GUN FIGHT AT DU PONT CIRCLE
On the morning of November 9 (at 9:58 AM), a gun fight erupted near the White House. The next day, CBS News reported the incident under the title "Attempted Robbery Leads to Shots Fired Near White House." The extremely brief report read as follows:
Later in the day, a TV account on a local station reported the involvement of two other cars in addition to the Lincoln in the gun battle: a Porsche and a Jaguar.
A gun fight outside the White House involving three late model luxury cars driven by white males in an area swarming with presidential security details? – and this is passed off as an ordinary robbery attempt? That's ridiculous on the face of it.
One would have to be "smoking grass" or be high on other "medicinal drugs" or "Jim Beam" to buy off on this explanation. The belief that thieves would pick a location just outside the gates of the White House – possibly the most secure location in the country, and known to be that - to attempt an ordinary robbery defies reason. Moreover, the thought that people driving a Porsche or a Jaguar would be trying to rip off someone driving a Lincoln is equally ludicrous – kind of like one "richy-rich robbing another "richy-rich." Since these ridiculous initial reports, the story has disappeared (quashed) from the news, and eye witnesses to the gun battle are refusing to talk. A "cone of silence" has descended on the incident.
GRU ANALYSIS OF WHAT
Main Intelligence Directorate, or the GRU in Russian (for Glavnoye Razvedy-vatelnoye Upravleniye) is the foreign military intelligence directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
NOTE: Naturally enough, the GRU would have as one of its principle objectives in the United States keeping track of General Petraeus and carefully monitoring his movements. It should thus come as no surprise that it would have had a handle on what really happened early on.
This story was repeated by the European Times and similar publications in Europe. Related reports have appeared in China and Israel.
GRU analysts remarked that Obama's heavy-handed and harsh moves against Petraeus and his (Obama's) rebellious military most closely resembled those actions taken by President Franklin Roosevelt in 1933 against those involved in what is now referred to as "The Business Plot" engineered by wealthy American businessmen who were plotting to create a fascist veterans' organization and use it in a coup d'état to overthrow Roosevelt.
More thought-provoking than even that is the "tid-bit" of information (a tid-bit that had never before surfaced) that emerged as part of this report connected to a second comparison the GRU made: that Obama's firing of Petraeus also resembled the 1961 firing of CIA Director Allen Dulles (1893-1969) by President John F. Kennedy (1917-1963): the tid-bit was this: that Russian Intelligence believed that Dulles engineered the assassination of Kennedy. A portent of things to come insofar as Obama is concerned? Ironically, Dulles then got himself named as a central member of the Warren Commission investigation into Kennedy's assassination – an investigation that blamed Kennedy's murder on a "lone gunman."
NOTE: The attempted coup against Roosevelt is described in Charles Higham's book, Trading With The Enemy. Higham is a biographer and a former New York Times writer. Higham writes:
This gives one an idea of the deadly intent of the American elites TO LET NO ONE STAND IN THEIR WAY - not even the U.S. President. One should bear in mind what Higham says: "Not for the first or last time in his (i.e., Roosevelt's) career, he was aware that there were powers greater than he in the United States." [We URGE you to see our articles, MK-Ultra: The Search for the Manchurian Candidate, A Study of the Mindset behind Today's New World Order," "Conspiracy Theories," "Now Is The Time To Do Something; It May Be Too Late Tomorrow," and "The Elite, Money, and the End of Days."]
Under great pressure to jail and charge with treason the many top US Military officers after the failed 1933 coup attempt, this report says, Roosevelt, instead, opted to simply oust those Generals and other high-ranking officers in order to spare his country the turmoil such a revelation would cause among the American people.
PASSING OUT OF
In a number of past articles we have spoken about the fact that - prophetically speaking - we are in a kind of "IN-BETWEEN-TIME" - a time when prophetic events seem to go into slow motion; when great and contradictory forces that are raging against one another seem to abate - though not completely; just enough to give people a sense that time is on their side; this is certainly what many "do-nothing" Christians believe today. These are those about whom the Apostle Peter wrote:
And so now we come to the importance of the gun battle that erupted near the White House on November 9 of last year: THINGS ARE COMING TO A VIOLENT HEAD. We seem to be passing out of the "IN-BETWEEN TIME" that we have been in for some time now.
