GUN FIGHT AT DU PONT CIRCLE

[The struggle between Right & Left is turning violent]

By: S.R. Shearer
February 2, 2013

THE ASSASSINATION OF CAESAR,
the Ides of March (March 15), 44 BC

The attempted assassination of an American Caesar [Please see our articles, "Obama Draws First Blood," Seven Days in May" and "There Are Seven Kings."]


PREFACE

For some time now the world has been teetering on the edge of the TRIBULATION PERIOD – resisting (as it were) the spiritual forces that are pushing it inexorably toward the precipice and the unmitigated HORROR that lies waiting for all those who enter its precincts.

NOTE: Please Chapter IX of the NEW ANTIPAS PAPERS, "The Course and Character of the Last Days" for a biblical description of the TRIBULATION PERIOD.

BUT the world cannot much longer resist these forces  -  "principalities," "powers," and "world-rulers of darkness" who, though unseen and little suspected by most people, control our destinies. These are the "spiritual authorities" about whom the Apostle Paul wrote:

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high (i.e., heavenly) places." (Ephesians 6:12)

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high (i.e., heavenly) places." (Ephesians 6:12)

As a result of the obscurity behind which these "spiritual authorities" secret themselves, getting to the bottom of just how close we are to the TRIBULATION PERIOD is not an easy thing to do; the fact is, everything is being done by these "authorities" to hide what's happening. Take, for example, the manner in which the elites in both the Democratic and Republican Parties have attempted to conceal the attempted coup by the military against President Obama last September. And their purpose? – to hide from average people the growing chaos and violence into which the country is sinking; chaos and violence that has the capacity to catalyze the overthrow of the government and the installation of a dictatorship. [Please see our article, "Seven Days in May."]

Overlaying the attempt by the Democratic Party elite to obscure these facts from the American people has been their desperate effort to cover up the truth THAT THE MILITARY SO DISDAINS AND LOATHES OBAMA THAT THEY WERE WILLING TO RISK INVOLVING THEMSELVES IN A COUP D'ETAT DIRECTED AGAINST HIM. THIS KIND OF "REVELATION" WOULD HAVE CAUSED THE NATION TO EXPLODE – with dangerous results in both directions.

On the other hand, the Republican Party elites are desperate to conceal the fact that certain elements in the country CONNECTED TO THEM were involved in the coup attempt. [Again, we URGE you to see our article, "Seven Days in May."]

Nonetheless, one would be very dim-witted indeed to allow this subterfuge to cloud his view of what's happening, and to lead one to under-estimate how close the world is to the beginning of the TRIBULATION PERIOD.

The truth is, the tension between the Right and the Left which is energizing this violence is fast reaching the breaking point AND NOTHING REVEALS THIS MORE THAN A GUN FIGHT THAT TOOK PLACE RECENTLY AT DU PONT CIRCLE IN WASHINGTON D.C. – a gun battle which plainly indicates that General Petraeus (the supposed leader of the coup attempt) did not resign the CIA and go "willingly into that dark night" as the mainstream media would have us believe; a gun fight that reveals just how violent things have gotten between the Right and the Left in America.

4th Army PSYCOPS Team: Note the slogan: "PERSUADE, CHANGE, INFLUENCE."

Oh? – you've never about this gun battle? Well, that's not surprising. Sadly, it seems that today the most reliable information about what's happening in the United States has to be gleaned from foreign sources. And the reason? - because America's mass media has morphed into nothing more than one enormous propaganda machine for America's elites and the U.S. government which those elites ultimately control. [Please see our article, "The Mainline Media: One Enormous Propaganda Machine."]

Take, for example, the collusion that took place between the government and CNN during the Kosovo "crisis" in the 1990s: the Dutch newspaper Trouw and the French magazine Intelligence Newsletter reported that during the Kosovo intervention, the U.S. Army's 4th Psychological Operations (PSYOPS) Group brazenly placed its own people in CNN's headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia, to help in the "production of news" relating to the war. The "collaboration" between CNN and PSYOPS was later confirmed by Major Thomas Collins of the U.S. Army Information Service. [Please see Alternative Press Review, "Bits and Pieces," (Spring, 2000) pg. 8.]

Please see articles below:

U.S. Special Operations Command: the government went further and called for even more "aggressive measures" in spreading the "government (i.e., corporate) line" regarding critical matters on the elite's foreign and domestic agenda, and suggested that more "control" over the internet and private commercial satellites - coupled with a greater ability to wage electronic warfare against disobedient media - was also needed to push that agenda forward.

