Creative Destruction for a
'Greater Middle East'?
by F. William Engdahl
February 5, 2011
The United States is now engaged in the Middle East
and North Africa with a process that it has labeled "CREATIVE
DESTRUCTION;" to a very large extent, this process has
been forced on the US by the Arab uprisings that are now
sweeping through the Muslim world and threatening to RADICALIZE
the area against the American New World Order System.
[Please see our article, "Confronting
the Inevitable Collapse of America's Client-State System
in the Middle East."]
The article that follows by F. William Engdahl details
the effort by the US to "tame" and co-opt the Arab uprisings
for its own purposes. [Please see our articles, "What's
Happening Now in Egypt" and "Libya:
Lies, Lies and More Lies."]
We urge you to take the time to read it and to STUDY
it carefully; the article examines the labyrinth
of NGOs and CIA FRONT organizations through which America's
elites are operating in order to placate the "Arab masses"
and bend them to their will. The maze through which this
effort is being directed consists of a series of differing
organization — religious, political, economic —
all linked to one another in intricate keiretsu-like
relationships where the same personalities appear again
and again from group to group and organization to organization;
the overlap is stunning. It's a huge and intricate net
of organizational and personal relationships in which
the same names appear in one group, disappear, and reappear
again in another; sometimes they appear simultaneously
in several different groups; sometimes one name will appear
in a position of power and influence in one gathering,
and merely as a "foot soldier" in another; then
just as suddenly the positions will reverse. It's like
looking at smoke rising from a fire on a hot, windless
day and trying to make sense of its direction and predict
the patterns which will emerge. IN ALL OF THIS, HOWEVER,
ONE CAN DISCERN THE HAND OF THE CIA.
THOSE WHO ARE PART OF THIS LABYRINTH
— INCLUDING BOTH ISRAEL AND THE AMERICAN CHRISTIAN
COMMUNITY — WILL SOME DAY SOON COME TO RUE THE DAY
THEY WERE EVER CAUGHT UP IN IT BECAUSE THEY WILL BE
BETRAYED BY IT.
Please bear in mind that this article was published
on February 5, 2011 — just after the Tunisian
revolt and before Mubarak was toppled from power
Fast on the heels of the regime change in Tunisia came a popular-based
protest movement launched on January 25 against the entrenched
order of Egypt's Hosni Mubarak. Contrary to the carefully-cultivated
impression that the US government is trying to retain the present
regime of Mubarak [which, of course, is no longer the case —
Mubarak is gone], Washington in
fact is orchestrating the Egyptian as well as other regional regime
changes from Syria to Yemen to Jordan and well beyond in a process
some refer to as "creative destruction."
F. William Engdahl
The template for such covert regime change has been developed
by the Pentagon, US intelligence agencies and various think-tanks
such as RAND Corporation over decades, beginning with the May
1968 destabilization of the de Gaulle presidency in France.
In 1967, the CIA's own Inspector General produced a
133-page internal report that implicated "every living
CIA officer who has served as chief of the clandestine
service----Allen Dulles, Richard Bissell, Richard Helms,
and Desmond Fitzgerald---in conspiracies to commit murder."
One of the CIA's targets was Charles
DeGaulle which makes one wonder, Is anyone safe from becoming
a target of a CIA assassination attempt. [Please
see our article, "The
Death of Gary Webb."]
This is the first time since the US-backed regime changes in
Eastern Europe some two decades back that Washington has initiated
simultaneous operations in so many countries in a region. It
is a strategy born of a certain desperation and one not without
significant risk for the Pentagon and for the long-term Wall
Street agenda. What the outcome will be for the peoples
of the region and for the world is as yet unclear.
Yet while the ultimate outcome of defiant street protests in
Cairo and across Egypt and the Islamic world remains unclear,
the broad outlines of a US covert strategy are already clear.
No one can dispute the genuine grievances motivating millions
to take to the streets at risk of life. No one can defend the
atrocities of the Mubarak regime and its torture and repression
of dissent. No one can dispute the explosive rise in food
prices as Chicago and Wall Street commodity speculators, and
the conversion of American farmland to the insane cultivation
of corn for ethanol fuel drive grain prices through the roof.
Egypt is the world's largest wheat importer, much of it from
the USA. Chicago wheat futures rose by a staggering 74% between
June and November 2010 leading to an Egyptian food price inflation
of some 30% despite government subsidies.
One-quarter of all
the maize (corn) and other grain crops grown in the
US now ends up as biofuel in cars rather than being
used to feed people, according to new analysis which
suggests that the biofuel revolution launched by former
President George Bush in 2007 is impacting on world
food supplies. The 2009 figures from the US Department
of Agriculture shows ethanol production rising to record
levels driven by farm subsidies and laws which require
vehicles to use increasing amounts of biofuels. "The
grain grown to produce fuel in the US [in 2009] was
enough to feed 330 million people for one year
at average world consumption levels," said Lester Brown,
the director of the Earth Policy Institute, a Washington
thinktank that conducted the analysis. Last year 107m
tons of grain, mostly corn, was grown by US farmers
to be blended with petrol. This was nearly twice as
much as in 2007, when Bush challenged farmers to increase
production by 500% by 2017 to cut oil imports and reduce
What is widely ignored in the CNN and BBC and other Western media
coverage of the Egypt events is the fact that whatever his excesses
at home, Egypt's Mubarak represented
a major obstacle within the region to the larger US agenda.
had come to be viewed as a major obstacle to US policies
in the Middle East and North Africa.
To say relations between the US government and Mubarak were
ice cold from the outset would be no exaggeration. Mubarak was
staunchly opposed to America's policies on Iran and how to deal
with its nuclear program, on America's policies towards the
Persian Gulf states, to Syria and to Lebanon as well as to the
Palestinians.  He had become a formidable thorn in
the larger Washington agenda for the entire region, Washington's
Greater Middle East Project, more recently redubbed the milder-sounding
"New Middle East."
As real as the factors are that may be driving millions into
the streets across North Africa and the Middle East, what cannot
be ignored is the fact that WASHINGTON
IS DECIDING THE TIMEING AND, AS THEY SEE IT, TRYING TO SHAPE
THE ULTIMATE OUTCOME OF COMPREHENSIVE REGIME CHANGE DESTABILIZATIONS
ACROSS THE ISLAMIC WORLD. The day of the remarkably
well-coordinated popular demonstrations demanding Mubarak step
down, key members of the Egyptian military command including
Chief of General Staff Lt. Gen. Sami Hafez Enan were all in
Washington as guests of the Pentagon. That conveniently neutralized
the decisive force of the Army to stop the anti-Mubarak protests
from growing in the critical early days. 
