The winner take all economy
By: Eric Ruder
"A measure of wheat for a penny [literally - denarius,
a Greek coin which represented a WHOLE DAY'S
wages], and three measures of barley for a penny; and
see thou hurt not the oil and the wine." (Revelation
6:6) [See NOTE
at end of article.]
A great SEPARATION is coming; the Bible very specifically
speaks about it - but it's not the kind of separation
for which most American Christians are looking: It's a
separation that will occur between the rich and the poor
of the earth (Revelation 6:5-6) - a separation that bodes
ill for most Christians living in the United States; specifically,
those Christians who equate "godly living" with
material wealth. In other words, the belief by some that
if you have money, that's an indication of God's favor,
and if you don't, that's an indication of His disfavor;
ipso facto, feel good about that stash of cash
you have in the bank, that big house you live in, the
luxury car you drive, etc.
But the New Testament speaks of no such quid-pro-quo;
indeed, by that measure of godliness, Jesus would have
to be judged a failure, for He said of Himself:
"Foxes have holes, and the birds of the air
have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay
his head." (Matthew 8:20)
Jesus was a very poor man; He
possessed no earthly wealth Himself - and He cautioned
His followers concerning the accumulation of riches:
"Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth,
where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves
break through and steal:
"But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven,
where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where
thieves do not break through nor steal:
"For WHERE YOUR TREASURE IS, THERE WILL BE
YOUR HEART ALSO." (Matthew 6:19-20)
"WHERE YOUR TREASURE IS, THERE WILL BE YOUR HEART
ALSO!" In other words, if your treasure consists
of material wealth, then your heart will be tied to the
earth; and if you treasure consists of spiritual wealth,
then your heart is tied to heaven and the coming kingdom
of Jesus Christ. There are no "ifs," "ands,"
or "buts" about this. The Apostle Paul says:
"For I have told you often before, and I say
it again now with tears in my eyes, there are many who
walk along the Christian road who have become the ENEMIES
of the cross of Christ. Their future is ... LOSS ...
[for] all they think about is this life here on earth."
[Phil. 3:18-19 (Amp.)]
"ALL THEY THINK ABOUT IS
THIS LIFE ON EARTH!" - and that's precisely
what it takes to accumulate wealth in this life. The fact
is, the amassing of wealth does not come easily, nor does
it come accidentally; it requires a great deal of time
and effort to get; and more than
that, once it's acquired, it requires a great deal of
effort to keep.
"ALL THEY THINK ABOUT IS THIS LIFE
The "servicing" of one's treasure - the
time spent on it - indicates where one's heart is. That's
the truth of the matter. And if your time is spent "prettying"
up your house, getting a good education, pursuing a career,
getting that promotion, etc., then "YOUR FUTURE IS
LOSS!" - AND YOU WILL BE SEPARATED
FROM THE KINGDOM OF GOD.
This process is occurring to YOU and countless numbers
like you right now in many different ways - and if you
are swept up by it YOU WILL NOT BE FORGIVEN BY GOD IF
YOU FALL VICTIM TO IT - whether you call yourself a Christian
the persecution of minorities has haunted the "world's greatest democracy."
But today, while many forms of discrimination have been put behind us in
the U.S., fear and anxiety stalks one of America's last despised minorities--the
top 1 percent.
The conditions of their torment are poorly understood by the
rest of us, especially the 60 percent of workers who report that they scrape
by paycheck to paycheck. As a consequence, the 1 percenters endure their suffering in private, further
increasing their sense of social isolation and feelings of self-pity.
But thanks to the work of researchers at Boston College's
Center on Wealth and Philanthropy, we have been afforded a peek into the psyche
of this fragile group--Americans with fortunes worth at least $25 million.
"Sometimes I think that the only people in this country
who worry more about money than the poor are the very wealthy," explains
Robert Kenny, a psychologist who helped devise the survey. "They worry
about losing it, they worry about how it's invested, they worry about the effect it's going to have. And as the
zeroes increase, the dilemmas get bigger."
Those dilemmas are often painful--can we really afford that
$3 million yacht? How is the housing crisis affecting the property value of
our vacation home in Aspen, Colo.? And how does that compare to the mansion
in Palm Springs or the villa in St. Tropez?
In fact, the survey reveals that almost all the respondents
are preoccupied with the inadequacy of their vast fortunes. "Most of
them still do not consider themselves financially secure," writes the
Atlantic's Graeme Wood in "Secret Fears of the Super-Rich."
"For that, they say, they would require on average one-quarter more wealth
than they currently possess."
WELCOME TO the delusional world of the super-rich--where too
much is never enough, and enough is more wealth than any individual
in the history of the world has ever possessed. [Please see
our article, "The Elite,
Money and the End of Days."]
Roughly 115,000 households in the U.S. contend with the psychological
strain of possessing a $25 million treasure chest. The challenges are obviously
daunting, but few realize that the super-rich can't even enjoy the simple
pleasures that the rest of us occasionally take comfort in. As Wood explains:
"A vast body of psychological evidence shows that the pleasures
of consumption wear off through time and depend heavily on
one's frame of reference. Most of us, for instance, occasionally
spoil ourselves with outbursts of deliberate and perhaps excessive
consumption: a fancy spa treatment, dinner at an expensive
restaurant, a shopping spree. In the case of the very wealthy,
such forms of consumption can become so commonplace as to
lose all psychological benefit: constant luxury is, in a sense,
no luxury at all."
