THE CONFLICT IN THE MIDDLE EAST:
WHAT IT'S REALLY ALL ABOUT
July 21, 2005
by: S.R. Shearer
"Things are not always what they seem to be."
Paul Neuman to Sally Fields
In Absence of Malice
Things are not always
what they seem to be - and no more so than in the Middle East. At first glance,
the present war in the Middle East seems to have been ignited by happenchance:
a soldier was kidnapped by Hamas in Gaza, igniting Israel's firestorm there;
then a few days later two more Israeli soldiers were taken hostage by Herzbollah
on the border with Lebanon. From there, everything just seemed to explode.
But - again - things are not always what they seem to be!
For some time now, both
Israel and the United States have been CRAVING for an excuse to go
to war with both Iran and Syria, and the present war in Lebanon may give them
the "justification" (really, the pretext) to do so. Each country
has its own particular reason for wanting war: in the case of Israel, self-survival
against the unquenchable hatred of the radical Islamists (who are sponsored
by Syria and Iran); in the case of the United States, LUST for the
oil riches of the Middle East.
Dr. Michel Chossudovsky, a professor of economics
at the University of Ottawa and the Director of the Center for Research on
Globalization, writing on America's appetite for war with Syria and Iran,
"The Bush administration has officially identified Iran and Syria as
the next stage of 'the road map to war'. TARGETING IRAN IS A BIPARTISAN
PROJECT, WHICH BROADLY SERVES THE INTERESTS OF THE
AMERICAN OIL CONGLOMERATES,
THE WALL STREET FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENT AND THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX."
And insofar as Israel is concerned, it certainly
isn't any secret that Iran and Syria are now in its crosshairs! Professor
James Petras, Global Research ContributingEditor and a former Professor
of Sociology at Binghamton University, New York, writes:
"Never has an imminent war been so loudly and publicly advertised
as Israel's forthcoming military attack against Iran. When the Israeli
Military Chief of Staff, Daniel Halutz, was asked how far Israel was
ready to go to stop Iran's nuclear energy program, he said 'Two thousand
kilometers' - the distance between Jerusalem and Tehran.
"More specifically Israeli military sources reveal that Israel's
has already ordered Israel's armed forces to prepare
for air strikes on uranium enrichment sites in Iran According to the
London Times the order to prepare for attack went through the
Israeli defense ministry to the Chief of Staff
Now, one must understand
something here: Insofar as the interests of both Israel and the United States
are concerned, THE PREDATORY INTERESTS OF AMERICA TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER
THE INTERESTS OF ISRAEL FOR SURVIVAL. And it's easy to see
why. In the eyes of America's moneyed elites, money trumps everything else,
and that's certainly true insofar as Israel's survival is concerned. In this
world, oil means money, and most of the world's oil is located in the Middle
Indeed, according to Eric Waddell, the author
of The Battle for Oil, the broader Middle East-Central Asian region
encompasses more than 70% of the World's reserves of oil and natural gas.
Iran possesses 10% of the world's oil and ranks third after Saudi Arabia (25
%) and Iraq (11 %) in the size of its reserves. In comparison, the US possesses
less than 2.8 % of global oil reserves.
THE SECOND STAGE IN AMERICA'S ATTACK ON IRAN
It's in the light of America's lust for the oil
of the Middle East (and not so much in the light of Israel's interest in self-survival)
that one should view the developing crisis in the Middle East between Herzbollah
and Hamas (on the one side) and Israel (on the other side): America is using
Israel's war with Hamas and Herzbollah as a "STALKING HORSE"
in transitioning into the second stage of its plan to take control of the
oil assets of the Middle East and Central Asia (the first stage being America's
war on Iraq) - a stage that is ultimately aimed at both Syria and Iran (Herzbollah's
and Hamas' sponsors).
THE PROBLEM: GAINING THE SUPPORT OF
THE ISRAELI AND AMERICAN POPULATIONS
The problem for the
United States is that overwhelming numbers of Americans want nothing to do
with such a war - and this is especially true in the light of Bush's subterfuge
in getting America involved in the war in Iraq. And the same is true insofar
as Israel is concerned: People there want nothing to do with a war with Syria
and Iran; for example, a survey in the Israeli newspaper Yedioth
Ahronoth, reported by Reuters shows that 58 per cent of the Israelis polled
believed the dispute over Iran's nuclear program should be handled diplomatically
while only 36 per cent said its reactors should be destroyed in a military
The problem - especially
for the American oil elites - is how to get the American people (and the Israeli
people) to go along with a war against Syria and Iran. The PR strategy hit
upon by the Bush administration and the American oil elites appears to be
a two-part one:
Demonstrate the implacable hatred of Herzbollah and Hamas
for Israel - which should not be hard to do. In doing so, the Bush administration
will accomplish the following:
It will enlist the support of its
core constituency - the evangelical Christian community - for a war against
Iran and Syria because of their sponsorship of these two radical Islamic groups.
