Him sort out all this doctrinal doodoo (i.e., sh-t)! ... I refuse to argue any longer with any of you out there! Don't even call me if you want to argue ... Get out of my life! I don't want to talk to you ... I don't want to see your ugly face."[16]
Crouch calls doctrine "sh-t"!!! Clearly, then, one can't say that doctrine plays much of a role in Crouch's scheme of things - and Crouch can't be written off as an aberration; after all, he is an extremely important person in evangelicalism today. No! - he's not an anomaly! (though some would probably refrain from Crouch's graphic terminology). He pretty much reflects the thinking of most in the evangelical community today - so wide has the influence of Restoration concepts spread in the larger Christian community!
And be clear here, this is exactly the animus that is behind groups like Somebody Cares insofar as doctrine is concerned - despite the sweet smiles, limp wrists, soft voices, and "other worldly" demeanor of many of the leaders involved in Restoration - indeed, by such a standard, Ghandi - clearly no Christian - would have been adjudged a "Man of God." Is this where we are headed? Obviously so if people like Paul Cain, Rick Joyner, etc. have their way.
What follows is the "Covenant of Unity" to which all those who wish to be a part of Somebody Cares must adhere. Note carefully points #3 and #8 - provisions which - if strictly enforced - would limit, if not completely eliminate, all honest criticism and open dissent. Churches which "sign on to" such covenants have, whether they realize it or not, "signed on to" a one-way trip into APOSTASY and from there to oblivion. This covenant is similar to hundreds of others being promoted throughout the country by organizations like CitiReach International in which countless churches are signing their independence away. The covenant reads as follows:
Covenant of UnityWe believe Jesus Christ has one church, His beloved bride, for whom he gave Himself. The church of Jesus Christ in Houston is comprised of many believers and congregations throughout the city. Jesus has sanctified and cleansed her with the washing of the Word of God so that she might be presented to Him, a glorious church without spot or wrinkle. Christ has committed the care, cleansing and preparation of the bride to us as shepherds. Endeavoring to keep unity of the spirit in the bond of peace, we solemnly and joyfully enter into this covenant, pledging that by God's grace we shall:
|
The Covenant of Unity calls for those who sign it to -
"... speak well of one another at ALL times, especially in our preaching and teaching."
At ALL times? Where is there any room for correction here? - there is none! People who seek to suppress honest criticism within the larger Christian community by recourse to covenants like these often point to Matthew 18:15-17 as justification for what they are doing. But this is bogus and nothing more than a limpid sham. These verses deal with carnal sin, not public pronouncements on questions of doctrine and politics. Statements made openly and in public should be answered openly and in public, not behind closed doors, unless, of course, suppression is what these covenants are really all about - which, naturally, is exactly what they're about!
It's obvious! What else is one to think when these covenants call on all those who have signed them to -
"... put to silence those who spread evil reports ..."
- by which they mean, make no mistake about it, criticism of any kind vis a vis the teachings of the leadership.
And what exactly do they mean, "Put to silence?" That's an intriguing question - and a very disquieting one!! - especially when uttered by people who say,
"As we see the day approaching there's going to be a cleansing ... there's going to be a purging ... coming forth ..."[17]
CityReach International is headed up by Jack Dennison, formerly of Multnomah School of the Bible. It is one of a myriad of other conservative Christian organizations headquartered out of Colorado Springs, Colorado. Colorado Springs has become a bee hive of activity in recent years insofar as Restoration is concerned.
The people involved in CityReach and the other myriad of church and para-church organizations headquartered in Colorado Springs, believe that they are living on the cutting edge of history. For example, the website of CityReach reads:
"Many people are convinced we are living in a day that is unparalleled in human history and unprecedented in Church history. Our day is surpassed in significance perhaps only by the First Century itself. There is a current and widespread agreement that God has breathed into the hearts of believers everywhere an expectation that He intends a move in our nation, and around the world, of unmatched magnitude.
"We are convinced this visitation is intended to transform the religious, social, economic and political structures of our culture and spark an awakening and response among the unsaved of unprecedented proportions. The uncertainty regarding this grand expectation is neither in God's willingness nor in His ability to do it, but in the Church's readiness to receive it.