On the other hand, those who can't afford even occasional "excessive
consumption" at a luxury spa or expensive restaurant--such as the people
who work at such spas and restaurants--at least enjoy the psychological benefit
of providing high quality services, even if many patrons are ungrateful due
to "luxury fatigue syndrome."
For trust-fund babies, the hardships are even more excruciating,
"These inheritors sometimes display the stereotypical arrogance
of privilege--the fast cars and wanton lifestyles--but the
more introspective among them contend with worries that they'll
lack the motivation to accomplish anything in life or to escape
the shadows of their parents. This self-doubt is magnified
by the knowledge that they're unlikely to find sympathy from
anyone other than their fellow inheritors."
The absurdity of studying the psychological pain of the most
powerful and pampered people on the planet might be more amusing if the top
1 percent didn't genuinely believe their own personal stories of turmoil--and
if the bulk of the political establishment didn't share the same outlook.
According to the mantra of political leaders in both parties,
lower taxes on the super-rich are good for all of us. The assumption is that
the rich create jobs for the rest of us, they bravely
bear the risks of investing in these fragile economic times, and their oh-so-generous
philanthropy helps the less privileged.
Of course, the truth is that the 1 percenters have
trillions stashed away in offshore tax havens that do nothing
to create jobs, that governments bailouts insulate
the super-rich from the bearing the brunt of the Great Recession,
and that statistics show working people contribute
a larger portion of their incomes to charity.
The idea that the super-rich should pay more taxes infuriates
the wealthy and their apologists. An April 18 editorial in the Wall Street
Journal ridiculed the idea that taxing the rich would make a dent in
the nation's troubled finances, asserting the "fiscal futility of raising
rates on the top 2 percent, or even the top 5 percent or 10 percent, of taxpayers
to close the deficit"--even if the tax rate were 100 percent.
The next day, Columbia University economics professor Jeffrey
Sachs ripped the editorial apart:
"The top 10 percent reported $3,856 billion in [adjusted
gross income], equal to 46 percent of total reported income
in the United States, almost 27 percent of GDP. On that, they
paid $721 billion in personal federal income taxes, or an
average of 18.7 percent of income. If
the remaining 81 percent of income were paid in federal income
taxes, the increment in tax revenues would be more than $3.1
trillion, or roughly 21 percent of GDP. The budget deficit
would obviously be closed many times over.
"The real point is obvious. The money received by the richest
households is vast, and higher taxes on the rich will make
a major contribution to closing the deficit."
Taxing the rich not only makes financial sense, it's also what
the majority of people living in the "world's greatest democracy"
want to do. Nearly three-quarters of Americans support raising taxes on those
with incomes of more than $250,000 a year, according to a Washington Post-ABC
News Poll from mid-April.
So what's the hold up? In the May 2011 issue of Vanity Fair,
Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz provides a simple and compelling
explanation: The top 1 percent themselves:
"Virtually all U.S. senators, and most of the representatives
in the House, are members of the top 1 percent when they arrive,
are kept in office by money from the top 1 percent, and know
that if they serve the top 1 percent well they will be rewarded
by the top 1 percent when they leave office. By and large,
the key executive-branch policymakers on trade and economic
policy also come from the top 1 percent...
"It should not make jaws drop that a tax bill cannot emerge
from Congress unless big tax cuts are put in place for the
wealthy. Given the power of the top 1 percent, this is the
way you would expect the system to work.
Nevertheless, politicians across the political spectrum perpetrate
the myth that the rich pay a disproportionate share of taxes in the U.S.
According to tax expert David Cay Johnston, "It's true
that the top 1 percent of wage earners paid 38 percent of the federal income
taxes in 2008 (the most recent year for which data is available). But people
forget that the income tax is less than half of federal taxes and only one-fifth
of taxes at all levels of government." Once payroll taxes and other
federal taxes are taken into account, the burden shifts disproportionately
to workers and the poor.
30 years, income and wealth for the super-rich have grown astronomically,
while living standards for the bottom 90 percent stagnated or declined. As
"Since 1980, when Reagan won the presidency promising prosperity
through tax cuts, the average income of the vast majority--the
bottom 90 percent of Americans--has increased a meager $303,
or 1 percent. Put another way, for each dollar people in the
vast majority made in 1980, in 2008, their income was up to
"Those at the top did better. The top 1 percent's average
income more than doubled to $1.1 million...The really rich,
the top one-tenth of 1 percent, each enjoyed almost $4 in
2008 for each dollar in 1980. The top 300,000 Americans
now enjoy almost as much income as the bottom 150 million.
Large numbers of Americans have seen their home values and
retirement funds take a nosedive in the last couple years because of the economic
crisis. But members of the Forbes 400 list of the richest Americans
appear to be holding their own. In 2010, their combined net worth rose to
an estimated $1.37 trillion, up 8 percent from 2009.