In addition - and over time - it
will enable the administration to paint all Muslims as nothing more than rabid
animals that are good for nothing except to be hunted down and exterminated
- something that growing numbers of Christians in America are beginning to
The administration can use the present fighting in the Middle
East as an excuse to demonstrate the fact that America, and America alone,
is the only guarantor of peace in the Middle East - not the U.N., not the
E.U., not Russia, not anyone else. This will accomplish the following:
It will enable the United States to conclude a defense
pact - with U.N., E.U., and Russian support - with Israel, a defense
pact that will guarantee Israel's security and one that will persuade Israel
to continue "trading land for peace" insofar as the Palestinians
are concerned - a goal fervently desired by the U.N., the E.U. and Russia.
OBLIGATING AMERICA TO THE
DESTRUCTION OF SYRIA AND IRAN
Now, insofar as such
a defense pact is concerned, it isn't so much that the United States thinks
- even for a minute - that such a pact will do much to stop Herzbollah, Hamas,
or any of the other innumerable radical Islamists in the Middle East; that's
not it at all. BUT WHAT IT WILL ULTIMATELY DO IS OBLIGATE THE UNITED
STATES - WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE U.N., THE E.U. AND RUSSIA - TO DEFEND ISRAEL
AGAINST HERZBOLLAH'S AND HAMAS' SPONSORS - SYRIA AND IRAN.
The United States would
then have carte blanche in carrying out a murderous war of extermination
against the people of the Middle East, beginning first with Syria and Iran
- A WAR IN WHICH IT IS OBLIGATED TO TAKE ON, and for which it
will have a mandate from the United Nations to do so.
What comes next is anyone's guess. But be clear
here - the U.S. is pushing the fighting in the Middle East to its limits.
How far it will have to push is difficult to say. If the U.S. can achieve
its goal of justifying a defense pact between itself and Israel in the eyes
of the world with the simple destruction of Lebanon, then the fighting will
If not, the fighting will be pursued into both
Syria and Iran - not necessarily with the aim of destroying these countries
- at least not now - but with the aim of securing the acquiescence of the
U.N., the E.U. and the other nations of the world for a defense pact between
Israel and the United States - A DEFENSE PACT THAT ALL MUST ACQUIESCE IN.
No other guarantor will suffice for Israel - certainly not the UN, the EU
and Russia, all of whom Israel sees as toothless tigers that are biased against
them. Thus, if the UN, the EU and Russia want peace in the Middle East - as
they see it - they will have to acquiesce in this pact.
THE DOCTRINE OF "END TIMES" INSOFAR
AS RADICAL ISLAM IS CONCERNED
Now one might ask, Are the Muslims of the Middle
East blind to what's going on? Can't they see that they are being maneuvered
into a war of extermination with the world's sole super power, a war that
they have about as much chance of winning that a snow ball has in not melting
But it's here - it's precisely here - that the
eschatology or "doctrine of end times" for the radical Islamists
comes into play. The eschatology of the radical Islamists is to a very large
degree a strange amalgamation of Christian and Jewish eschatology: It pictures
a final great battle in the "end of days" between the forces of
Light and the forces of Darkness for mastery of the world. On the one side
will be gathered the forces of Islam (the "Righteous of the Earth")
and on the other side will be gathered the forces of Darkness (all those who
have refused to convert to Islam (especially Christians and Jews).
As this battle progresses, the forces of Light
will be driven to the wall by the forces of the ungodly, and so much so that
it will seem that all is lost. But then suddenly - in the twinkling of an
eye - CHRIST WILL APPEAR WITH THE PROPHET MOHAMMAD AT HIS SIDE - to
rescue the Islamists from certain defeat and to take vengeance on all those
who have been in league with the "GREAT SATAN," meaning the
United States of America.
You're surprised? - well, you shouldn't be if
you had taken the time, as most people would put it, to "know your enemy."