But instead of condemning this conspiracy between the government and the media, spokesmen hailed the CNN / U.S. government collusion of the news regarding Kosovo as the kind of "cooperation" the government was looking for insofar as the other major media are concerned. Indeed, at a recent closed-door symposium on "Special Operations" in Arlington, Virginia, the government went further and called for even more "aggressive measures" in spreading the "government (i.e., corporate) line" regarding critical matters of the elite's foreign and domestic agenda, and suggested that more "control" over the internet and private commercial satellites - coupled with a greater ability to wage electronic warfare against disobedient media - was also needed to push that agenda forward.

Not only that, but high ranking officers of the U.S.  talked about developing a methodology that eventually could be used to bring down "an informational cone of silence" on defiant and otherwise fractious members of the media - apparently (according to Alternative Press Review) a subtle reference to what they did in Serbia when the U.S. bombed the Serbian state television RTS in Belgrade (which killed fourteen people). Another SOCOM official suggested that NATO should have gone further and taken out the independent Serbian radio station B-92 since their coverage had not always conformed to official NATO propaganda, and had - as a result - occasionally embarrassed NATO briefers trying to get out the "party line" at various times during the conflict. ALL THIS OCCURRED MORE THAN TWENTY YEARS AGO; ONE CAN ONLY IMAGINE HOW MUCH TIGHTER THE ELITE / MEDIA COLLUSION IS TODAY. [Again, we URGE you to see our articles, "There Are Seven Kings" and "Seven Days in May."]

-- Antipas


____________________________________

GUN FIGHT AT DU PONT CIRCLE


INTRODUCTION

On the morning of November 9 (at 9:58 AM), a gun fight erupted near the White House. The next day, CBS News reported the incident under the title "Attempted Robbery Leads to Shots Fired Near White House." The extremely brief report read as follows:

"WASHINGTON (CBS-DC) – An attempted robbery near DuPont Circle Friday morning led to shots being fired near the White House, and now police are hunting four suspects. D.C. police say they are looking for four armed males driving a silver or white Lincoln ... Gun shots were fired, but no one was struck. It is unclear who fired the shots ..."

Du Pont Circle

Later in the day, a TV account on a local station reported the involvement of two other cars in addition to the Lincoln in the gun battle: a Porsche and a Jaguar.

A gun fight outside the White House involving three late model luxury cars driven by white males in an area swarming with presidential security details? – and this is passed off as an ordinary robbery attempt? That's ridiculous on the face of it.

Do these cars look like the kind of cars ordinary thieves would be driving? It seems that today one is required to suspend "common sense" to buy into the stories emanating out of the mainline press.

One would have to be "smoking grass" or be high on other "medicinal drugs" or "Jim Beam" to buy off on this explanation. The belief that thieves would pick a location just outside the gates of the White House – possibly the most secure location in the country, and known to be that - to attempt an ordinary robbery defies reason. Moreover, the thought that people driving a Porsche or a Jaguar would be trying to rip off someone driving a Lincoln is equally ludicrous – kind of like one "richy-rich robbing another "richy-rich."  Since these ridiculous initial reports, the story has disappeared (quashed) from the news, and eye witnesses to the gun battle are refusing to talk. A "cone of silence" has descended on the incident.

GRU ANALYSIS OF WHAT
HAPPENED AT DU PONT CIRCLE

THE WAY THE INCIDENT IS BEING
REPORTED OUTSIDE THE U.S.

Interestingly, however, this is not the way the incident is being reported outside the U.S: According to Russia's Main Intelligence Directorate (the GRU) the gun battle involved under-cover FBI operatives who were attempting to arrest General Petraeus.  

Main Intelligence Directorate, or the GRU in Russian (for Glavnoye Razvedy-vatelnoye Upravleniye) is the foreign military intelligence directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

NOTE: Naturally enough, the GRU would have as one of its principle objectives in the United States keeping track of General Petraeus and carefully monitoring his movements. It should thus come as no surprise that it would have had a handle on what really happened early on.

This story was repeated by the European Times and similar publications in Europe. Related reports have appeared in China and Israel.

GRU analysts remarked that Obama's heavy-handed and harsh moves against Petraeus and his (Obama's) rebellious military most closely resembled those actions taken by President Franklin Roosevelt in 1933 against those involved in what is now referred to as "The Business Plot" engineered by wealthy American businessmen who were plotting to create a fascist veterans' organization and use it in a coup d'état to overthrow Roosevelt.