The strategy had been in various State Department and Pentagon
files since at least a decade or longer. After George W. Bush
declared a War on Terror in 2001 it was called the Greater Middle
East Project. Today it is known as the less threatening-sounding
"New Middle East" project. It is a strategy to break open the
states of the region from Morocco to Afghanistan.
The current Pentagon scenario for Egypt reads like a Cecil
B. DeMille Hollywood spectacular, only this one with a cast
of millions of Twitter-savvy well-trained youth, networks of
Muslim Brotherhood operatives, working with a US-trained military.
In the starring role of the new production at the moment is
none other than a Nobel Peace Prize winner who conveniently
appears to pull all the threads of opposition to the ancien
regime into what appears as a seamless transition into a
New Egypt under a self-proclaimed liberal democratic revolution.
naďve effort by the US to try to work with the Muslim
Brotherhood is emblematic of the titanic
arrogance of the American elites; it is reminiscent
of the effort by Wall Street to "tame" the FARC in Colombia
and bend it to its purposes: in June of 1999 Richard Grasso,
then president of the New York Stock Exchange, flew into
the jungles of southern Colombia and met with representatives
of FARC. Grasso told reporters he made the trip to make
clear to FARC that U.S. "financial circles"
had great interest in the "peace process," and
to this end they wanted to discuss with the FARC leadership
to end the civil war (in other words, Grasso wanted to
buy FARC off).
Now think about this for a minute!! The president of
the New York Stock Exchange and other high-level representatives
of the American financial elite flying into the jungles
of Colombia in their three-piece Armani suits to discuss
the "peace process" with people the American press
had labeled "narcotraffickers" and "drug
dealers?" [For information on the FARC, please
see our article, "Colombia:
America's New Vietnam;" please also see our article,
"Inside the American
New World Order System."]
with a FARC
commander in the jungles of Colombia
What is this?
If FARC is really what the American elites [and the elite
press (i.e., NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, The Washington Post,
The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, etc.)]
claim that it is -- a "criminal drug cartel"
-- then what is the President of the New York Stock Exchange
and the representatives of Morgan-Stanley, Citibank, Chase-Manhattan,
etc. doing talking with the fatigue-clad, gun-totting
FARC leadership? If FARC is the drug cartel the American
government has been saying that it is, than it's akin
to the presidents of these elite institutions sitting
down and talking with the Gambino crime family and other
members of the New York Mafia about how to divide New
York City up among themselves to their mutual benefit!
There is something wrong here!! Either the American
people haven't been told the truth about FARC, or the
American elites don't care about FARC's drug dealing (after
all, they don't care about the Colombian government's
drug dealing) - all they want is a deal which will free
them to pursue their economic agenda in Colombia, and
hang the consequences insofar as the "War on Drugs"
THIS IS THE SAME KIND OF ARROGANCE
THAT TODAY MAKES THE OIL ELITES THINK THEY CAN "TAME"
THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD. In the end, however, the Muslim
Brotherhood will turn on America's elites, setting the
stage for the Gog / Magog War. [Please see
our article, "Confronting
the Inevitable Collapse of America's Client-States System
in the Middle East."]
Some background on the actors on the ground is useful before
looking at what Washington's long-term strategic plan might
be for the Islamic world from North Africa to the Persian Gulf
and ultimately into the Islamic populations of Central Asia,
to the borders of China and Russia.
Washington 'soft' revolutions
The protests that led to the abrupt firing of the entire Egyptian
government by President Mubarak on the heels of the panicked
flight of Tunisia's Ben Ali into a Saudi exile are not at all
as "spontaneous" as the Obama White House, Clinton State Department
or CNN, BBC and other major media in the West make them to be.
The protests are being organized in a Ukrainian-style
high-tech electronic fashion with large internet-linked networks
of youth ... 
Sunday, December 12, 2004, Bill Schneider of CNN's "Inside
Politics" reported from Paris that all of Europe
was aflame (and very fearful) by what appeared to be the
of Viktor Yushchenko - presumably at the hands of Russia's
KGB. Yushchenko was the "darling" of the West,
the leader of the Ukraine's "Orange
Revolution," a man who had promised to once
and for all free the Ukraine from Russia's grip, open
up the country to the so-called "fresh air of Western
capitalism," and finish off the privatization process
of the Ukrainian economy. He was opposed by "Russia's
man," Viktor Yanukovich, who was portrayed by the
Western media as a dark, sinister figure who wanted to
turn the clock back to the "bad, old days" of
the Soviet Empire.
A victory for Yanukovich was pictured by the Western
media as the start of a Russian "re-conquest"
of the Ukraine and a Russian comeback in Eastern Europe.
The story was "played" for all its worth! The
Western media was full of before-and-after pictures of
the once handsome Yushchenko: the sight of his puffy,
ravaged face, pitted with ugly pustules, was not a pretty
and after pictures of Yushchenko
Something was surely wrong — it was there for
all the world to see; three months beforehand, however,
Yushchenko had been examined at a hospital in Vienna,
Austria regarding what was happening to his face, and
the New York Times reported that at that time the
hospital found that the -
"... accusation that he (Yushchenko) had been
poisoned was baseless."
What happened in the interim? - i.e., between the
time when the hospital claimed Yushchenko had not been
poisoned (the middle of September) and when the hospital
reversed its original diagnoses (mid December). A WHOLE
LOT OF DEATH THREATS directed at the team of doctor's
involved in the diagnosis - that's what happened! Moreover,
others were threatened as well - for example, a Ukrainian
parliament member who served on a commission investigating
the incident, and who had publicly dismissed the idea
of Yushchenko's poisoning, had a land mine placed outside
Why all the death threats? Who was behind them? Most
in the West - with the New York Times and the Wall
Street Journal taking the lead - claimed that the
KGB was behind them. But if the KGB had been behind the
poisoning, surely they would not have wanted their handiwork
confirmed. They would have been happy at the hospital's
original diagnosis (i.e., that there had been no poisoning),
Yushchenko's subsequent death, and the quiet ascension
of Russia's man, Viktor Yanukovich, to the presidency.