For the past several years the country has been split between the Left-Wing of the Democratic Party (and their allies – committed secular-humanists, feminists, labor activists and non-white minorities) and the Right-Wing of the Republican Party (and their allies - the Religious-Right, the financial elites and so-called "tea-party patriots").
This has led to an almost complete paralysis of the government. Karl Grossman of Newsday comments on this paralysis:
"The 112th Congress, which ended this week, 'is set to go down in American history as the most unproductive session since the 1940s', wrote Amanda Terkel last week on The Huffington Post."
However, the re-election of President Barak Obama may have changed this equation – with the advantage going to Obama – and that's because Obama has begun playing politics "CHICAGO-STYLE."
"Chicago-style politics" is a byword used to designate a set of characteristics associated to the less commendable aspects of the recent political history of the city of Chicago. The term has been employed by conservative Republican politicians and pundits to characterize Obama's offensive "tough, take-no-prisoners approach to politics" – a style of politics that has begun to successfully demonize Republicans, the Religious Right and so-called "tea party activists." [We URGE you to see our article, "The Left: Seeking to Destroy the Right Root and Branch."]
Pulitzer Prize-winning author Charles Krauthammer explains what is happening in his theory of ideological "Ascendancy:"
"It is common for one party to take control and enact its ideological agenda. Ascendancy, however, occurs only when the opposition inevitably regains power and then proceeds to accept the basic premises of the preceding revolution. Thus, Republicans railed for 20 years against the New Deal. Yet when they regained the White House in 1953, they kept the New Deal intact.
"[But] when Reagan became president, he declared that 'government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem'. Having thus rhetorically rejected the very premise of the New Deal/Great Society, he set about attacking its foundations — with radical tax reduction, major deregulation, a frontal challenge to unionism (breaking the air traffic controllers for striking illegally) and an attempt at restraining government growth ..."
The New Deal was a series of economic programs enacted in the United States between 1933 and 1936. They involved presidential executive orders or laws passed by Congress during the first term of President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The programs were in response to the Great Depression, and focused on what historians call the "3 Rs": Relief, Recovery, and Reform. That is, Relief for the unemployed and poor; Recovery of the economy to normal levels; and Reform of the financial system to prevent a repeat depression. The New Deal produced a political realignment, making the Democratic Party the majority (as well as the party that held the White House for seven out of nine Presidential terms from 1933 to 1969). The realignment crystallized into the New Deal Coalition that dominated most presidential elections into the 1960s. By 1936 the term "liberal" typically was used for supporters of the New Deal, and "conservative" for its opponents.
"... Obama's intention has always been to re-normalize, to reverse ideological course, to be the anti-Reagan — the author of a new liberal ascendancy. Nor did he hide his ambition. In his February 2009 address to Congress he declared his intention to transform America. This was no abstraction. He would do it in three areas: health care, education and energy ...
"An Obama second term means that the movement toward European-style social democracy continues, in part by legislation, in part by executive decree. The American experiment — the more individualistic, energetic, innovative, risk-taking model of democratic governance — continues to recede, yielding to the supervised life of the entitlement state ..."
Deneen Borelli writes:
The question, then, is: How does the government get from where it is today – ie., as an anti-military, anti-Israeli, anti-Christian, anti-business, pro-jihadist government – to just the opposite in the relatively near future – i.e., as a pro-military, pro-Israeli, pro-Christian, pro-business, anti-jihadist government? [Please see our recent article, "Obama's Mid-East Policy: Making Peace with Islam by Throwing Israel under the Bus."]
Put another way, given the fact that the Right has very little chance in battling the Left at the ballot box --- based as the Left is on its new "ENTITLEMENT COALITION," a coalition that supposedly "LEECHES" off the "FREEBIES" the government gives them, at the ballot box --- how can the Right gain the ascendancy and install a Right-Wing government that is favorable to the business community, the oil elites, the Christian Right, Israel, etc.; one that will resemble the biblical description of Babylon the Great as given in the Apocalypse (See description in box below). [Please see our article, "Whose Purposes Are Being Served When the AntiChrist Is Portrayed as a New Age Guru and as a Man of Peace."]
DESCRIPTION OF THE ANTICHRIST
There exists today a very stark dichotomy between the Bible's description of the antiChrist at "end of the age" and the portrait of the antiChrist that the leaders of today's church are presenting to their congregations. The fact is, the Bible PLAINLY describes the antiChrist in terms that reveal him as a bloody man of war; specifically as:
Where, then, does one get the idea that antiChrist will present himself as a "Man of Peace?" - certainly not in any of these titles and appellations.