More thought-provoking than even that is the "tid-bit" of information (a tid-bit that had never before surfaced) that emerged as part of this report connected to a second comparison the GRU made: that Obama's firing of Petraeus also resembled the 1961 firing of CIA Director Allen Dulles (1893-1969) by President John F. Kennedy (1917-1963): the tid-bit was this: that Russian Intelligence believed that Dulles engineered the assassination of Kennedy. A portent of things to come insofar as Obama is concerned?  Ironically, Dulles then got himself named as a central member of the Warren Commission investigation into Kennedy's assassination – an investigation that blamed Kennedy's murder on a "lone gunman."

General Butler

NOTE: The attempted coup against Roosevelt is described in Charles Higham's book, Trading With The Enemy. Higham is a biographer and a former New York Times writer. Higham writes:

"Early in 1934, Irenee DuPont and Knudsen (the head of General Motors) reached their explosion point over President Roosevelt (and what they believed were his socialist New Deal policies). Along with friends of the Morgan Bank and General Motors, certain DuPont backers financed a coup de'etat that would overthrow the President with the aid of a $3 million-funded army of terrorists, modeled on the fascist movement in Paris known as the Croix de Feu. Who was to be the figurehead for this ill-advised scheme, which would result in Roosevelt being forced to take orders from businessmen as part of a fascist government or face the alternative of imprisonment and execution? DuPont men allegedly held an urgent series of meetings with the Morgans. They finally settled on one of the most popular soldiers in America, General Smedley Butler of Pennsylvania. Butler, a brave hero, had been awarded two Congressional Medals of Honor and his brilliant career as commandant of the Marine Corps had made him a legend. He would, the conspiratorial group felt, make an ideal replacement for Roosevelt if the latter proved difficult. The backers of the bizarre conspiracy selected a smooth attorney, Gerald MacGuire, to bring word of the plan to General Butler. MacGuire agreed Butler would be the perfect choice. Butler had attacked the New Deal in public speeches.

"MacGuire met with Butler in the latter's house in Newton Square, Pennsylvania, and in a hotel suite nearby. With great intensity the fascist attorney delivered the scheme to the general. Butler was horrified. Although there were many things about Roosevelt he disliked, a coup de'etat amounted to treason, and Butler was nothing if not loyal to the Constitution. However, he disclosed nothing of his feelings. With masterful composure he pretended interest and waited to hear more. When MacGuire returned, it was with news of more millions and more extravagant plans, which included turning America into a dictatorship with Butler as a kind of Hitler. Once more Butler was infuriated but kept quiet. After MacGuire left on the second occasion, the general got in touch with the White House. He told Roosevelt of the entire plan.

"Roosevelt's state of mind can scarcely be imagined. He knew that in view of the backing from high banking sources, this matter could not be dismissed as some crackpot enterprise that had no chance of success. He was well aware of the powerful forces of fascism [that existed in the American business community and some church circles] that could easily make America an ally of Nazism even that early, only one year after Hitler had risen to power. [Please see our article on the fascist collusion between the church and American business in the 1930s, "Henry Ford and Gerald L.K. Smith: Business Right And Religious Right."]

Irénée du Pont
Du Pont Chemicals

William Knudson
General Motors

J.P. Morgan
Morgan Bank

In what can only be described as history making a full circle, the JP Morgan banking empire that financed the attempted coup against Roosevelt in 1933 appears to be behind the US Military's plan to oust Obama too. According to the European Times, the $5.8 billion trading loss JP Morgan reported last year has been traced by Russian finance experts to a "great number" of shell companies under the control of former US Military officers who intend to use the money in another coup attempt. Who will win this titanic struggle, the European Times doesn't say. But, it does grimly note that where the coup against Roosevelt in 1933 failed, these plotters have probably learned the lesson of their failure making them less likely to fail again.

"On the other hand, Roosevelt also knew that if he were to arrest the leaders of the houses of Morgan and DuPont, it would create an unthinkable national crisis and perhaps another Wall Street crash. NOT FOR THE FIRST OR LAST TIME IN HIS CAREER, HE WAS AWARE THAT THERE WERE POWERS GREATER THAN HE IN THE UNITED STATES [This is a fact that JFK was to find out twenty-nine years later; please see our articles, "MK-ULTRA and the Search for the Manchurian Candidate" and "Conspiracy Theories."]