But that's not what was happening; whoever "poisoned"
Yushchenko wanted the world to know about it.
THEY WANTED A DIAGNOSIS OF POISONING, AND THEY WANTED
THE BLAME TO FALL ON RUSSIA'S KGB - and that's precisely
what happened with the reversal of the hospital's first
diagnosis. The doctors had gotten the message, and had decided
as a result that what Yushchenko was suffering from after
all was poisoning - dioxin poisoning - and a mysterious
"third party" was involved (by implication, the
KGB). ONCE AGAIN, EUROPE CONVULSED IN FEAR - AND ALL EYES
TURNED TO RUSSIA! Was "Mother Russia" up to her
A sophisticated and brilliantly conceived
... (American) creation ... (that was) FUNDED
AND ORGANIZED BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT deploying
U.S. consultancies, pollsters, diplomats, the two
big American parties and U.S. funded non-government
But it wasn't
Russia that was behind what was going on in the Ukraine;
it was instead an effort by the CIA to "BUILD DEMOCRACY;"
it was part of a gigantic Public Relations campaign that
was, as Ian Taylor of London's Guardian Newspaper
described it, a very -
"... sophisticated and brilliantly
conceived ... (American) creation ... (that was) FUNDED
AND ORGANIZED BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT deploying U.S.
consultancies, pollsters, diplomats, the two big American
[political] parties and U.S. funded non-government organizations
Jonathan Steele elaborates,
"'American advisors' had been directing and
funding the entire Yushchenko operation, just as they
had done in the former Yugoslavia, with money pouring
in from the U.S. Treasury ..."
And it was not just the U.S. government per se
that was behind Yushchenko's candidacy; the roster read
like a Who's Who of the world's richy-riches: John
"The (American) New World Order strategists
are determined to put their man in control of the Ukraine
... These national strategic interests are, as ever,
supported by the private interests of the powerful ...
(led by) Conoco Phillips - the strategic ally of Chevron,
on whose board Condoleezza Rice sat for many years ..."
did that make Yushchenko's "Orange
Revolution" out to be? - A "PEOPLE'S
REVOLUTION" THAT WAS FLYING THE CORPORATE FLAGS OF
CONOCO-PHILLIPS AND CHEVRON OIL. [Please see our articles
on the machinations of Chevron Oil in the intrigues that
encompass the oil fields of the Trans-Caucasus region
and the Caspian Sea, "The
Caucasus Mountains, Gog, Magog, and Chevron Oil;
also please see our article, "The
Elite's Explanation of What's Happening in Chechnya."]
Traynor reported that the so-called "Orange
Revolution" that had been unleashed in the
Ukraine was an exact copy of the
campaign that had been let loose in Belgrade against Slobodan
Milosevic was targeted because he refused to knuckle
under to the demands of the United States to "privatize"
Yugoslavia's economy and sell it off to the Americans.
The campaign to demonize and finally overturn Milosevic
- first by breaking up the Yugoslav Federation and then
toppling him by "BUILDING DEMOCRACY" in Serbia
proper - was masterful. [Please see our article, "Reducing
Europe to the Status of Greece In The Days Rome"
for a history of America's military campaign against Milosevic.]
person in charge of this campaign was Richard Mills, the
U.S. Ambassador to Belgrade. The operation was run out
of a dingy office in the center of the Serbian capital;
it was staffed by computer-literate young people who called
themselves the Center for Non-violent Resistance. They
were all part of the Otpor Movement, which means "resistance."
Otpor used a potent, simple slogan that suddenly appeared
everywhere in Serbia in 2000 - the two words "gotov
je," meaning "he's finished," a reference
to Milosevic. A logo of a black-and-white clenched fist
completed the brilliant "trademark." [Similar
logos have "popped up" in Belarus, Georgia,
and so forth; for example, in the Ukraine, the logo was
a ticking clock with the words "his time is up"
- meaning that Yanukovich's time was up.]
The operation was funded by the U.S. government operating
through a number of "front organizations" such
as USAID, etc., and NGOs like the Freedom House and the
Open Society Institute. In addition, the anti-Mubarak
movement had all the footprints of another US-backed regime
change along the model of the 2003-2004 Color Revolutions
in Georgia and Ukraine - the failed Green
Revolution against Iran's Ahmedinejad in 2009.
The call for an Egyptian general strike and a January 25
Day of Anger that sparked the mass protests demanding Mubarak
resign was issued by a Facebook-based organization calling itself
the "April 6 Movement." The protests were so substantial
and well-organized that it forced Mubarak to ask his cabinet
to resign and appoint a new vice president, Gen. Omar Suleiman,
former Minister of Intelligence.
April 6 is headed by one Ahmed Maher Ibrahim, a 29-year-old
civil engineer, who set up the Facebook site to support a workers'
call for a strike on April 6, 2008.
Ahmed Maher Ibrahim - who is part of
the Zbigniew Brzezinski cabal centered around Egyptian
presidential candidate ElBaradei
(see 3rd NOTE below)
was an earlier CIA attempt to topple Mubarak because of
his intransigence, which evidences the fact that the attempt
now against Mubarak is merely another try to topple him
— using the Arab uprisings as a cover.
According to a New York Times account from 2009, some
800,000 Egyptians, most youth, were already then Facebook or
Twitter members. In an interview with the Washington-based Carnegie
Endowment [another organization frequently used as "cover" by
the CIA], "April 6 Movement" head Maher stated, "Being the first
youth movement in Egypt to use internet-based modes of communication
like Facebook and Twitter, we aim to promote democracy by encouraging
public involvement in the political process." 
"April 6 Movement" was conceived at a youth meeting in
New York from December 3—5, 2008, called the "Alliance
of Youth Movements Summit." The meeting was organized
by the State Department. Investigative journalist Matt
"Facebook has million and millions of users worldwide,
is worth billions of dollars; it was funded in part
by the CIA with money routed through a number of conservative
corporations including Accel Partners, National Venture
Capital Association, Q-Tel and BNN Technologies."
