WHOSE PURPOSES ARE SERVED WHEN THE
ANTICHRIST IS PORTRAYED AS A NEW
AGE GURU AND AS A MAN OF PEACE?

By: S.R. Shearer
May 8, 2012


PREFACE

The question as to whose purposes are being served when the antiChrist is deceitfully portrayed as a "New Age" guru and as a man of peace is not really that much of a mystery; it was answered in a round-about fashion more than fifty years ago by the nation's 34th president, Dwight Eisenhower, when he revealed that the very elites with whom the leaders of today's church have made "common cause" to "return the nation to Christ and the church" are the ones who benefit. The war party becomes the peace party, and the peace party becomes the war party; peace means war and war means peace. Now that's deceit; THAT'S DECEIT BIG TIME!

-- Antipas

__________________________________________

INTRODUCTION

As we suggested in our last main article, "Beware the Prophetic Daydreams of False Prophets & Empty-Headed Dreamers," there exists today a very stark dichotomy between the Bible's description of the antiChrist at "end of the age" and the portrait of the antiChrist that the leaders of today's church are presenting to their congregations; indeed, the dichotomy is so stark and so vast that it cannot help but elicit the thought in the thinking of any fair-minded individual, WHOSE PURPOSES ARE BEING SERVED BY THIS DECEIT?

The fact is, the Bible PLAINLY describes the antiChrist in terms that reveal him as a bloody man of war; specifically as:

  • The Bloody and Deceitful Man (Ps. 5:6)
  • The Violent One (Ps. 140:1)
  • The Desolator (Dan. 9:27)
  • The Wicked One (Ps. 10:2-4)
  • The Adversary (Ps. 74:8-10)
  • The Spoiler (Isa. 16:4; Jer. 4:26)
  • The Nail (Isa. 22:25)
  • The Vile Person (Dan. 11:21)
  • The Son of Perdition (2 Thess. 2:3)
  • The Beast (Rev. 11:7)
  • The King of Fierce Countenance (Dan. 8:23)

Where, then, does one get the idea that antiChrist will present himself as a "Man of Peace?" - certainly not in any of these titles and appellations. [We urge you to see our last article, "Beware the Prophetic Daydreams of False Prophets & Empty-Headed Dreamers."]

These are NOT signs of the antiChrist

 

These are signs of the antiChrist

Moreover, antiChrist is being portrayed to the church as possessing -

  • A hostility toward Israel;

  • A hostility toward the church;

  • A hostility toward the military;

  • A deference towards Islam.

But the fact is, NONE of these ideas are supported by the Bible; instead the Bible says that -

  • He will promote himself as Israel's champion. (Dan. 9:27)

  • He will deceive God's people (i.e., the Christians) by posing as their champion insofar as their social policies are concerned. (Rev. 17:3; please also see Matt. 24:24)

  • He will put his trust in military power. (Dan. 11:38)

  • He will oppose a confederacy of ISLAMIC nations that will array themselves against Israel in the "Latter Days") [Ezek. 38:1 - 39:25; (cf. Ezek. 38:15; 39:2) Dan. 11:40; Joel 2:1-27 (cf. Joel 2:20) Isa. 10:12; 30:31-33; 31:8-9].

In addition to all this, the leaders of today's church are dishonestly depicting the antiChrist as supporting the aspirations of such "New Age" values as militant feminism - the kind of feminism that "destroys the family," "emasculates men," and leads to "out-of-control sexual deviations" such as gay pride, gays and women in the military, etc.

AntiChrist as a warrior-king

But once again, NONE of this is supported by the Bible; instead, just the OPPOSITE - Daniel 11:38 plainly states -

"... he [ANTICHRIST] shall NOT regard the desire of women ..." (Daniel 11:38) [We urge you to see our article, "The War against Women."]

To the exact contrary, the Bible presents him as a great warrior-king - a SUPERMAN, who, as the Resitiutor Orbis, stands ready to emerge and rescue Christianity from the chaos and confusion of "this present evil world."