This gives one an idea of the deadly intent of the American elites TO LET NO ONE STAND IN THEIR WAY - not even the U.S. President. One should bear in mind what Higham says: "Not for the first or last time in his (i.e., Roosevelt's) career, he was aware that there were powers greater than he in the United States." [We URGE you to see our articles, MK-Ultra: The Search for the Manchurian Candidate, A Study of the Mindset behind Today's New World Order," "Conspiracy Theories," "Now Is The Time To Do Something; It May Be Too Late Tomorrow," and "The Elite, Money, and the End of Days."]

Under great pressure to jail and charge with treason the many top US Military officers after the failed 1933 coup attempt, this report says, Roosevelt, instead, opted to simply oust those Generals and other high-ranking officers in order to spare his country the turmoil such a revelation would cause among the American people.

THINGS ARE COMING TO A VIOLENT
HEAD BETWEEN LEFT & RIGHT

THINGS ARE COMING TO A VIOLENT HEAD

WE ARE PASSING OUT OF
THE "IN-BETWEEN TIME"

In a number of past articles we have spoken about the fact that - prophetically speaking - we are in a kind of "IN-BETWEEN-TIME" - a time when prophetic events seem to go into slow motion; when great and contradictory forces that are raging against one another seem to abate - though not completely; just enough to give people a sense that time is on their side; this is certainly what many "do-nothing" Christians believe today. These are those about whom the Apostle Peter wrote:

"Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts [self-serving desires],

"And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were ..." (2 Peter 3:3-4)

And so now we come to the importance of the gun battle that erupted near the White House on November 9 of last year: THINGS ARE COMING TO A VIOLENT HEAD. We seem to be passing out of the "IN-BETWEEN TIME"  that we have been in for some time now.

For the past several years the country has been split between the Left-Wing of the Democratic Party (and their allies – committed secular-humanists, feminists, labor activists and non-white minorities) and the Right-Wing of the Republican Party (and their allies - the Religious-Right, the financial elites and so-called "tea-party patriots").

This has led to an almost complete paralysis of the government. Karl Grossman of Newsday comments on this paralysis:

"The 112th Congress, which ended this week, 'is set to go down in American history as the most unproductive session since the 1940s', wrote Amanda Terkel last week on The Huffington Post."

THE LEFT / RIGHT
EQUATION HAS CHANGED

However, the re-election of President Barak Obama may have changed this equation – with the advantage going to Obama – and that's because Obama has begun playing politics "CHICAGO-STYLE."

"Chicago-style politics" is a byword used to designate a set of characteristics associated to the less commendable aspects of the recent political history of the city of Chicago. The term has been employed by conservative Republican politicians and pundits to characterize Obama's offensive "tough, take-no-prisoners approach to politics" – a style of politics that has begun to successfully demonize Republicans, the Religious Right and so-called "tea party activists." [We URGE you to see our article, "The Left: Seeking to Destroy the Right Root and Branch."]

Pulitzer Prize-winning author Charles Krauthammer explains what is happening in his theory of ideological "Ascendancy:"

"It is common for one party to take control and enact its ideological agenda. Ascendancy, however, occurs only when the opposition inevitably regains power and then proceeds to accept the basic premises of the preceding revolution. Thus, Republicans railed for 20 years against the New Deal. Yet when they regained the White House in 1953, they kept the New Deal intact.

"[But] when Reagan became president, he declared that 'government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem'. Having thus rhetorically rejected the very premise of the New Deal/Great Society, he set about attacking its foundations — with radical tax reduction, major deregulation, a frontal challenge to unionism (breaking the air traffic controllers for striking illegally) and an attempt at restraining government growth ..."

The New Deal was a series of economic programs enacted in the United States between 1933 and 1936. They involved presidential executive orders or laws passed by Congress during the first term of President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The programs were in response to the Great Depression, and focused on what historians call the "3 Rs": Relief, Recovery, and Reform. That is, Relief for the unemployed and poor; Recovery of the economy to normal levels; and Reform of the financial system to prevent a repeat depression. The New Deal produced a political realignment, making the Democratic Party the majority (as well as the party that held the White House for seven out of nine Presidential terms from 1933 to 1969). The realignment crystallized into the New Deal Coalition that dominated most presidential elections into the 1960s. By 1936 the term "liberal" typically was used for supporters of the New Deal, and "conservative" for its opponents.