FOR MORE INFORMATION
ON FACEBOOK'S RELATIONSHIP
WITH THE CIA, PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING VIDEO:
Maher also announced that his "April 6 Movement" backs former
UN International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) head and declared
Egyptian Presidential candidate, along with ElBaradei's National
Association for Change (NAC) coalition. The NAC includes among
others George Ishak, a leader in Kefaya Movement, and Mohamed
Saad El-Katatni, president of the parliamentary bloc of the
controversial Ikhwan or Muslim Brotherhood. 
ElBaradei at this point is being projected as the central figure
in a future Egyptian parliamentary democratic change. Curiously,
though he has not lived in Egypt for the past thirty years,
he has won the backing of every imaginable part of the Egyptian
political spectrum from communists to Muslim Brotherhood to
Kefaya and April 6 young activists.  Judging from
the calm demeanor ElBaradei presents these days to CNN interviewers,
he also likely has the backing of leading Egyptian generals
opposed to the Mubarak rule for whatever reasons as well as
some very influential persons in Washington.
Los Angeles Times reports that, according to its sources,
Mohamed ElBaradei is another a CIA stooge. ElBaradei is
known to be closely connected to Zbigniew Brzezinski.
- a CIA stooge and a close confidant to former Secretary
of State, Zbigniew Brzezinski.
Paul Joseph Watson, a frequent contributor to Canada's
Global Research, writes:
"It became known in Brzezinski's globalist circles
at least three years ago that Egypt was teetering on
the edge of revolt and that another political entity
would fill the inevitable vacuum of power if the elite
didn't get ahead of the game. That's why the American
Embassy trained rebel leaders to infiltrate opposition
groups from the very beginning, as Britain's Daily
Telegraph revealed on Saturday.
"The geopolitical maneuverings of the US military-industrial
complex don't take away from the fact that the revolt
in Egypt is driven by genuine grievances relating to
spiraling food prices, high unemployment, policy brutality
and the grass-roots drive to unseat a 30 year dictatorship."
Watson goes on to say -
"However, if they [meaning the Egyptian people]
allow globalist carpetbagger Mohammed ElBaradei to seize
power, demonstrators are ensuring that their actions
are in vain and ultimately worthless. Addressing protesters
in Cairo yesterday, ElBaradei demanded Mubarak step
down and promised 'change within days'.
"'You are the owners of this revolution. You are
the future', ElBaradei declared. 'Our essential demand
is the departure of the regime and the beginning of
a new Egypt in which each Egyptian lives in virtue,
freedom and dignity'.
"Egyptians may be the owners of the revolution,
but the owners of ElBaradei himself are busy hijacking
that revolution by installing a puppet that will be
just as compliant with Egypt continuing as a globalist
client state as Mubarak has been for the past 30 years.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss."
Kefaya—Pentagon 'non-violent warfare'
Kefaya is at the heart of mobilizing the Egyptian protest demonstrations
that back ElBaradei's candidacy. The word Kefaya translates
The logo for Kefaya
is a "knockoff" of the "Enough" poster used by the CIA
during the so-called Rose
Revolution in Georgia.
Curiously, the planners at the Washington National Endowment
for Democracy (NED)  and related color revolution
NGOs apparently were bereft of creative new catchy names for
their Egyptian Color Revolution. In their November 2003 Rose
Revolution in Georgia, the US-financed NGOs chose
the catch word, Kmara! In order to identify the youth-based
regime change movement. Kmara in Georgian also means "enough!"
Like Kefaya, Kmara in Georgia was also built by the Washington-financed
trainers from the NED and other groups such as Gene Sharp's
misleadingly-named Albert Einstein Institution which uses what
Sharp once identified as "non-violence as a method of warfare."
 [We URGE
you to read our recent article, "Libya:
Lies, Lies and More Lies" for information on the Albert
Einstein Institute — which is, naturally enough, another
CIA FRONT organization.]
The various youth networks in Georgia as in Kefaya were carefully
trained as a loose, decentralized network of cells, deliberately
avoiding a central organization that could be broken and could
have brought the movement to a halt. Training of activists in
techniques of non-violent resistance was done at sports facilities,
making it appear innocuous. Activists were also given training
in political marketing, media relations, mobilization and recruiting
The formal name of Kefaya is "Egyptian Movement for Change."
It was founded in 2004 by select Egyptian intellectuals at the
home of Abu 'l-Ala Madi, leader of the al-Wasat party, a party
reportedly created by the Muslim Brotherhood.  Kefaya
was created as a coalition movement united only by the call
for an end Mubarak's rule.
is but another example of the CIA's dangerous game of
"playing around" with the Muslim Brotherhood — AN
EFFORT THAT THE BIBLE SUGGESTS WILL END IN ABJECT FAILURE
FOR THE US — a failure that will leave the US with
only one other option — the annihilation
of the Muslim people, which is what the Gog / Magog
War is all about.
as part of the amorphous "April 6 Movement," capitalized early
on new social media and digital technology as its main means
of mobilization. In particular, political blogging, posting
uncensored youtube shorts and photographic images were skillfully
and extremely professionally used. At a rally already back in
December 2009 Kefaya had announced support for the candidacy
of Mohammed ElBaradei for the 2011 Egyptian elections. 
RAND and Kefaya
No less a US defense establishment think-tank than the RAND
Corporation has conducted a detailed study of Kefaya. The Kefaya
study, as RAND themselves noted, was "sponsored by the Office
of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant
Commands, the Department of the Navy, the Marine Corps, the
defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community." 
of the things that solidified the Rand Corporation's evil
reputation in the eyes of the public was the release of
the Stanley Kubrick film Dr. Strangelove or: How
I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb in 1964.
The movie's title character, a deranged Nazi scientist,
was modeled after RAND's eccentric Herman Kahn. A military
strategist, Kahn famously argued that America could easily
survive an all-out conflict with the Soviet Union if people
took refuge in shelters and rationed food. Although the
radiation would cause hundreds of thousands of genetic defects,
Kahn insisted the American people would endure. Kahn's apocalyptic
scenarios didn't end there. He also dreamed up the Doomsday
Machine, a device that could destroy all life on Earth,
which Kubrick used in Dr. Strangelove. In fact, Kubrick
borrowed so many of Kahn's sayings and ideas that the scientist
began demanding royalties. Kahn was so persistent that Kubrick
finally had to tell him, "That's not how things are done,
A nicer bunch of democratically-oriented gentlemen and women
could hardly be found.