So once again, we ask the question, WHOSE PURPOSES ARE BEING SERVED BY PRESENTING ANTICHRIST IN SUCH A NON-BIBLICAL FASHION? - A FASHION THAT STANDS IN UTTER JUXTAPOSITION TO THE BIBLE. 

EISENHOWER ANSWERED THE QUESTION
M
ORE THAN FIFTY YEARS AGO

President Dwight David Eisenhower, the nation's 34th President, best answered this question more than fifty year ago when, on January 17, 1961, he gave his "Farewell Address" to the nation in which he warned America and indeed the world about the growing influence of a developing NATIONAL SECURITY STATE THAT WAS CENTERED NOT IN THE UNITED NATIONS, NOT IN EUROPE, BUT IN THE UNITED STATES; he referred to this nexus of power as "the military-industrial complex." [Please see our articles, "The Evil in Our Midst," and "The Men Who Gathered Themselves Together at Clint Murchison's Dallas Home Forty-Five Years Ago."]

Eisenhower warned:

"Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

"This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

"We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together."

NOTE: Eisenhower was speaking from the point of view of having first-hand knowledge of this influence in the corridors of power. He was warning against the influence of the interconnected relationship and organized power of the military, government, and industry; that the growing influence of this 'complex' was so vast that it threatened to take over the government and subvert democracy itself.

This was not the "Farewell Address" that he had been "scheduled" to give; indeed, he would have been stopped if he had let people know what he was going to do. When he got to his desk and faced the TV cameras, he folded the address he was "scheduled" to give, laid it aside and drew out of his inside coat pocket the address he actually gave (see above). The country was aghast. After his address, he left and never explained himself.

THE ENORMITY OF THIS COMPLEX

And just how enormous the "military-industrial complex" has grown since Eisenhower's warning to the nation fifty years ago can best be understood when one attempts to comprehend the incredible fact that AMERICA'S MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX NOW CONSUMES 94% OF ALL FEDERAL INCOME TAX REVENUES WHEN THE COST OF ITS INCESSANT "WARS OF EMPIRE" ARE ADDED TO THE DEFENSE BUDGET. [Please see APPENDIX 1 from an article by Christopher Hellman that appeared not in any US paper, but in a French paper - Le Monde Diplomatique.]

No wonder there is a budget deficit - and it has little or nothing to do with Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and so-called "discretionary spending;" the attempt by America's elites to "palm off" the reason for America's enormous budget deficit on these budgetary items is so dishonest that it borders on being shameful. 

Now stop and think about this for a moment: America's "military-industrial complex consumes 94% OF ALL FEDERAL INCOME TAX REVENUES!!

Indeed, America spends more on "defense" than almost all the other nations of the earth combined - and, again, that's not counting what it spends on its incessant "Wars of Empire."

Please note the fact that the above chart does not include the money America spends on the battlefield; if this expenditure were included along with the other "budgetary items" listed in APPENDIX 1, then the US would be shown to be spending more than eighty percent of the money the world spends on defense.

NO WONDER THE ELITES AND THE "CHURCHMEN" WHO OPERATE AS THEIR LACKEYS WANT TO "PLAY-DOWN" THE BIBLICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ANTICHRIST AS A MAN OF WAR: SUCH A CHARACTERIZATION WOULD CLEARLY FIX THEM AS "FRONTMEN" FOR THE ANTICHRIST; AND NO WONDER THEY WANT TO TURN THE BIBLE UPSIDE DOWN AND PORTRAY ANTICHRIST AS A "MAN OF PEACE;" PLAINLY THEY ARE SPEAKING HERE IN ORWELLIAN "NEWSPEAK" WHERE "WAR MEANS PEACE," "FREEDOM MEANS SLAVERY" AND "IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH."

HOW IS THE "CON" CARRIED OUT?