"At CitiReach International we love the city. Any city. Every city! Our agency and this site are designed to serve the Church's efforts to fulfill the Great Commission in every city and community around the world. Like a great spiritual tsunami the expectation for divine visitation is cresting and will soon envelop the Church and the world in the greatest spiritual and social movement in history. The time to get ready is now!" [18]
The group responsible for bringing many of these ministries to Colorado is El Pomar. The purpose of El Pomar, as written in its "Statement of Purpose" on file at the Secretary of State's office in Denver, is to -
".. maintain funds and apply (these funds) to such charitable uses and purposes (as it deems fit)." The distribution of these funds is to be left to the "... absolute and uncontrolled discretion of the trustees."
In other words, El Pomar is a financial conduit for people who wish to hide their identities. While there is certainly nothing wrong with such giving - indeed, there is much to commend about it - this kind of giving is relatively unique to, and has all the hallmarks of, "Old Money."
And this indeed appears to be the case. El Pomar is headed up by William Thayer Tutt, President; Adrian J. French, Vice President; and Frank T. Rea, Secretary / Treasurer.[19] These same men are also associated as directors and "movers and shakers" with the Broadmoor Country Club and the World Senior Golf Federation, two EXTREMELY powerful social organizations associated with "Old Money" families.
What all this is suggestive of - especially to anyone familiar with how socially interlocked the nation's country clubs are - is that these ministries are "tapped into" - and are receiving substantial financial backing from - some of the nation's most powerful, traditionally oriented, "Old Money" families. The people associated with the Broadmoor Country Club and the World Senior Golf Association are not "rednecks" and "bozos" - something the liberal elites would be well advised to take note of (on the contrary, they are the kind of people associated with the CFR, the Heritage Institute, the WTO, etc.). In addition, our source[ 20] for this information (a source which has proven to be extremely reliable in the past) has indicated that the Catholic Arch Diocese of Denver is one of the many contributors to El Pomar - and hence is a conduit for Catholic money into the ministries El Pomar supports.
If this is true - and it very much appears to be so - it attests to how closely conservative social elites (of the CFR, Heritage Foundation variety), the Catholic Church, and evangelicals have been working - all under the table, of course. There's been more afoot over the past several years than most people realize; it is, as Constance Cumbey has suggested, more of a "Planned Deception" than one which is merely coincidental. In these kinds of affairs, money speaks volumes - and money is not something which is particularly coincidental. Add to all this the flow of government funds, in addition to the already substantial flow of private money, and one is well on the way towards creating the monster of Revelation 17 and 18 - and we are closer to that eventuality, if Bush and his allies have their way, than most people might realize.
The
fact is, a real convergence of interests has developed between the agendas
of elite Republicans, on the one hand, and the Religious Right, on the
other with regard to the use of public funds. Elite Republicans are
seeking to render impotent the liberal-left by destroying the bastions
of their power: (1) the government bureaucracy, and (2) the nation's
public school system. It is seeking to do so by PRIVATIZING
both the bureaucracy and the school system. The Religious Right is playing
into this dynamic by setting in motion a process (Restoration) aimed
at unifying its disparate elements so that it will be in a position
to act as an efficient conduit for the funds elite Republicans are hoping
to divert from the public agencies of government.
If
all this proves successful, it could very well set up a dynamic in this
country that will enable the Religious Right to FUNDAMENTALLY
alter the character of the nation - and God help the rest of the world
when that happens, because we are not talking about just any country,
but by far the most powerful nation on earth! The mischief that it is
capable of far surpasses the potential for mischief of any other nation
that has ever gone before it, and any nation that presently exists (or
any possible combination of nations). [Please see "The Revolution in
Military Affairs and American World-Hegemony," and "The American
Empire and the U.S. System of Client States."]
Take, for example, what the privatization of the nation's school system would mean from a cultural and a sociological standpoint. While, no doubt, vouchers would be available for use in secular as well as religious environments, religious institutions are far better positioned to take advantage of these funds than are secular institutions. For the most part, churches already possess the classrooms necessary to set up these schools; they possess already existing staffs and they possess devoted followers willing to take far less pay than would be the case in secular schools. As a result, churches and para-church organizations would be way out in front of their secular counterparts insofar as privatization is concerned.