In their 2008 report to the Pentagon, the RAND researchers
noted the following in relation to Egypt's Kefaya:
"The United States has professed an interest in greater democratization
in the Arab world, particularly since the September 2001 attacks
by terrorists from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt,
and Lebanon. This interest has been part of an effort to reduce
destabilizing political violence and terrorism. As President
George W. Bush noted in a 2003 address to the National Endowment
for Democracy, 'As long as the Middle East remains a place where
freedom does not flourish, it will remain a place of stagnation,
resentment, and violence ready for export' (The White House,
2003). The United States has used varying means to pursue democratization,
including a military intervention that, though launched for
other reasons, had the installation of a democratic government
as one of its end goals.
"However, indigenous reform movements are best positioned to
advance democratization in their own country." 
must carefully understand what Rand means by democracy:
it is essentially the kind of democracy that we detailed
in our article, "The Third World as a Model for the New
the past several decades, a New World Order has been
emerging. It is a globe-girdling "political-corporate-terrorist"
state. The model calls for most of the nations of the
world to be divided into two parts - an elite class
of political / economic "managers," which
in most countries approximates about 20 percent of the
population, and a 'worker-serf' class, which makes up
the remaining 80 percent of the population.
"The 'managers' rule the country at the behest and
in the interest of American corporate power, which itself
is sustained by the machinations and intrigues of the
CIA, which in turn is backed up by the guns of the American
military. It is an Orwellian realm of 'Newspeak' in
which there is very little connection between perception
and reality; where 'freedom' means 'slavery' and 'democracy'
means rule of the many by the few in the interest of
RAND researchers have spent years perfecting techniques of
unconventional regime change under the name "swarming," the
method of deploying mass mobs of digitally-linked youth in hit-and-run
protest formations moving like swarms of bees.  [Please
see our article, "The Truth
about What Is Happening in the Ukraine: Managing Democracy"
for information on the so-called "Color Revolutions;" please
also see our articles on the machinations of Chevron Oil in
the intrigues that encompass the oil fields of the Trans-Caucasus
region and the Caspian Sea, "The
Caucasus Mountains, Gog, Magog, and Chevron Oil; also
please see our article, "The
Elite's Explanation of What's Happening in Chechnya."]
Washington and the stable of "human rights" and "democracy"
and "non-violence" NGOs it oversees, over the past decade or
more has increasingly relied on sophisticated "spontaneous"
nurturing of local indigenous protest movements to create pro-Washington
regime change and to advance the Pentagon agenda of global Full
the kind of deception that the US government is engaged
in, K. Gajendra Singh, a former high-ranking Indian diplomat,
"Every time I read an op-ed in the New York
Times that was written by a 'senior scholar' from
the Hoover Institute or a 'fellow' from the Cato Institute,
I want to scream, please replace that with 'paid whore
funded by psychotic right-wing billionaires' ... There
is no democracy. There is only IBM and ITT and AT&T,
and DuPont, Dow, Union Carbide and Exxon."
As the RAND study of Kefaya states in its concluding recommendations
to the Pentagon:
"The US government already supports reform efforts through
organizations such as the US Agency for International Development
and the United Nations Development Programme. Given the current
negative popular standing of the United States in the region,
US support for reform initiatives is best carried out through
nongovernmental and nonprofit institutions." 
The RAND 2008 study was even more concrete about future US
Government support for Egyptian and other "reform" movements:
"The US government should encourage nongovernmental organizations
to offer training to reformers, including guidance on coalition
building and how to deal with internal differences in pursuit
of democratic reform. Academic institutions (or even nongovernmental
organizations associated with US political parties, such as
the International Republican Institute or the National
Democratic Institute for International Affairs) could carry
out such training, which would equip reform leaders to reconcile
their differences peacefully and democratically. [We URGE
you to read our recent article, "Libya:
Lies, Lies and More Lies" for information on the International
Republican Institute — which is nothing more than another
CIA FRONT organization.]
"Fourth, the United States should help reformers obtain and
use information technology, perhaps by offering incentives for
US companies to invest in the region's communications infrastructure
and information technology. US information technology companies
could also help ensure that the Web sites of reformers can remain
in operation and could invest in technologies such as anonymizers
that could offer some shelter from government scrutiny. This
could also be accomplished by employing technological safeguards
to prevent regimes from sabotaging the Web sites of reformers."
As their Kefaya monograph states, it was prepared in 2008 by
the "RAND National Security Research Division's Alternative
Strategy Initiative, sponsored by the Rapid Reaction Technology
Office in the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics.
The Alternative Strategy Initiative, just to underscore the
point, includes "research on the creative use of the media and
the radicalization of youth ..." 
In May 2009 just before Obama's Cairo trip to meet Mubarak,
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hosted a number of the
young Egyptian activists in Washington under the auspices of
Freedom House, another "human rights" Washington-based
NGO with a long history of involvement in US-sponsored regime
change from Serbia to Georgia to Ukraine and other Color Revolutions.
[Again, please see our article, "The Truth about What Is
Happening in the Ukraine: Managing Democracy" for information
on the so-called "Color Revolutions;" please also see our articles
on the machinations of Chevron Oil in the intrigues that encompass
the oil fields of the Trans-Caucasus region and the Caspian
Sea, "The Caucasus
Mountains, Gog, Magog, and Chevron Oil; also please
see our article, "The
Elite's Explanation of What's Happening in Chechnya."]
Clinton and Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern
Affairs Jeffrey Feltman met the sixteen activists at the end
of a two-month "fellowship" organized by Freedom House's
"New Generation program." [We URGE you
to read our recent article, "Libya:
Lies, Lies and More Lies" for information on Freedom
House — which — like the Albert Einstein Institute
- is nothing more than another CIA FRONT organization.]
Freedom House and Washington's government-funded regime
change NGO, National Endowment for Democracy (NED) are at the
heart of the uprisings now sweeping across the Islamic world
[and they financially undergird the work of Kefaya]. They
fit the geographic context of what George W. Bush proclaimed
after 2001 as his Greater Middle East Project to bring "democracy"
and "liberal free market" [as understood by Rand — see
NOTE above] economic
reform to the Islamic countries from Afghanistan to Morocco.
When Washington talks about introducing "liberal free market
reform" people should watch out. It is little more than code
for bringing those economies under the yoke of the dollar system
and all that implies.