And exactly how is this "con" carried out? - to a very large extent, it has been carried out by playing on the mythology of the American Christian community that ties America's destiny with God's "Plan and Purpose in the Ages." But America has NOTHING to do with God; it is instead SATAN'S MASTERPIECE, HIS "NEW JERUSALEM" (AS IT WERE). NONETHELESS, THAT WAS THE MYTHOLOGY THAT RONALD REAGAN USED WHEN HE CALLED AMERICA "A SHINING CITY ON A HILL" - A REFERENCE TO MATTHEW 5:14; AND THAT WAS THE MYTHOLOGY SENATOR ALBERT BEVERIDGE OF INDIANA (1862 - 1927) USED WHEN HE SAID THAT AMERICA HAD A "MANIFEST DESTINY" TO -

"ACT AS THE TRUSTEE OF GOD, TO BRING CIVILIZATION TO THE WORLD AND TO ACT IN ITS REGENERATION ..."

NOTE: We URGE you to see Chapter XII of the New Antipas Papers, "The Beast of Revelation 17;" please also see our articles, "The Third World as a Model for the New World Order" (which has been published in Iran), "The American Empire: The Corporate / Pentagon / CIA / Missionary Archipelago," "A Dreadful Nation: An Overflowing Scourge," "The Congo and American Greed," "Lee Kyang: The Rich and the Poor! God and America," "Inside the American New World Order System" and "Christians in Africa: Awake!" Please also see our movie, "GREED IS GOOD." We urge you to see APPENDIX 2, "America: Satan's Grand Creation."

ONE IS FORCED ...

If - despite all the biblical evidence to the contrary - one once accepts the belief that America is "God's Redeemer Nation," then one is FORCED to turn the Bible upside down; one is FORCED to turn the antiChrist into some kind of "New Age" guru; one is FORCED to explain antiChrist as a leader of some kind of toothless combination of nations such as the United Nations or the European Community of Nations.

But I tell you the truth when I say this: when one does this, for example, when one ignores the Scriptures which plainly reveal antiChrist as:

  • The Bloody and Deceitful Man (Ps. 5:6)
  • The Violent One (Ps. 140:1)
  • The Desolator (Dan 9:27)
  • The Wicked One (Ps. 10:2-4)
  • The Adversary (Ps. 74:8-10)
  • The Spoiler (Isa. 16:4; Jer. 4:26)
  • The Nail (Isa. 22:25)
  • The Vile Person (Dan. 11:21)
  • The Son of Perdition (2 Thess. 2:3)
  • The Beast (Rev. 11:7)
  • The King of Fierce Countenance (Dan. 8:23)

- and when one ignores the Scriptures that plainly reveal him as anything but a "leftie" espousing "New Age" values such as militant feminism and homosexuality rather than as the SUPERMAN he plainly is depicted as - and on and on and on - then there will be a price for YOU to pay in the not too distant future.

I SAY AGAIN ...

AND SO I SAY AGAIN, FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO SAY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO SEE WHOSE PURPOSES ARE BEING SERVED WHEN ANTICHRIST IS PORTRAYED IN THE WAY THE LEADERS OF TODAY'S CHURCH ARE DOING, JUST LOOK AROUND YOU: THEY ARE NOT HIDDEN BEHIND SOME FAÇADE OR MASK AS NINCOMPOOPS SUCH AS TEXE MARRS, PAT ROBERTSON, JEFF RENSE ET. AL WANT YOU TO BELIEVE; THEY ARE PRECISELY THE "RICHIE-RICHES" YOU HAVE ALLIED YOURSELF WITH IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.

They are not hidden behind such mysterious groups as the Illuminati, the Bohemian Grove, the Bilderberger Group, etc. NONE OF THESE GROUPS HAVE ANY BIBLICAL BASIS WHATSOEVER.