In the light of this eschatology, it should come as no wonder that the forces
of radical Islam will march, virtually unarmed, into the trap that the American
oil elites have set for them, because while you may not have been aware of
the eschatology of the radical Islamists, the oil elites and the CIA are more
than aware of it, and THEY ARE PLANNING TO MAKE USE OF IT TO DESTROY THE
ISLAMIC WORLD IN A NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST THAT WILL DWARF ALL THE WARS THAT
MANKIND HAS EVER BEEN PREVIOUSLY INVOLVED IN: THE GOG / MAGOOG WAR.
Now, again, how far the Americans will have to
push the present conflict in the Middle East to precipitate the conditions
necessary for the U.N., the E.U. and the rest of the world to acquiesce in
supporting a defense pact between Israel and the United States - A DEFENSE
PACT THAT WILL OBLIGATE THE REST OF THE WORLD TO SUPPORT THE UNITED STATES
IN ITS MURDEROUS, VILE SCHEME AGAINST THE MUSLIM WORLD - is, as I have
already stated, anyone's guess. I should imagine, however, that it will take
the expansion of the present conflict beyond its present parameters to do
so - possibly so far as to involve a limited nuclear strike against Iran.
NUCLEAR WAR: IT'S NOT THAT
FAR OFF IN THE DISTANCE NOW
And one should be very clear here, the United
States has been planning for just such a war in the Middle East - one that
will see the use of nuclear warheads - for some time now. Chossudovsky warns
ominously that -
an outright war using nuclear warheads against Iran is now in the
final planning stages."
"The broad national security interests and objectives expressed in the
President's National Security Strategy (NSS) and the Chairman's National Military
Strategy (NMS) form the foundation of the United States Central Command's
theater strategy [insofar as the Middle East is concerned]. The NSS directs
[the military] to protect the United States' vital interest in the region
- [which is] uninterrupted, secure U.S.
access to Gulf oil."
Insofar as the use of "tactical nuclear warheads"
is concerned in pursuit of this policy, America has been laying the groundwork
for their employment in the Middle East for several months now. The use of
these weapons is based on the Bush administration's doctrine of "preemptive"
nuclear war under the 2002Nuclear Posture Review.
NUCLEAR WARHEADS "HAVE BEEN MADE SAFE"
The publicity (really, the propaganda or "newspeak")
that undergirds the use of these warheads is based on the astonishing belief
that such warheads "have been made safe" in recent years, and that
- as a result - these "mini-nukes" (some of which have an explosive
capacity of up to 6 times the Hiroshima bomb) are instruments of peace rather
than war. This is, of course, a bold-faced lie - but it's a lie that has enlisted
the support of "authoritative" nuclear scientists and even the U.S.
Chossudovsky says that Bush administration officials
argue that low-yield nuclear weapons are needed as a credible deterrent against
"rogue states" such as Syria and Iran.Their logic is that
existing nuclear weapons are too destructive to be used except in a full-scale
nuclear war. Hence, potential enemies do not consider the threat of nuclear
retaliation to be credible; but with the development of these so-called "low-yield"
nuclear weapons such an argument by nations such as Syria and Iran is no longer
credible; that would make these "mini-nukes" more effective as a
There are, of course, many who argue otherwise.
For instance, the Japan Economic News has voiced a deep-seated pessimism
about this kind of thinking. The newspaper maintains that this "new definition"
of a nuclear warhead has dangerously blurred the distinction between conventional
and nuclear weapons. The paper goes on to warn:
"The implication of this obviously is that nuclear weapons are being
brought down from a special category of being a last resort, or sort of the
ultimate weapon, to being just another tool in the toolbox."
According to sources that Chossudovsky has developed,
a nuclear attack against either Syria or Iran using tactical nuclear weapons
would be coordinated out of US Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) Headquarters
at the Offutt Air Force base in Nebraska in liaison with US command units
in the Persian Gulf, the Diego Garcia military base and Israel.
PLANNING FOR A NUCLEAR WAR
David Ruppe, elaborating on Chossudovsky, says
that USSTRATCOM has evidently been in "an advance state of readiness"
for over six months - following the conduct of relevant military exercises
against a "fictional" country (assumed by many to be Iran) in November
of 2005. Ruppe goes on to say that USSTRATCOM -
has 'met all the requirements necessary to declare an initial operational
capability as of Nov. 18, 2005. A week before this announcement, the unit
finished a command-post exercise, dubbed Global Lightening
performance during Global Lightning demonstrated its preparedness to
execute its mission of providing integrated space and global strike capabilities
to U.S. forces [in an attack against Iran]."