Blum, a well-known writer, historian and journalist, writes:
many Americans could identify the National Endowment
for Democracy, an organization which often does exactly
the opposite of what its name implies. The NED was set
up in the early 1980s under President Reagan in the
wake of all the negative revelations about the CIA in
the second half of the 1970s. The latter was a remarkable
period. Spurred by Watergate-the Church Committee of
the Senate, the Pike Committee of the House and the
Rockefeller Commission, created by the president, were
all busy investigating the CIA. Seemingly every other
day there was a new headline about the discovery of
some awful thing, even criminal conduct, the CIA had
been mixed up in for years. The Agency was getting an
exceedingly bad name, and it was causing the powers-that-be
"Something had to be done. What was done was not
to stop doing these awful things. Of course not. What
was done was to shift many of these awful things to
a new organization, with a nice sounding name-the National
Endowment for Democracy ...
"The NED, like the CIA, calls what it does supporting
democracy. The governments and movements whom the NED
targets call it destabilization." [Please see our
article, "We Are
All Being Played for Suckers" for more information
Washington's NED in a larger agenda
If we make a list of the countries
in the region which are undergoing mass-based protest movements
since the Tunisian and Egyptian events and overlay them onto
a map, we find an almost perfect convergence between the protest
countries today and the original map of the Washington Greater
Middle East Project that was first unveiled during
the George W. Bush Presidency after 2001.
Washington's NED has been quietly engaged in preparing a wave
of regime destabilizations across North Africa and the Middle
East since the 2001-2003 US military invasions of Afghanistan
and Iraq. The list of where the NED is active is revealing.
Its website lists Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Libya, Syria,
Yemen and Sudan as well, interestingly, as ISRAEL.
Coincidentally these countries are almost all today subject
to "spontaneous" popular regime-change uprisings.
One would do will to note that ISRAEL
is on the list of those nations that need to be "re-organized"
— WHICH IS PRECISELY WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS THE ANTICHRIST
WILL DO TO ISRAEL SHORTLY AFTER THE GOG / MAGOG WAR —
"... when the OVERFLOWING SCOURGE [i.e., the U.S.]
shall pass through, THEN YE [speaking here of Israel]
SHALL BE TRODDEN DOWN BY IT." (Is. 28:18) [We
urge you to see our article, "A
Warning to Those Who Misrepresent God's Word."]
AMERICA: as an "OVERFLOWING SCOURGE."
The International Republican Institute and the National Democratic
Institute for International Affairs mentioned by the RAND document
study of Kefaya are subsidiary organizations of the Washington-based
and US Congress-financed National Endowment for Democracy.
means, essentially, that they are FRONT organizations
for the CIA.
The NED is the coordinating Washington
agency for regime destabilization and change. It is active from
Tibet to Ukraine, from Venezuela to Tunisia, from Kuwait to
Morocco in reshaping the world after the collapse
of the Soviet Union into what George H.W. Bush in a 1991 speech
to Congress proclaimed triumphantly as the dawn of a New World
As the architect and first head of the NED, Allen Weinstein
told the Washington Post in 1991 that, "a lot of what
we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA."
The NED Board of Directors includes or has included former
Defense Secretary and CIA Deputy head, Frank Carlucci of
the Carlyle Group; retired General Wesley Clark of
NATO; neo-conservative warhawk Zalmay Khalilzad who was
architect of George W. Bush's Afghan invasion and later ambassador
to Afghanistan as well as to occupied Iraq. Another NED board
member, Vin Weber, co-chaired
a major independent task force on US Policy toward Reform in
the Arab World with former US Secretary of State Madeleine
Albright, and was a founding member of the ultra-hawkish
Project for a New American Century think-tank with Dick Cheney
and Don Rumsfeld, which advocated forced regime change
in Iraq as early as 1998.  [We urge you to see our
article on the Carlyle Group, "The
Fourth Horseman of the Apocalypse."]
should take note of the presence of former Congressman Vin
Weber on the NED Board of Directors. Weber
is a member of the Council for National Policy which clearly
reveals the presence of so-called Christians (i.e., members
of the Religious Right) in the CIA's machinations.
[Please see our articles, "The
American Empire: the Corporate / Pentagon / CIA / Missionary
Archipelago" and "Apostasy:
Christianity in the Service of a Religio-Political-Corporate
CNP members are found
in Christian organizations encompassing James Dobson's
Focus on the Family, Bill Bright's Campus Crusade for
Christ and it's many branches, Robert Weiner's Maranatha
shepherding group, Gideons, Youth for Christ, World Vision,
Wycliffe Bible Translators, Billy Graham Evangelical Assoc.,
Intercessors for America, International Charismatic Bible
Ministries, National Evangelical Assoc., National Religious
Broadcasters Assoc., Promise Keepers and many more. The
goal of the CNP is to propagate the idea of transforming
the United States back to it's 'godly' heritage, to which
there is no supporting Scripture. [Please see our
article on the CNP, "The
Council on National Policy."]
The NED is supposedly a private, non-government, non-profit
foundation, but it receives a yearly appropriation for its international
work from the US Congress. The National Endowment for Democracy
is dependent on the US taxpayer for funding, but because NED
is not a government agency, it is not subject to normal Congressional
NED money is channeled into target countries through four
"core foundations"—the National Democratic
Institute for International Affairs, linked to the Democratic
Party; the International Republican Institute
tied to the Republican Party; the American
Center for International Labor Solidarity linked to the AFL-CIO
US labor federation as well as the US State Department; and
the Center for International Private Enterprise
linked to the free-market US Chamber of Commerce. [Please
see our article, "The AFL-CIO and
The late political analyst Barbara Conry noted that,
"NED has taken advantage of its alleged private status to
influence foreign elections, an activity that is beyond the
scope of AID or USIA and would otherwise be possible only
through a CIA covert operation. Such activities, it may also
be worth noting, would be illegal for foreign groups operating
in the United States." 
Significantly the NED details its various projects today in
Islamic countries, including in addition to Egypt, in Tunisia,
Yemen, Jordan, Algeria, Morocco, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Syria,
Iran and Afghanistan. In short, most
every country which is presently feeling the earthquake effects
of the reform protests sweeping across the Middle East and North
Africa is a target of NED. 
In 2005 US President George W. Bush made a speech to the NED.