If YOU don't see this, then it is YOUR fault, and it is to YOU that Jesus was speaking when He said:

"This people's heart is waxed gross, And their ears are dull of hearing, And their eyes they have closed; Lest haply they should perceive with their eyes, And hear with their ears, And understand with their heart, And should turn again, And I should heal them." (Matthew 13:15)

-----------------------------------------

APPENDIX 1

The real U.S. national security budget
The figure no one wants you to see

by Christopher Hellman

Manipulating the budget and lying to the American people

What if you went to a restaurant and found it rather pricey? Still, you ordered your meal and, when done, picked up the check only to discover that it was almost twice the menu price.

Welcome to the world of the real U.S. national security budget. Normally, in media accounts, you hear about the Pentagon budget and the war-fighting supplementary funds passed by Congress for our conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. That already gets you into a startling price range — close to $700 billion for 2012 — but that's barely more than half of it. If Americans were ever presented with the real bill for the total U.S. national security budget, it would actually add up to more than $1.2 trillion a year.

Take that in for a moment. It's true; you won't find that figure in your daily newspaper or on your nightly newscast, but it's no misprint. It may even be an underestimate. In any case, it's the real thing when it comes to your tax dollars. The simplest way to grasp just how Americans could pay such a staggering amount annually for "security" is to go through what we know about the U.S. national security budget, step by step, and add it all up.

So, here we go. Buckle your seat belt:
it's going to be a bumpy ride.

Discovering what the REAL defense budget is

Fortunately for us, on February 14th the Obama administration officially released its Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 budget request. Of course, it hasn't been passed by Congress — even the 2011 budget hasn't made it through that august body yet — but at least we have the most recent figures available for our calculations.

For 2012, the White House has requested $558 billion for the Pentagon's annual "base" budget, plus an additional $118 billion to fund military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. At $676 billion, that's already nothing to sneeze at, but it's just the barest of beginnings when it comes to what American taxpayers will actually spend on national security. Think of it as the gigantic tip of a humongous iceberg.

To get closer to a real figure, it's necessary to start peeking at other parts of the federal budget where so many other pots of security spending are squirreled away.

Missing from the Pentagon's budget request, for example, is an additional $19.3 billion for nuclear-weapons-related activities like making sure our current stockpile of warheads will work as expected and cleaning up the waste created by seven decades of developing and producing them. That money, however, officially falls in the province of the Department of Energy. And then, don't forget an additional $7.8 billion that the Pentagon lumps into a "miscellaneous" category — a kind of department of chump change — that is included in neither its base budget nor those war-fighting funds.

So, even though we're barely started, we've already hit a total official FY 2012 Pentagon budget request of:

$703.1 billion dollars.

Not usually included in national security spending are hundreds of billions of dollars that American taxpayers are asked to spend to pay for past wars, and to support our current and future national security strategy.

For starters, that $117.8 billion war-funding request for the Department of Defense doesn't include certain actual "war-related fighting" costs. Take, for instance, the counterterrorism activities of the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development. For the first time, just as with the Pentagon budget, the FY 2012 request divides what's called "International Affairs" in two: that is, into an annual "base" budget as well as funding for "Overseas Contingency Operations" related to Iraq and Afghanistan. (In the Bush years, these used to be called the Global War on Terror.) The State Department's contribution? $8.7 billion. That brings the grand but very partial total so far to:

$711.8 billion.

The White House has also requested $71.6 billion for a post-2001 category called "homeland security" — of which $18.1 billion is funded through the Department of Defense. The remaining $53.5 billion goes through various other federal accounts, including the Department of Homeland Security ($37 billion), the Department of Health and Human Services ($4.6 billion), and the Department of Justice ($4.6 billion). All of it is, however, national security funding which brings our total to:

$765.3 billion.

The U.S. intelligence budget was technically classified prior to 2007, although at roughly $40 billion annually, it was considered one of the worst-kept secrets in Washington. Since then, as a result of recommendations by the 9/11 Commission, Congress has required that the government reveal the total amount spent on intelligence work related to the National Intelligence Program (NIP).