On December 30th, 2005, the Japanese
Economic Newswire reported that Japanese officials concur with Ruppe's
analysis; commenting on the mission of USSTRATCOM as postulated by Global
Lightening, the newspaper reports:
"[Japanese] nuclear specialists and governmental sources pointed out
that one of its [i.e., USSTRATCOM's] main missions would be to implement the
2001 nuclear strategy that includes an option of preemptive nuclear attacks
on 'rogue states' with WMDs [meaning, of course, Iran]."
CREATING A TRIGGER FOR A NUCLEAR WAR
According to Hans Kristensen of the Nuclear Information
Project, the operational plan for Global Lightening is called Global
Strike and is euphemistically referred to as Concept Plan 8022 (CONPLAN
8022). Kristensen writes that Global Strike is a plan envisioned as
a "TRIGGER FOR A NUCLEAR WAR WITH IRAN."
William Arkin of the Washington Post writes
"CONPLAN 8022 is distinct from othermilitary operations in that it does
not contemplate the deployment of ground troops.[Instead], it posits an
operation with no "boots on the ground." The [usual] typical war
plan encompasses an amalgam of forces -- air, ground, sea -- and takes into
account the logistics and political dimensions needed to sustain those forces
in protracted operations ... [In contrast to this], the Global Strike
plan is an offensive AIR campaign
[that can be] triggered
by a simple presidential order."
USING ISRAEL AS A "STALKING HORSE"
The United States envisions using Israel in Global
Strike both as a FRONT behind which it (i.e., the United States)
can mask its leading role in the war against Iran, and as an ancillary strike
force. To that end, Gordon Thomas reports that the United States has been
supplying Israel with US made conventional and nuclear weapons for several
This provision of nuclear weapons to Israel has
been financed by USmilitary aid, and has now been largely completed.Israel
has taken delivery from the US of several thousand "smart air launched
weapons" including some 500 "bunker-buster bombs;" specifically
the conventional "bunker buster" (the BLU 113), and the B61-11,
which is the "nuclear version" of the BLU 113. In addition, Israeli
Dolphin-class submarines have been equipped with US Harpoon missiles armed
with nuclear warheads that have been targeted at Iran.
IRAN IS NO IMMEDIATE THREAT TO ANYONE
The subterfuge behind which Israel is planning
to join the United States in an attack against Iran is its fear of a nuclear
armed Iran. But Professor Petras says that such fears are grossly inflated
- AND THAT ISRAEL KNOWS THIS; that even -
Israeli Defense Forces Chief of Staff, Daniel Halutz, has
that Iran represents an immediate nuclear threat to Israel, let alone the
United States. According to Haaretz (12/14/05), Halutz stated that
it would take Iran time to be able to produce a nuclear bomb - which he estimated
might happen between 2010 and 2015."
"Israeli intelligence has determined that Iran has neither the enriched
uranium nor the capability to produce an atomic weapon now or in the immediate
future, in contrast to the hysterical claims publicized [in]
"Mohammed El Baradei, head of the United Nations International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA), which has inspected Iran for several years, has pointed
out that the IAEA has found no proof that Iran is trying to construct nuclear
weapons. He criticized Israeli and US war plans indirectly by warning that
a 'military solution would be completely unproductive'."
The fact is, as Petras reports, the Iranians are
at an elementary stage in the processing of uranium, not even reaching the
point of uranium enrichment, which in turn will take still a number of years,
and the need to overcome many complex technical problems, before it can build
a bomb. There is no factual basis for arguing that Iran represents a nuclear
threat to Israel or to the US forces in the Middle East. In addition, Petras
says that scores of countries with nuclear reactors by necessity use enriched
uranium. The Iranian decision to advance to processing enriched uranium is
its sovereign right as it is for all countries which possess nuclear reactors
in Europe, Asia and North America.
The vague formulation by the United States and
Israel of Iran's potential nuclear capacity is so open-ended that it could
apply to scores of countries in both Europe and Asia. Nonetheless, both countries
are determined to press the issue - the United States because it has larger
fish to fry (so to speak), specifically, it needs a pretext to topple the
present Iranian government in order to "get at" Iran's oil wealth,
and Israel because it wants to continue to ingratiate itself to the United
States and prove its worth as America's lap dog in the Middle East.