The number of billionaires and millionaires in the U.S. continues
to grow--and that's feeding a global luxury industry dedicated to catering
to the "needs" of the obscenely wealthy.
For example, whether you're a billionaire in San Francisco,
Istanbul, the United Arab Emirates or Rome, you should be able to find one
of a growing number of $25,000-a-night hotel rooms.
That may sound expensive, but remember what the experts tell
us about the 1 percenters' diminishing capacity to enjoy the pleasures of
consumption. And truthfully, $25,000 a night isn't even that much. A billionaire
could stay in one of those hotel rooms every night for the next 100 years
and still have money in the bank.
Examples of $25,000 a night hotel rooms: LEFT:
suite of rooms at the Dubai Apeiron Island Hotel; RIGHT:
Bridge suite at the Atlantis hotel.
But now, let's imagine what we could do with this wealth to
meet the pressing needs of humanity--here and around the world. We can even
leave 10 percent of it to the Forbes 400, meaning they'll have to figure out
how to get by with only $340 million each:
Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria needs a mere $13 billion to
fully fund existing programs to address the HIV/AIDS crisis in Africa.
the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization estimated that $30 billion would
be needed to give 862 million hungry people around the world enough to eat.
Since eating is important, let's dedicate $60 billion.
We can set
aside another $100 billion for other global epidemics, emergencies and scourges.
The first $14 billion could be used to rebuild Haiti in the wake of last year's
In the U.S.,
we could eliminate the need for painful budget cuts that all state politicians--from
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker to California Gov. Jerry Brown--are demanding
by setting aside $142 billion to plug the combined budget gap for all 50 states.
billion could finance a federal jobs initiative that would create 3 million
jobs in education, health care and other community services. This would both
address the double-digit unemployment crisis as well as provide badly needed
services to kids in need of child care and education and the elderly in need
of in-home health care.
billion would provide health care to the roughly 50 million Americans without
health insurance; $36 billion would rebuild the nation's 33,000 crumbling
schools; $138 billion would provide 1 million affordable housing units; $74
billion would provide four-year scholarships to 3 million college students;
$5 billion would double spending on federal assistance for the poor and elderly
who can't afford to pay for heat.
the remaining $422 billion, we could give a $6,000 bonus to every American
worker making less than the median income--roughly 70 million people.
Now remember that these suggestions would redistribute 90 percent
of the wealth of the richest 400 Americans. The wealth of the top 1 percent
is 10 times greater than this, so multiply all these numbers by 10--or find
dozens more productive ways to spend the money.
If you're tired after trying to find ways to spend that much
money, perhaps you should check in to one of those $25,000-a-night hotel rooms
NOTE: The meaning of
this lyric is that the condition of man during this era
(i.e., the "end of days") will be reduced to
such that he will have to labor a whole day simply to
buy a loaf of bread or three measures of barley. But the
second part of the lyric [i.e., "... and see thou
hurt not the oil and the wine ..."] means that the
"hard times" of this period will not extend
to the elites. This is the common interpretation - the
one subscribed to by Ryrie, Pentacost, Ironside, Gaebelein,
FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO WANT TO
FELLOWSHIP ON HOW TO GO ON IN THESE DANGEROUS AND TROUBLED TIMES,
WE URGE YOU TO CONTACT US AT: [email protected].
IN ADDITION, WE URGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD THE NEW ANTIPAS PAPERS,
PRINT THEM OUT YOURSELF, AND STUDY THEM CAREFULLY; SHARE THEM
WITH YOUR FRIENDS.
FINALLY, WE URGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD AND PRINT OUT THE FLYER
WE SENT TO YOU RECENTLY.
Then make copies and take these copies out to the campuses
where you live; pass them out; OR if that seems
too "daring" for you right now, post them on telephone
poles, the sides of buildings, on campus bulletin boards; post
them in union halls, in the neighborhoods of the poor and downtrodden,
near employment offices, wherever you can.
Once again, we URGE you to read (or re-read):
We need your help to spread the word concerning Antipas Ministries and the
eschatological viewpoint it represents; WE NEED YOUR
HELP BECAUSE WE DO NOT "LINK" WITH OTHER SO-CALLED "CHRISTIAN"
WEBSITES which are, for the most part, "in the tank"
insofar as their loyalty to the United States is concerned
- a loyalty that has made them partners in the BLOODY
trail the American military has left in its TERROR-RIDDEN
rampage throughout the world, as well as making them partners
in the abject poverty that American corporations have
imposed on the peoples and nations the American military
machine has ravaged - A BLOODY, TERROR-RIDDEN RAMPAGE
THAT HAS TO A LARGE DEGREE BEEN CARRIED OUT IN THE NAME
OF THE "PRINCE OF PEACE." [Please see our articles,
"The Third World
as a Model for the New World Order," Inside
the American New World Order System" and "The
American Empire: The Corporate / Pentagon / CIA / Missionary
YOU CAN HELP BY EMAILING
THIS ARTICLE TO
YOUR FRIENDS AND