This work done by federal agencies like the CIA and the National Security Agency consists of keeping an eye on and trying to understand what other nations are doing and thinking, as well as a broad range of "covert operations" such as those being conducted in Pakistan. In this area, we won't have figures until FY 2012 ends. The latest NIP funding figure we do have is $53.1 billion for FY 2010. There's little question that the FY 2012 figure will be higher, but let's be safe and stick with what we know. (Keep in mind that the government spends plenty more on "intelligence." Additional funds for the Military Intelligence Program (MIP), however, are already included in the Pentagon's 2012 base budget and war-fighting supplemental, though we don't know what they are. The FY 2010 funding for MIP, again the latest figure available, was $27 billion.) In any case, add that $53.1 billion and we're at:

$818.4 billion.

Veterans programs are an important part of the national security budget with the projected funding figure for 2012 being $129.3 billion. Of this, $59 billion is for veterans' hospital and medical care, $70.3 billion for disability pensions and education programs. This category of national security funding has been growing rapidly in recent years because of the soaring medical-care needs of veterans of the Iraq and Afghan wars. According to an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office, by 2020 total funding for health-care services for veterans will have risen another 45%-75%. In the meantime, for 2012 we've reached:

$947.7 billion.

If you include the part of the foreign affairs budget not directly related to U.S. military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as other counterterrorism operations, you have an additional $18 billion in direct security spending. Of this, $6.6 billion is for military aid to foreign countries, while almost $2 billion goes for "international peacekeeping" operations. A further $709 million has been designated for countering the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, combating terrorism, and clearing landmines planted in regional conflicts around the globe. This leaves us at:

$965.7 billion.

As with all federal retirees, U.S. military retirees and former civilian Department of Defense employees receive pension benefits from the government. The 2012 figure is $48.5 billion for military personnel, $20 billion for those civilian employees, which means we've now hit:

$1,034.2 billion. (Yes, that's $1.03 trillion!)

When the federal government lacks sufficient funds to pay all of its obligations, it borrows. Each year, it must pay the interest on this debt which, for FY 2012, is projected at $474.1 billion. The National Priorities Project calculates that 39% of that, or $185 billion, comes from borrowing related to past Pentagon spending.

Add it all together and the grand total for the known national security budget of the United States is:

$1,219.2 billion. (That's more than $1.2 trillion.)

A country with a gross domestic product of $1.2 trillion would have the 15th largest economy in the world, ranking between Canada and Indonesia, and ahead of Australia, Taiwan, the Netherlands, and Saudi Arabia. Still, don't for a second think that $1.2 trillion is the actual grand total for what the U.S. government spends on national security. Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld once famously spoke of the world's "known unknowns." Explaining the phrase this way: "That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know." It's a concept that couldn't apply better to the budget he once oversaw. When it comes to U.S. national security spending, there are some relevant numbers we know are out there, even if we simply can't calculate them.

To take one example, how much of NASA's proposed $18.7 billion budget falls under national security spending? We know that the agency works closely with the Pentagon. NASA satellite launches often occur from the Air Force's facilities at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California and Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. The Air Force has its own satellite launch capability, but how much of that comes as a result of NASA technology and support? In dollars terms, we just don't know.

Other "known unknowns" would include portions of the State Department budget. One assumes that at least some of its diplomatic initiatives promote our security interests. Similarly, we have no figure for the pensions of non-Pentagon federal retirees who worked on security issues for the Department of Homeland Security, the State Department, or the Departments of Justice and Treasury. Nor do we have figures for the interest on moneys borrowed to fund veterans' benefits, among other national security-related matters. The bill for such known unknowns could easily run into the tens of billions of dollars annually, putting the full national security budget over the $1.3 trillion mark or even higher.

There's a simple principle here. American taxpayers should know just what they are paying for. In a restaurant, a customer would be outraged to receive a check almost twice as high as the menu promised. We have no idea whether the same would be true in the world of national security spending, because Americans are never told what national security actually means at the cash register.