ISRAEL AS AMERICA'S ROTTWEILLER?
THINGS ARE MORE COMPLICATED THAN THAT
Many believe that "The US wants to set
Israel loose;" or that, in the words of Vice President Dick Cheney,
the United States wants Israel "
to act on America's behalf and 'do
it' (i.e., attack Iran) for us;" that -
"Israel is [nothing more than] America's Rottweiler on a leash."
While this may be true, Chossudovsky contends
that things are much more complicated than that; Chossudovsky writes:
"The foregoing statement [by Cheney] is misleading. The US is not 'encouraging
Israel'. What we are dealing with is a joint US-Israeli military operation
to bomb Iran, which has been in the active planning stage for more than a
year. The Neocons in the Defense Department, under Douglas Feith, have been
working assiduously with their Israeli military and intelligence counterparts,
carefully identifying targets inside Iran
Under this working arrangement,
Israel will not act unilaterally, without a green light from Washington. In
other words, ISRAEL WILL NOT IMPLEMENT AN ATTACK [ON IRAN] WITHOUT THE
PARTICIPATION OF THE U.S."
According to the Arab Monitor, the reasoning
in American circles behind such an attack is that an -
US-Israeli bombing raid of Iran's nuclear facilities will stir up
ethnic tensions AND TRIGGER 'REGIME CHANGE' IN FAVOR OF THE US
advisers believe that the 'Iranian opposition movement' will unseat the Mullahs."
This is an idea that Petras thinks is absolutely
asinine and represents the kind of naοve thinking that went into America's
attack on Iraq. BUT, AGAIN, PETRAS MAY BE MAKING A BIG MISTAKE IN UNDERESTIMATING
THE DUPLICITY AND CUNNING OF THE UNITED STATES HERE: look what the U.S.
has accomplished in its war against Iraq; it has enabled the U.S. -
To place 135,000 COMBAT TROOPS IN THE VERY HEART OF THE MIDDLE EAST.
To build a large number of SUPER-BASES in Iraq which most Americans
are not even aware of, bases which allow the U.S. to stage air raids anywhere
in the Middle East without the necessity of enlisting the "iffy"
support of the Saudi Regime.
This in turn has allowed the U.S. to put the Saudi Regime on its target list
if the Saudis refuse to "cow-tow" to the American war plans.
And all this at the cost of a mere 2800 American
lives - a pittance insofar as the American oil elites are concerned; after
all, what do they care for the sons and daughters of average Americans!
Finally, the war in Iraq has led to the sullen
acquiescence of the Europeans and the United Nations insofar as American military
power is concerned; it has also led to their realization that the Americans
are willing to use this power. While the people "in the street"
in Europe and elsewhere may think that the war in Iraq has demonstrated America's
weakness, the elites in the United Nations and the E.U. know better. They
know that in the end all the United States is doing in Iraq is playing with
the people of Iraq like a cat plays with a mouse just before it kills it -
AND THEY DON'T WANT THAT TO HAPPEN TO THEM. They know that in this
world POWER FLOWS OUT OF THE BARREL OF A GUN, AND THE U.S. HAS ALL THE
GUNS - OR AT LEAST ALL THE GUNS THAT COUNT.
SETTING IRAN UP FOR AN ATTACK
As a result, they have bowed to American power,
and the proof of this fact lies in the way the so-called European Quartet
(France, Germany, Russia and Britain) has played along with the Americans
insofar as the subterfuge against Iran is concerned. Petras writes:
"The European Quartet has raised a bogus issue by evading the issue
of whether or not Iran has atomic weapons or is manufacturing them, and focused
instead on attacking Iran's capacity to produce nuclear energy - namely the
production of enriched uranium. The Quartet has conflated enriched uranium
with a nuclear threat and nuclear potential with the danger of an imminent
nuclear attack on Western countries, troops and Israel. The Europeans, especially
Great Britain, have two options in mind: To impose an Iranian acceptance of
limits on its sovereignty, more specifically on its energy policy; or to force
Iran to reject the arbitrary addendum to the Non-Proliferation Agreement AND
THEN TO PROPAGANDIZE THIS REJECTION AS AN INDICATION OF IRAN'S EVIL INTENTION
TO CREATE ATOMIC BOMBS AND TARGET PRO-WESTERN COUNTRIES.