In a long, rambling discourse which equated "Islamic radicalism"
with the evils of communism as the new enemy, and using
a deliberately softer term "broader Middle East" for the term
Greater Middle East that had aroused much distrust in the Islamic
world, Bush stated,
"The fifth element of our strategy in the war on terror is
to deny the militants future recruits by replacing hatred
and resentment with democracy and hope across the broader
Middle East. This is a difficult and long-term project, yet
there's no alternative to it. Our future and the future of
that region are linked. If the broader Middle East is left
to grow in bitterness, if countries remain in misery, while
radicals stir the resentments of millions, then that part
of the world will be a source of endless conflict and mounting
danger, and for our generation and the next. If the peoples
of that region are permitted to choose their own destiny,
and advance by their own energy and by their participation
as free men and women, then the extremists will be marginalized,
and the flow of violent radicalism to the rest of the world
will slow, and eventually end...We're encouraging our friends
in the Middle East, including Egypt and Saudi Arabia, to take
the path of reform, to strengthen their own societies in the
fight against terror by respecting the rights and choices
of their own people. We're standing with dissidents and exiles
against oppressive regimes, because we know that the dissidents
of today will be the democratic leaders of tomorrow..." 
The US Project for a 'Greater Middle East'
The spreading regime change operations of Washington from
Tunisia to Sudan, from Yemen to Egypt to Syria are best viewed
in the context of a long-standing Pentagon and State Department
strategy for the entire Islamic world from Kabul in Afghanistan
to Rabat in Morocco.
The rough outlines of the Washington strategy, based in part
on their successful regime change operations in the former Warsaw
Pact communist bloc of Eastern Europe, were drawn up by former
Pentagon consultant and neo-conservative, Richard Perle and
later Bush official Douglas Feith ...
That policy recommendation was titled A Clean Break: A New
Strategy for Securing the Realm. It was the first Washington
think-tank paper to openly call for removing Saddam Hussein
in Iraq, for an aggressive military stance toward the Palestinians,
striking Syria and Syrian targets in Lebanon. 
Richard Perle (left)
and Douglas Feith (right). [We urge
you to see our article, "The
Break" was a strategy developed by the United States in
conjunction with Benjamin Netanyahu
of Israel which envisioned igniting "COLOR REVOLUTIONS"
throughout the Middle East. Netanyahu later backed away
from the strategy when he discovered that the Americans
had included Israel as a target nation for "CLEAN BREAK."
Again, all this gives evidence to the warning in Scripture
directed at Israel against partnering with the United States:
left hanging by the
Americans in "CLEAN BREAK."
"... your [meaning Israel] covenant with death
[meaning the U.S.] shall be disannulled, and your agreement
with hell [again, the U.S.] shall not stand [i.e., you
will be wickedly BETRAYED]; when the OVERFLOWING SCOURGE
[i.e., the U.S.] shall pass through, THEN YE SHALL BE
TRODDEN DOWN BY IT." (Is. 28:18) [Please see
Chapter XV of the New Antipas Papers,
Gog / Magog War."]
By the time of the events of September 11, 2001 and the return
to Washington of the arch-warhawk neoconservatives around Perle
and others, the Bush Administration put highest priority on
an expanded version of the Perle-Feith paper, calling it their
Greater Middle East Project. Feith was named Bush's Under Secretary
Behind the facade of proclaiming democratic reforms of autocratic
regimes in the entire region, the Greater Middle East was and
is a blueprint to extend US military control
and to break open the statist economies in the entire span of
states from Morocco to the borders of China and Russia.
In May 2009, before the rubble from the US bombing of Baghdad
had cleared, George W. Bush, a President not remembered as a
great friend of democracy, proclaimed a policy of "spreading
democracy" to the entire region and explicitly noted that that
meant "the establishment of a US-Middle East free trade area
within a decade." 
Prior to the June 2004 G8 Summit on Sea Island, Georgia, Washington
issued a working paper, "G8-Greater Middle East Partnership."
Under the section titled Economic Opportunities was
Washington's dramatic call for "an economic transformation similar
in magnitude to that undertaken by the formerly communist countries
of Central and Eastern Europe."
this means practically is the privatization of North Africa's
and the Middle East's oil fields for the benefit of America's
giant oil companies. Indeed, as we noted in our recent
article, "Libya: Lies, Lies and
More Lies," it was EXACTLY the belief that Gaddafi
was planning to nationalize all foreign oil companies
operating in Libya (specifically, Anglo-Dutch Shell, British
Petroleum, U.S. ExxonMobil, Hess Corp., Marathon Oil,
Occidental Petroleum and ConocoPhillips, the Spanish Repsol,
Germany's Wintershall, Austria's OMV, Norway's Statoil,
Eni and Canada's Petro Canada) that led to the present
war in Libya.
cartoon depicting what the privatization of the
Middle East's oil fields would mean to the Arab
The US paper said that the key to this would be the strengthening
of the private sector as the way to prosperity and democracy.
It misleadingly claimed it would be done via the miracle of
microfinance where as the paper put it, "a mere $100 million
a year for five years will lift 1.2 million entrepreneurs (750,000
of them women) out of poverty, through $400 loans to each."
US plan envisioned takeover of regional banking and financial
affairs by new institutions ostensibly international but, like
World Bank and IMF, de facto controlled by Washington,
including WTO. The goal of Washington's long-term project
is to completely control the oil, to completely control the
oil revenue flows, to completely control the entire economies
of the region, from Morocco to the borders of China and all
in between. It is a project as bold as it is desperate.
Once the G8 US paper was leaked in 2004 in the Arabic Al-Hayat,
opposition to it spread widely across the region, with a major
protest to the US definition of the Greater Middle East. As
an article in the French Le Monde Diplomatique in April
2004 noted, "besides the Arab countries, it covers Afghanistan,
Iran, Pakistan, Turkey and Israel,
whose only common denominator is that they lie in the zone where
hostility to the US is strongest, in which Islamic fundamentalism
in its anti-Western form is most rife." It
should be noted that the NED is also active inside Israel with
a number of programs.
Notably, in 2004 it was vehement opposition
from two Middle East leaders—Hosni Mubarak of Egypt and the
King of Saudi Arabia—that forced the ideological zealots of
the Bush Administration to temporarily put the Project for the
Greater Middle East on a back burner.
Will it work?