-----------------------------------------

APPENDIX 2

AMERICA:
SATAN'S GRAND CREATION

No doubt, many Christians - especially American Christians - will revolt at the thought that "America is Satan's grand creation and that he has directed all of his strength and ingenuity into causing it to flourish." There are, after all, so many "good" things about America. They fail to recognize, however, that when the Bible speaks of "this world" (Gk. Kosmos), the term encompasses ALL that is of this life and of this present world; everything: both the "good" and the "bad;" the beautiful and the ugly, the sweet and the bitter - i.e., all those goods, endowments, riches, advantages, pleasures, etc. which, though hollow and fleeting, stir our desires and make us feel "at home" and "comfortable" in (with) this life.

Feeling at home in this world.

Moreover, the Bible's use of the word kosmos indicates that it has in view more than just the material world; that it's view of the "world" encompasses abstract things as well which have spiritual and moral value (e.g., I Cor 2:12, "the spirit of the world;" 3:19, "the wisdom of this world;" 7:31, "the fashion of this world;" Titus 2:12, "worldly lusts;" 2 Peter 1:14, "the corruption that is in the world;" 2:20, "the defilements of the world;" I John 2:16, 17, "all that is in the world, the lust ... the vainglory ... passeth away;" etc.).

"If any man loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him." (John 2:15)

There are no exceptions - both the "good" and the bad," the "spiritual" and the "material" are included; it is, therefore, futile for those who think that asceticism is a way out; a special means or path to holiness and purity, and that if they somehow or other avoid the material things of this life, they will escape the lusts thereof. Nothing could be further from the truth. Asceticism is just another road to corruption - and a very uncomfortable one at that.

Why?  Because when Adam sinned, he brought ALL the world - again, the "good" and the "bad," the "material" as well as the "abstract" - under the curse of sin. As a result, and regardless of the differing guises in which the world may from time to time present itself (and no matter how it tries to hide its real character), it is IMPLACABLY hostile to God. The Bible is very clear on this matter: I Corinthians 1:21 says that the world "knows not God" - and more than that, John 14:17 says that it is not even capable of receiving (i.e., competent or able to comprehend) "the Spirit of Christ." Indeed, John 15:18 says that the world "HATES" Christ. John puts it this way:

"If any man loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him." (John 2:15)

MANIFEST DESTINY: Bringing Christian civilization to the savages.

Christians confuse "worldliness" with "carnality" (i.e., the "bad" of this world - e.g., lust, lewdness, eroticism, sensuality, etc. - and even such mundane things as watching TV, going to the movies, listening to "rock and roll" music, etc.) - and, as a result, they naively think that if they can avoid carnality everything will be okay; AND MORE SPECIFICALLY, IF THEY CAN RID AMERICA OF THE "BAD" (so to speak) EVERYTHING WILL "WORK OUT."  And isn't this exactly what Christian leaders such as Robert Stearns, Mike Bickle, Reuven Doron, Che Ahn, Frank Hammond, Cindy Jacobs, Bill Hamon, John Eckhardt, Bobbie Byerly, Dutch Sheets, Jim Goll, John Paul Jackson, James Ryle, Frank Damazio, Ed Silvoso, Carlos Annacondia, Claudio Freidzon, Roger Mitchell, Paul Cain, Chuck Pierce, Rick Joyner, Kingsley Fletcher, Barbara Wentroble, ad infinitum are attempting to do? - DRIVE EVIL (AS THEY UNDERSTAND IT) OUT OF AMERICA: When, for example, Harold Caballeros says:

"When a territory has been inhabited by persons who have chosen to offer their worship to demons, the land has been contaminated and those territorial spirits have obtained a right to remain there, keeping the inhabitants captive. It is then necessary to identify the enemy and to go into spiritual battle until we obtain victory and redeem the territory."

This, of course, is exactly what America was doing to its "native-American" population when it "cleansed the land" of these so-called "blood-thirsty savages" - "instruments of the devil" who were standing in the way of white Christianity's "MANIFEST DESTINY to act as "agents of God."