"The Western media would echo the US and European governments' position
that Iran was responsible for the breakdown of negotiations
[and] that since
'reason' had failed, the only recourse [was]
to take the issue to the Security
Council and approve international sanctions against Iran.
"The US then would attempt to pressure Russia and China to vote in favor
of sanctions or to abstain. There is reason to doubt that either or both countries
would agree, given the importance of the multi-billion dollar oil, arms, nuclear
and trade deals between Iran and these two countries. HAVING TRIED AND
FAILED IN THE SECURITY COUNCIL, THE U.S. AND ISRAEL WOULD
MOVE TOWARD A
MILITARY ATTACK ..."
UNLEASHING THE FORCES OF HELL
Arab Monitor warns, however, that such an attack would unleash
the forces of hell:
"The mullah's of Iran will not be unseated by such an attack. WHAT
IS MORE LIKELY TO OCCUR IS THAT IRANIANS WILL RALLY BEHIND A WARTIME GOVERNMENT
AGAINST FOREIGN AGGRESSION. IN FACT, THE ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST AND BEYOND WOULD
LIKELY RISE UP AGAINST US INTERVENTIONISM."
In order to stop the
aggression, the UN and the EU will bend over backwards to kiss America's ass
(so to speak), and in doing so, they will acquiesce to America's plan for
peace in the Middle East; specifically, a defense pact between Israel and
the United States that is supported by the UN and the EU - one that
they (i.e., the Europeans, the UN, etc.) believe will "force" Israel
to continue to trade land for peace - a peace that they hope will bring tranquility
to the Middle East.
But that kind of thinking
is folly. The furies that would be unleashed by a nuclear strike against Syria
and Iran by the United States and Israel will lead inexorably to further war
- a war, specifically, the Gog / Magog War - that will open up the "Tribulation
Period," a tornado of demonic frenzy that the Bible says will lead to
the destruction of five-sixths of the population of the Middle East (Ezek.
There is, of course,
the possibility that the present conflict will stop short of an attack against
Syria and Iran; that the "troubles" in Lebanon will be enough for
the UN and the EU to acquiesce in the defense pact between Israel and the
United States - A DEFENSE PACT, AGAIN, THAT HAS CLEVERLY BEEN DESIGNED
TO ENLIST THE SUPPORT OF THE WORLD FOR THE COMING HOLOCAUST OF THE ISLAMIC
PEOPLES OF THE MIDDLE EAST. That's possible. But the more likely scenario
is that it will take a broadening of the present conflict to bring about such
a result. Either way, God help us all! - especially, in this case, Israel
because Israel has made a pact with the devil!
Brothers and sisters,
listen to me now! It's time for you to begin taking the Prophetic Scriptures
to heart. If you fail to do so, and if you fail to act upon them, you will
surely pay a terrible price.
God bless you all!
WE URGE ALL OF YOU TO TAKE THE TIME TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION
IN THIS ARTICLE BY READING (1) "Fearful
Sights and Great Signs from Heaven" for a detailed description
of the Gog/Magog War and Israel's defense pact with the United States
(Israel's "Treaty with Death and Hell"), (2) "Here
Comes the Judge," and (3) "A Dreadful
Nation; an 'Overflowing Scourge': the Rise of American Nuclear Superiority."
We also URGE you to sign up for our "training" which will enable
you to become conversant with the Prophetic Scriptures yourself. To get
details on signing up, just send an email to email@example.com
We need your help to spread the word concerning Antipas Ministries and the
eschatological viewpoint it represents; WE NEED YOUR
HELP BECAUSE WE DO NOT "LINK" WITH OTHER SO-CALLED "CHRISTIAN"
WEBSITES which are, for the most part, "in the tank"
insofar as their loyalty to the United States is concerned
- a loyalty that has made them partners in the BLOODY
trail the American military has left in its TERROR-RIDDEN
rampage throughout the world, as well as making them partners
in the abject poverty that American corporations have
imposed on the peoples and nations the American military
machine has ravaged - A BLOODY, TERROR-RIDDEN RAMPAGE
THAT HAS TO A LARGE DEGREE BEEN CARRIED OUT IN THE NAME
OF THE "PRINCE OF PEACE." [Please see our articles,
"The Third World
as a Model for the New World Order," Inside
the American New World Order System" and "The
American Empire: The Corporate / Pentagon / CIA / Missionary
YOU CAN HELP BY EMAILING
THIS ARTICLE TO
YOUR FRIENDS AND