Moreover, antiChrist is being portrayed to the church as possessing -
But the fact is, NONE of these ideas are supported by the Bible; instead the Bible says that -
VERY OBVIOUSLY, THE ONLY WAY IS THROUGH THE GUNS OF THE MILITARY AS WELL AS THE USE OF THE MASSIVE AMOUNT OF DOLLARS THAT THE BUSINESS AND OIL ELITES CAN MAKE AVAILABLE TO THE EFFORT – that plus the willingness to use these assets in a ruthless and brutal fashion.
This requirement for quick, VIOLENT action by the Right against the Left is made all the more imperative by Obama's growing effort to gut the military. This attempt results partly from his effort to feed entitlements to his constituency by taking funds from the defense budget and feeding these funds into entitlements.
The so-called "ENTITLEMENT" society that "LEECHES" off the "FREEBIES" the government gives them - an "ENTITLEMENT" society that believes that it is the duty of the government to provide for us in every aspect of our lives BECAUSE IT IS OWED TO US.
BUT IT ALSO STEMS FROM THE FACT THAT HE IS WELL AWARE THAT THE MILITARY HATES AND DETESTS HIM - AND IF HE IS TO SURVIVE, HE MUST NEUTRALIZE IT BEFORE IT (AND THE ALLIES ASSOCIATED WITH IT) CAN DO TO HIM WHAT THEY DID FIFTY YEARS AGO TO KENNEDY. [Please see our recent article, "The Reichstag Fire of 1933 and the Twin Towers of 9-11: Portents of Things to Come."]
HENCE, OBAMA'S AGGRESSIVE AND VIOLENT EFFORT TO ARREST GENERAL PETRAEUS IN DU PONT CIRCLE LAST NOVEMBER, AND THE SPEED AT WHICH HE MOVED AGAINST THE OTHERS INVOLVED IN THE COUP ATTEMPT.
NOTE: As was the case with Roosevelt in 1933, the military officers involved in the coup attempt have been released – but they all have been removed from command and are being very carefully monitored by the FBI, which – unlike the CIA – is loyal to Obama.
If Obama is successful in gutting the military, then the dreams by the oil elites for the untold wealth of the Islamic world as well as the lust of the business elites for the wealth of the Third World will go up in smoke. And more than that, the nightmare of the Christian Right and patriot groups throughout the country regarding America's submission to the United Nations, the World Court and similar institutions would undoubtedly materialize.
OBAMA: Burning the constitution and submitting the U.S. military to the United Nations - THE NIGHTMARE OF CHRISTIAN AND PATRIOT GROUPS.
It thus becomes clear that the Right must act quickly!
IN ADDITION, WE URGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD THE NEW ANTIPAS PAPERS, PRINT THEM OUT YOURSELF, AND STUDY THEM CAREFULLY; SHARE THEM WITH YOUR FRIENDS.
FINALLY, WE URGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD AND PRINT OUT THE FLYER WE SENT TO YOU RECENTLY.
Then make copies and take these copies out to the campuses where you live; pass them out; OR if that seems too "daring" for you right now, post them on telephone poles, the sides of buildings, on campus bulletin boards; post them in union halls, in the neighborhoods of the poor and downtrodden, near employment offices, wherever you can.
Once again, we URGE you to read (or re-read):
We need your help to spread the word concerning Antipas Ministries and the eschatological viewpoint it represents; WE NEED YOUR HELP BECAUSE WE DO NOT "LINK" WITH OTHER SO-CALLED "CHRISTIAN" WEBSITES which are, for the most part, "in the tank" insofar as their loyalty to the United States is concerned - a loyalty that has made them partners in the BLOODY trail the American military has left in its TERROR-RIDDEN rampage throughout the world, as well as making them partners in the abject poverty that American corporations have imposed on the peoples and nations the American military machine has ravaged - A BLOODY, TERROR-RIDDEN RAMPAGE THAT HAS TO A LARGE DEGREE BEEN CARRIED OUT IN THE NAME OF THE "PRINCE OF PEACE." [Please see our articles, "The Third World as a Model for the New World Order," Inside the American New World Order System" and "The American Empire: The Corporate / Pentagon / CIA / Missionary Archipelago."]
YOU CAN HELP BY EMAILING
THIS ARTICLE TO