How white, European Christians viewed themselves: As bearers of Christianity and civilization (left); what "Native Americans" thought of the Christianity that whites brought to the "New World." (right)

This is PRECISELY the kind of Christianity (so-called) that has "turned off" so many in the world to the message of the gentle carpenter of Nazareth.

This is the kind of Christianity that white Christians practiced against the Cherokee Nation in 1838; an "Indian" Nation that had long before accepted Christ into their hearts, but who were, nonetheless, treated as "savages."

This is the kind of Christianity that was practiced against Chief Joseph and the Nez Percé Indian Nation when in 1863, following a gold rush into Nez Percé territory, the federal government seized almost six million acres of Nez Percé land and attempted to "resettle" them on a reservation in Idaho that was only one tenth the size of their former reservation.

Chief Joseph, upon hearing of this treachery, denounced the United States, destroyed his American flag and burned his Bible. If this is what Christianity was all about, Chief Joseph and the Nez Percé wanted nothing to do with it.

The Cherokee nation on the "trail of tears (left); Chief Joseph and the Nez PercÚ being forced back to their tiny "reservation" in Idaho (right).

AND WHEN THIS KIND OF CHRISTIANITY - THE KIND THAT HAS LINKED ITSELF TO THE BLOODY TREACHERY OF "MANIFEST DESTINY" - CLAIMS THAT IT (AND THE NATION THAT IT HAS UNITED ITSELF TO, AND WE SPEAK SPECIFICALLY OF THE AMERICAN NEW WORLD ORDER SYSTEM) IS GOD'S REPRESENTATIVE ON EARTH, THEN GOD MUST ACT TO EXPOSE THIS CLAIM (AND THOSE WHO SUPPORT IT) FOR WHAT IT (THEY) REALLY IS: A FRAUD AND A DECEIT!

Invoking the name of Christ in a CRIMINAL activity


God bless you all!

S.R. Shearer
Antipas Ministries

***

IN ADDITION, WE URGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD THE NEW ANTIPAS PAPERS, PRINT THEM OUT YOURSELF, AND STUDY THEM CAREFULLY; SHARE THEM WITH YOUR FRIENDS.

YOU MAY DOWNLOAD THEM FREE!

***

FINALLY, WE URGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD AND PRINT OUT THE FLYER WE SENT TO YOU RECENTLY.

YOU MAY DOWNLOAD THE FLYER HERE

Then make copies and take these copies out to the campuses where you live; pass them out; OR if that seems too "daring" for you right now, post them on telephone poles, the sides of buildings, on campus bulletin boards; post them in union halls, in the neighborhoods of the poor and downtrodden, near employment offices, wherever you can.


Once again, we URGE you to read (or re-read):

We need your help to spread the word concerning Antipas Ministries and the eschatological viewpoint it represents; WE NEED YOUR HELP BECAUSE WE DO NOT "LINK" WITH OTHER SO-CALLED "CHRISTIAN" WEBSITES which are, for the most part, "in the tank" insofar as their loyalty to the United States is concerned - a loyalty that has made them partners in the BLOODY trail the American military has left in its TERROR-RIDDEN rampage throughout the world, as well as making them partners in the abject poverty that American corporations have imposed on the peoples and nations the American military machine has ravaged - A BLOODY, TERROR-RIDDEN RAMPAGE THAT HAS TO A LARGE DEGREE BEEN CARRIED OUT IN THE NAME OF THE "PRINCE OF PEACE." [Please see our articles, "The Third World as a Model for the New World Order," Inside the American New World Order System" and "The American Empire: The Corporate / Pentagon / CIA / Missionary Archipelago."]

YOU CAN HELP BY EMAILING THIS ARTICLE TO
YOUR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS

PRESS HERE


HOME | ARTICLES | ABOUT US | SUPPORT US | CONTACT US
© Antipas Ministries