Krauthammer continues:

"... Obama's intention has always been to re-normalize, to reverse ideological course, to be the anti-Reagan — the author of a new liberal ascendancy. Nor did he hide his ambition. In his February 2009 address to Congress he declared his intention to transform America. This was no abstraction. He would do it in three areas: health care, education and energy ...

"An Obama second term means that the movement toward European-style social democracy continues, in part by legislation, in part by executive decree. The American experiment — the more individualistic, energetic, innovative, risk-taking model of democratic governance — continues to recede, yielding to the supervised life of the entitlement state ..."

Deneen Borelli writes:

When Mother Jones Magazine leaked a video of Mitt Romney at a May 2012 fundraiser explaining that he won't be able to reach some voters "who are dependent on government" and "who believe that they are entitled to healthcare, to food, to housing, to you name it," they threw gasoline onto the liberal media machine that has been working diligently to characterize Romney as a cold-hearted profiteer.

Seizing the opportunity, the Obama campaign converted the Romney tape into a political ad, reinforcing the Republican candidate's negative image in the press. Delivery aside, Romney's basic point was right — America has become an entitlement society, and those on the receiving end of government support will vote for Obama.

THE RIGHT HAS NO CHOICE BUT TO RESORT
TO VIOLENCE TO GAIN THE ASCENDANCY

GETTING FROM "HERE" TO "THERE"

The question, then, is: How does the government get from where it is today – ie., as an anti-military, anti-Israeli, anti-Christian, anti-business, pro-jihadist government – to just the opposite in the relatively near future – i.e., as a pro-military, pro-Israeli, pro-Christian, pro-business, anti-jihadist government? [Please see our recent article, "Obama's Mid-East Policy: Making Peace with Islam by Throwing Israel under the Bus."]

Put another way, given the fact that the Right has very little chance in battling the Left at the ballot box --- based as the Left is on its new "ENTITLEMENT COALITION," a coalition that supposedly "LEECHES" off the "FREEBIES" the government gives them, at the ballot box --- how can the Right gain the ascendancy and install a Right-Wing government that is favorable to the business community, the oil elites, the Christian Right, Israel, etc.;  one that will resemble the biblical description of Babylon the Great as given in the Apocalypse (See description in box below). [Please see our article, "Whose Purposes Are Being Served When the AntiChrist Is Portrayed as a New Age Guru and as a Man of Peace."]

DESCRIPTION OF THE ANTICHRIST
[There is no correlations with Obama]

There exists today a very stark dichotomy between the Bible's description of the antiChrist at "end of the age" and the portrait of the antiChrist that the leaders of today's church are presenting to their congregations. The fact is, the Bible PLAINLY describes the antiChrist in terms that reveal him as a bloody man of war; specifically as:

  • The Bloody and Deceitful Man (Ps. 5:6)
  • The Violent One (Ps. 140:1)
  • The Desolator (Dan. 9:27)
  • The Wicked One (Ps. 10:2-4)
  • The Adversary (Ps. 74:8-10)
  • The Spoiler (Isa. 16:4; Jer. 4:26)
  • The Nail (Isa. 22:25)
  • The Vile Person (Dan. 11:21)
  • The Son of Perdition (2 Thess. 2:3)
  • The Beast (Rev. 11:7)
  • The King of Fierce Countenance (Dan. 8:23)

Where, then, does one get the idea that antiChrist will present himself as a "Man of Peace?" - certainly not in any of these titles and appellations.

Moreover, antiChrist is being portrayed to the church as possessing -

  • A hostility toward Israel;
  • A hostility toward the church;
  • A hostility toward the military;
  • A deference towards Islam

But the fact is, NONE of these ideas are supported by the Bible; instead the Bible says that -

  • He will promote himself as Israel's champion. (Dan. 9:27)
  • He will deceive God's people (i.e., the Christians) by posing as their champion insofar as their social policies are concerned. (Rev. 17:3; please also see Matt. 24:24)
  • He will put his trust in military power. (Dan. 11:38)
  • He will oppose a confederacy of ISLAMIC nations that will array themselves against Israel in the "Latter Days") [Ezek. 38:1 - 39:25; (cf. Ezek. 38:15; 39:2) Dan. 11:40; Joel 2:1-27 (cf. Joel 2:20) Isa. 10:12; 30:31-33; 31:8-9].