At this writing it is unclear what the ultimate upshot of the
latest US-led destabilizations across the Islamic world will
bring. It is not clear what will result for Washington and the
advocates of a US-dominated New World Order. Their
agenda is clearly one of creating a Greater Middle East under
firm US grip as a major control of the capital flows and energy
flows of a future China, Russia and a European Union that might
one day entertain thoughts of drifting away from that American
It has huge potential implications for the future of Israel
as well. As one US commentator put it, "The Israeli calculation
today is that if 'Mubarak goes' (which is usually stated as
'If America lets Mubarak go'), Egypt goes. If Tunisia goes (same
elaboration), Morocco and Algeria go. Turkey has already gone.
Gaza has gone to Hamas, and the Palestine Authority might soon
be gone too (to Hamas?). That leaves
Israel amid the ruins of a policy of military domination of
The Washington strategy of "creative destruction" is clearly
causing sleepless nights not only in the Islamic world but also
reportedly in Tel Aviv, and ultimately by now also in Beijing
and Moscow and across Central Asia.
F. William Engdahl is author
of Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in
the New World Order. His book, A Century of War: Anglo-American
Oil Politics and the New World Order has just been reissued
in a new edition.
God bless you all!
FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO WANT TO
FELLOWSHIP ON HOW TO GO ON IN THESE DANGEROUS AND TROUBLED TIMES,
WE URGE YOU TO CONTACT US AT: [email protected].
IN ADDITION, WE URGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD THE NEW ANTIPAS PAPERS,
PRINT THEM OUT YOURSELF, AND STUDY THEM CAREFULLY; SHARE THEM
WITH YOUR FRIENDS.
FINALLY, WE URGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD AND PRINT OUT THE FLYER
WE SENT TO YOU RECENTLY.
Then make copies and take these copies out to the campuses
where you live; pass them out; OR if that seems
too "daring" for you right now, post them on telephone
poles, the sides of buildings, on campus bulletin boards; post
them in union halls, in the neighborhoods of the poor and downtrodden,
near employment offices, wherever you can.
Once again, we URGE you to read (or re-read):
DEBKA, Mubarak believes a US-backed Egyptian military faction
plotted his ouster, February 4, 2011, accessed in www.debka.com/weekly/480/.
DEBKA is open about its good ties to Israeli intelligence
and security agencies. While its writings must be read with
that in mind, certain reports they publish often contain
interesting leads for further investigation.
The Center for Grassroots Oversight, 1954-1970: CIA and
the Muslim Brotherhood ally to oppose Egyptian President
According to the late Miles Copeland, a CIA official stationed
in Egypt during the Nasser era, the CIA allied with the
Muslim Brotherhood which was opposed to Nasser's secular
regime as well as his nationalist opposition to brotherhood
Jijo Jacob, What is Egypt's April 6 Movement?, February
1, 2011, accessed in
Janine Zacharia, Opposition groups rally around Mohamed
ElBaradei, Washington Post, January 31, 2011, accessed in
National Endowment for Democracy, Middle East and North
Africa Program Highlights 2009, accessed in
Amitabh Pal, Gene Sharp: The Progressive Interview, The
Progressive, March 1, 2007.
Emmanuel Sivan, Why Radical Muslims Aren't Taking over
Governments, Middle East Quarterly, December 1997,
Carnegie Endowment, The Egyptian Movement for Change (Kifaya),
Nadia Oweidat, et al, The Kefaya Movement: A
Case Study of a Grassroots Reform Initiative, Prepared
for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Santa Monica,
Ca., RAND_778.pdf, 2008, p. iv.
For a more detailed discussion of the RAND "swarming" techniques
see F. William Engdahl, Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian
Democracy in the New World Order, edition.engdahl, 2009,
Nadia Oweidat et al, op. cit., p. 48.
Ibid., p. 50.
Ibid., p. iii.
Michel Chossudovsky, The Protest Movement in Egypt:
"Dictators" do not Dictate, They Obey Orders, January
29, 2011, accessed in
George Herbert Walker Bush, State of the Union Address
to Congress, 29 January 1991. In the speech Bush at one
point declared in a triumphant air of celebration of the
collapse of the Soviet Union, "What is at stake is more
than one small country, it is a big idea—a new world order..."
Allen Weinstein, quoted in David Ignatius, Openness is
the Secret to Democracy, Washington Post National Weekly
Edition, 30 September 1991, pp. 24-25.
National Endowment for Democracy, Board of Directors, accessed
Barbara Conry, Loose Cannon: The National Endowment for
Democracy, Cato Foreign Policy Briefing No. 27, November
8, 1993, accessed in
National Endowment for Democracy, 2009 Annual Report, Middle
East and North Africa, accessed in
George W. Bush, Speech at the National Endowment for Democracy,
Washington, DC, October 6, 2005, accessed in
Richard Perle, Douglas Feith et al, A Clean Break:
A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, 1996, Washington
and Tel Aviv, The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political
Studies, accessed in
George W. Bush, Remarks by the President in Commencement
Address at the University of South Carolina, White House,
9 May 2003.
Gilbert Achcar, Fantasy of a Region that Doesn't Exist:
Greater Middle East, the US plan, Le Monde Diplomatique,
April 4, 2004, accessed in
William Pfaff, American-Israel Policy Tested by Arab
Uprisings, accessed in
* First published at http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/,
5 February 2011.
We need your help to spread the word concerning Antipas Ministries and the
eschatological viewpoint it represents; WE NEED YOUR
HELP BECAUSE WE DO NOT "LINK" WITH OTHER SO-CALLED "CHRISTIAN"
WEBSITES which are, for the most part, "in the tank"
insofar as their loyalty to the United States is concerned
- a loyalty that has made them partners in the BLOODY
trail the American military has left in its TERROR-RIDDEN
rampage throughout the world, as well as making them partners
in the abject poverty that American corporations have
imposed on the peoples and nations the American military
machine has ravaged - A BLOODY, TERROR-RIDDEN RAMPAGE
THAT HAS TO A LARGE DEGREE BEEN CARRIED OUT IN THE NAME
OF THE "PRINCE OF PEACE." [Please see our articles,
"The Third World
as a Model for the New World Order," Inside
the American New World Order System" and "The
American Empire: The Corporate / Pentagon / CIA / Missionary
YOU CAN HELP BY EMAILING
THIS ARTICLE TO
YOUR FRIENDS AND