Most studies indicate that if vouchers became a matter of widespread public policy, as many as one-quarter of the nation's student population would immediately seek to leave the nation's public schools system for private schools (and, ipso facto religious schools), so terrible are conditions in many of the nation's public schools today. Studies further indicate that those students who will probably leave are most likely to be the "best and the brightest;" in addition, these are precisely those students who are the ones most likely to have intact families with caring parents. The impact of such an exodus would be devastating to the public system; it would immediately deprive public schools of exactly the kind of students and parents it most needs to succeed.
As these students flow into religious schools, both they and their parents are very likely to find it convenient to become regular attendees of the churches to which the schools are attached. As a result, as attendance at religious schools increases, attendance at churches will probably likewise increase, creating an environment in which conservative Christian values could spread almost exponentially in the wider population.
Meanwhile, liberals will be stuck with failing schools and a failing cultural ethos, which will only serve to increase the exodus of still more students, whose parents - for whatever reasons - might not have been initially disposed to pull their children out of the public system, but who now begin to do so if only to save their children.
As these children enter the religious school system, they too will begin to imbibe heavily in conservative Christian values (and along with these values, they will also, no doubt, begin to absorb the Crusader mindset of people like Jack Dennison, Rick Joyner, Bob Jones, etc.) more deeply than would have ever been previously possible, and their parents - like the parents who preceded them - will also likewise begin to find it convenient to attend the churches to which their children's schools are attached, thereby becoming prisoners of the same pathology that their children have become prisoners of.
As this dynamic continues, it will begin to work itself out into the general population in a kind of cascading, wave like action, and with each succeeding wave, a little more of the ability of people to think for themselves will be eroded. And what will be driving this process? - the desire of ordinary people to provide an escape for their children from the chaos of the public school system. And make no mistake about it, this kind of pathology is quick-acting. When Hitler took power in Germany in 1933, he took power with only thirty-seven percent of the population behind him; nevertheless, at the end of three short years, over 90 percent of the population enthusiastically supported him!! - such is the power to persuade people that is given to those who control a nation's school system and social welfare bureaucracies.
Think about it! - the high point of Nazi success when they stood outside the institutions of government was thirty-seven percent of the vote (about the same percentage of voters in the general population that the Religious Right presently commands) - and that after years and years of strenuous activity. But three short years after taking over the institutions of government, ninety percent of the population had become ardent followers of Adolph Hitler. Ninety Percent!!
Could the same thing happen in the United States? - you bet it could!! And the reality is closer at hand than most people realize!! And how will all this be accomplished? By "signs and wonders? By prayer? By words of knowledge? By writhing on the floor, barking like dogs, and crowing like roosters? Well, what's all that accomplished in the last one or two decades? - not much! The fact is, there are very little results to show for all this. As Gary Clem points out, Dr. Cho has the largest church in the world in South Korea. He has more people praying in tongues all day every day than anywhere else on earth. Yet - the government of South Korea remains one of the most corrupt governments in the world, the sex trade in Soul is shameful beyond imagining, and student unrest continues to be a serious problem.
Then there's Tulsa, Oklahoma, the home of Rhema Bible Training Center and Oral Robert's City of Faith - yet gang violence, substance abuse, abortion, pornography, etc., remain major problems there. And the same is true of Brownsville and Toronto. There is no major city on earth that has been "taken for Christ and the church," (at least in the way that these so-called "Apostles and Prophets" are talking about) even though this teaching has been around for a number of years now. No! - none of these things will bring in what Rick Joyner, Paul Cain, Dick Iverson, etc. are aiming at. IT'S MONEY - lots and lots of money; that's what will do it. But wherever money is, Satan is not far behind!!
Now
it's not without reason that in our last article, "Striking a Blow at
Today's Pastoral System," we spent a lot of time on the importance
of our individual walk with Christ, and our trichotomous nature which
makes that walk possible. And why is that? - because the Bible clearly
indicates that in such a system as we have been describing here, there
will be no place for real Christians. Indeed, the Bible says that we
are to,
"COME OUT OF HER" (Rev. 18:4).