VERY OBVIOUSLY, THE ONLY WAY IS THROUGH THE GUNS OF THE MILITARY AS WELL AS THE USE OF THE MASSIVE AMOUNT OF DOLLARS THAT THE BUSINESS AND OIL ELITES CAN MAKE AVAILABLE TO THE EFFORT – that plus the willingness to use these assets in a ruthless and brutal fashion.

QUICK ACTION IS
IMPERATIVE FOR THE RIGHT

This requirement for quick, VIOLENT action by the Right against the Left is made all the more imperative by Obama's growing effort to gut the military. This attempt results partly from his effort to feed entitlements to his constituency by taking funds from the defense budget and feeding these funds into entitlements.

The so-called "ENTITLEMENT" society that "LEECHES" off the "FREEBIES" the government gives them - an "ENTITLEMENT" society that believes that it is the duty of the government to provide for us in every aspect of our lives BECAUSE IT IS OWED TO US.

BUT IT ALSO STEMS FROM THE FACT THAT HE IS WELL AWARE THAT THE MILITARY HATES AND DETESTS HIM - AND IF HE IS TO SURVIVE, HE MUST NEUTRALIZE IT BEFORE IT (AND THE ALLIES ASSOCIATED WITH IT) CAN DO TO HIM WHAT THEY DID FIFTY YEARS AGO TO KENNEDY. [Please see our recent article, "The Reichstag Fire of 1933 and the Twin Towers of 9-11: Portents of Things to Come."]

HENCE, OBAMA'S AGGRESSIVE AND VIOLENT EFFORT TO ARREST GENERAL PETRAEUS IN DU PONT CIRCLE LAST NOVEMBER, AND THE SPEED AT WHICH HE MOVED AGAINST THE OTHERS INVOLVED IN THE COUP ATTEMPT.

NOTE: As was the case with Roosevelt in 1933, the military officers involved in the coup attempt have been released – but they all have been removed from command and are being very carefully monitored by the FBI, which – unlike the CIA – is loyal to Obama.

If Obama is successful in gutting the military, then the dreams by the oil elites for the untold wealth of the Islamic world as well as the lust of the business elites for the wealth of the Third World will go up in smoke. And more than that, the nightmare of the Christian Right and patriot groups throughout the country regarding America's submission to the United Nations, the World Court and similar institutions would undoubtedly materialize.

OBAMA: Burning the constitution and submitting the U.S. military to the United Nations - THE NIGHTMARE OF CHRISTIAN AND PATRIOT GROUPS.

It thus becomes clear that the Right must act quickly!

HOLD ON TO YOUR HATS!

______________________________________

S.R. Shearer
Antipas Ministries

***

IN ADDITION, WE URGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD THE NEW ANTIPAS PAPERS, PRINT THEM OUT YOURSELF, AND STUDY THEM CAREFULLY; SHARE THEM WITH YOUR FRIENDS.

YOU MAY DOWNLOAD THEM FREE!

***

FINALLY, WE URGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD AND PRINT OUT THE FLYER WE SENT TO YOU RECENTLY.

YOU MAY DOWNLOAD THE FLYER HERE

Then make copies and take these copies out to the campuses where you live; pass them out; OR if that seems too "daring" for you right now, post them on telephone poles, the sides of buildings, on campus bulletin boards; post them in union halls, in the neighborhoods of the poor and downtrodden, near employment offices, wherever you can.


Once again, we URGE you to read (or re-read):

We need your help to spread the word concerning Antipas Ministries and the eschatological viewpoint it represents; WE NEED YOUR HELP BECAUSE WE DO NOT "LINK" WITH OTHER SO-CALLED "CHRISTIAN" WEBSITES which are, for the most part, "in the tank" insofar as their loyalty to the United States is concerned - a loyalty that has made them partners in the BLOODY trail the American military has left in its TERROR-RIDDEN rampage throughout the world, as well as making them partners in the abject poverty that American corporations have imposed on the peoples and nations the American military machine has ravaged - A BLOODY, TERROR-RIDDEN RAMPAGE THAT HAS TO A LARGE DEGREE BEEN CARRIED OUT IN THE NAME OF THE "PRINCE OF PEACE." [Please see our articles, "The Third World as a Model for the New World Order," Inside the American New World Order System" and "The American Empire: The Corporate / Pentagon / CIA / Missionary Archipelago."]

YOU CAN HELP BY EMAILING THIS ARTICLE TO
YOUR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS

PRESS HERE


HOME | ARTICLES | ABOUT US | SUPPORT US | CONTACT US
© Antipas Ministries