Moreover, the very real fact of the matter is, it may not be so much a question that we will have to decide to leave, as it is that if we try to remain faithful to our persuasions and refuse to be silent about them, we will be "invited" to leave - and, as time goes on, maybe much worse. Indeed, the Bible warns that there will come a time when -
"They shall put you out of the ... (churches): yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service." (John 16:2)
Obviously
then, for us to be able to stand against the pressure to conform - to
resist the temptation to give in and surrender to the current of the
day - our individual walk with Christ will have to be very solid indeed!
[And for this reason, we urge you to re-read our last article, plus
our article of November 21, 1998 "Individual Responsibility Before God."]
In addition, we must also bear in mind, as we described in our previous article, that just because we have been asked to leave the "Organized Church," we are not thereby released as Christians from our obligation to "produce" the church - and if that means retreating to our homes and establishing "house-churches" in order to carry on, so be it!!
Remember, no matter how disappointed we are in the concept of the church, no matter how much we have been hurt by our brothers and sisters in the Lord, we can never give up on the church. The church is God's testimony, and if we give up on the church, we give up on that testimony! The reality is, the Bible specifically warns against giving up on the church; it says -
"... hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful; and let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds, not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging {one another}; and all the more, as you see the day drawing near." (Heb. 10:23-25)
But, we repeat! - in all of this, we must continually bear in mind that the church begins not with the "collectivity," it starts, rather, with us as individuals. Our individual walk with Christ makes the church-life possible, not the other way around. Contrary to what so many teach today, the church is not something that must be organized; it's not something that comes "alive" when you get your 501(c)3 approved by the Feds; it emanates from us as individuals.
First there is the individual Christian; then there is the church!! It's we - as individual Christians - who are born again, not some collective entity called "the church." It's we - as individual Christians - who contain the life of Christ, not some airy abstraction we call Christianity. It's, therefore, with us - as individual Christians - that the church-life begins. The church has no standing apart from its individual members. It does not exist as some kind of separate entity which we must strive to enter. If we are Christians, we are already there.
As the storm clouds begin to gather around us, as we begin to suffer persecution not only by the "Organized Church," but by our loved ones as well, we must - as Mary did so many years ago - learn to "practice the presence of Christ:"
"Now it came to pass, as they went, that he entered into a certain village: and a certain woman named Martha received him into her house.
"And she had a sister called Mary, which also sat at Jesus' feet, and heard his word.
"But Martha was cumbered about much serving, and came to him, and said, Lord, dost thou not care that my sister hath left me to serve alone? bid her therefore that she help me.
"And Jesus answered and said unto her, Martha, Martha, thou art careful and troubled about many things:
"But one thing is needful: and Mary hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her. (Luke 10:38-42)
To this end, Jesus said,
"I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing." (John 15:5)
And this is why Jesus could say to Martha,
" Martha, Martha, thou art careful and troubled about many things: But one thing is needful: and Mary hath chosen that good part."
It, therefore, doesn't matter how alone and cut off you may feel yourself to be as you begin to be edged out of the "Organized Church," if you take care of your individual walk with Christ, if you learn to "behold and reflect Him" in your daily life, you will eventually produce the church - maybe not in a grand, organized fashion, but in the small fellowships of our daily life, in our homes, in our jobs, in our after-hours, etc. And this will happen just as surely as grapes are produced by the vine. You will find that believers and non-believers alike - will be drawn to you, and as you begin to meet with these people, the Gospel will be preached (indeed, you will find it quite impossible not to preach the Gospel), and the church-life will be effortlessly produced, and God's testimony will be upheld!! And all the killing, and all the MONEY, and all the organizing of the "Organized Church" will not be able to extinguish that testimony.
It is indeed a hard saying, but one that is nonetheless true -
"... that we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of God." (Acts 14:22)
And that, therefore, we should -
"... glory in tribulations ... knowing that tribulation worketh patience; "And patience, experience; and experience, hope: "And hope maketh not ashamed; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us." (Rom. 5:3-5)
God bless all of you!
S.R. Shearer
Antipas Ministries