Our Descent Into Darkness
Slouching Towards Nuremberg?
by MORRIS BERMAN
 |
| THE NUREMBERG LAWS: Strange things are happening in the United States these days, and every day seems to bring additional scary news. The similarity to the erosion of civil liberties in Germany during the 1930s is a bit too close for comfort. |
PREFACEAs I look around today - even among those who are biblically oriented and seem to genuinely grasp what's happening insofar as the unfolding events of the "end of the age" are concerned - I am UTTERLY appalled at how ill-prepared people are both psychologically and spiritually for what is shortly to come to pass. There seems to be no way to get through to people; to convince them that NOW is the time for action, not tomorrow, nor the next day, nor the day after that. Most Christians today seem to be helpless prisoners of the "here and now," and though from time to time they may be excited by a particular calamity that augurs for the "end of the age," once the commotion of the event dies down, they tend to gravitate back to their old habits of doing things and their old ways of thinking. Yes, they understand how hopelessly apostate today's Christianity is; how inextricably bound the church is to the American New World Order System; and yes, they're planning to take action someday - but not today; maybe tomorrow. There are more pressing "responsibilities" to be taken care of: there are payments to be made on visa and mastercards, mortgages to be met, businesses to run; there are "responsibilities" to children and aged parents - and on and on and on; and in taking care of all these things they forget the admonition of the Scriptures concerning "Last Things:" that we who "know His will" concerning the "end of the age" are to "prepare ourselves for it" just as Noah did with regard to the Flood (cf. Luke 12:45-47). The fact is, it was the little, routine "responsibilities of life" that hindered the people of Noah's day from responding to God's warning, and so it is with Christians today:
Listen dear brothers and sisters in the Lord, none of these things - "eating," "drinking," "marrying" and "giving in marriage" - are "bad things." They're not sins; they're the legitimate "responsibilities of life" - but, again, it was precisely these things that prevented the people of Noah's time from responding to God's warning; and it is exactly these things that are hindering Christians today.
[We URGE you to take the time to read our article, "Kafka: Der Prozess or 'The Trial'."] -- Antipas |
God
help you if you are letting these kinds of things prevent
you from taking action now. The people of Noah's day weren't
spared, and I somberly warn you (no! - not I but the Lord)
neither will you be spared either. As I said in the New
Antipas Papers:_______________________________________
Strange things are happening in the United States these days, and every day seems to bring additional scary news. The similarity to the erosion of civil liberties in Germany during the 1930s is a bit too close for comfort. Many will regard this statement as hyperbole. But let's take a close look at what is going on before we dismiss the comparison.
In terms of the historical record for Germany, legal discrimination against Jews certainly existed before the Nuremberg Laws of 1935, and grew steadily over time. There was always a feeling in the Jewish community—most of whom regarded themselves as Germans, after all—that "OK, that's the worst of it." Hence, the decision to stay. Then came the next set of restrictions, and again the response: "This is as far as it will go." It was like the classic experiment of turning up the heat on frogs placed in warm water. Gradually, they get boiled to death, because the increase of heat is incremental. It was only toward the end of the thirties that the choice began to look like: jump or die. Finally, it became simply, die.
 |
There was always a feeling in the German Jewish community-most of whom regarded themselves as Germans, after all-that "OK, that's the worst of it." Hence, the decision to stay. Then came the next set of restrictions, and again the response: "This is as far as it will go." It was like the classic experiment of turning up the heat on frogs placed in warm water. Gradually, they get boiled to death, because the increase of heat is incremental. It was only toward the end of the thirties that the choice began to look like: jump or die. Finally, it became simply, die. |
-
In 1933, the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service banned "non-Aryans" from the civil service.
-
In 1935, the Nuremberg Laws deprived Jews of German citizenship and prohibited marriage between Jews and "Aryans." They also prohibited sexual intercourse between Jews and "Aryans," and the employment of "Aryan" females under forty-five years of age as domestic workers in Jewish households. In addition, Jews could not work as lawyers, doctors, or journalists; could not use state hospitals; and could not be educated by the state past the age of fourteen. They could not enter public parks, libraries, or beaches, and could not receive winnings from the national lottery.
-
In 1938, Jews with first names that were not characteristically Jewish had to adopt the middle name Sara (if female) or David (if male). Passports of German Jews were stamped with a "J".
-
In 1939, Jews living in German-occupied Poland had to wear the yellow star. This was extended to all Jews living within Nazi-controlled areas in 1941.
By way of comparison, one thing that makes me particularly
nervous is what has been called the "conspiracy of silence."
Almost nobody spoke up in Germany as this process was 
unfolding,
and the American public has been similarly
silent about the events documented below. Indeed,
I would venture to say that 98% of the American public (maybe
more) is unaware of events such as these, or of the passage
of repressive legislation, and that they wouldn't care even
if they did know about it. ("Hey, I ain't no Ay-rab!") The classic
quote that has come down to us is from Martin Niemoeller, a
German pastor and theologian who wound up in the Sachsenhausen
and Dachau concentration camps (he was liberated by the Allies
in 1945). It goes something like this:
"First they came for the communists, but I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist. Then they came for the trade unionists, but I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, but I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for me, but by that time there was no one left to speak out."
It is no accident that Chris Hedges entitled a recent article "First They Come for the Muslims" (see below, Item 4). God forbid something like that might happen in the U.S., but the signs of a gradual slide towards Nuremberg, and concomitant citizen apathy, are very much present in the current political milieu. Let's have a look at what has been going on in the decade since 9/11. I'm going to discuss the following topics:
|
-
The creation of a political climate in which the police are out of control, arbitrarily free to intimidate anyone for virtually anything.
The evidence for this is perforce anecdotal, but events such as the ones discussed below are getting to be so common that we have to keep in mind that when you have accumulated enough anecdotes, the result is called "data."
-
In
June 2011 the sheriff of Nelson County, North Dakota,
called in a Predator B drone from the local Air Force
base to capture three men who had stolen some cows.
Once the unmanned aircraft located the suspects, police
rushed in to make the first known arrests of U.S. citizens
with the help of a Predator spy drone. It turns out
that predator drones are frequently used for domestic
investigations all over the U.S.—by the FBI,
the Drug Enforcement Administration, and by state and
local law enforcement officials.
-
In July 2011 police in a small town in Georgia shut down a lemonade stand being run by three girls, ages 10-14, who were trying to save up for a trip to a local water park. The police said that they didn't know what was in the lemonade; and in addition, that the girls needed a business license, a peddler's permit, and a food permit in order to run the stand. The permits, by the way, cost $50 a day.
-
In January 2012 the library system of Charlton, Massachusetts, called the police to collect some overdue books charged to Hailey Benoit—a five-year-old girl.
-
Also in January 2012, a young couple was arrested in Baltimore for asking a police woman directions to highway I-95. They spent the night in jail.
-
In
April 2012 the Supreme Court ruled that jail authorities
may strip search people arrested for minor offenses
before they are jailed while awaiting a hearing. Individuals
have been strip searched for offenses such as biking
with an inaudible bell, walking a dog without a leash,
and driving with a noisy muffler. The sexual humiliation
involved in these searches, writes Naomi Wolf, is clearly
a way of keeping the masses in line, politically docile.
How long, she asks, before saying anything controversial
online or on the phone (see Item 3, below) will result
in the "guilty" party facing arrest and sexual humiliation?
I think we need to pause a moment before we summarily
dismiss this as paranoia.
-
-
The persecution of whistleblowers, protesters, and dissenters
This has been going on throughout the past decade, first under President Bush, and then more aggressively under President Obama. According to the New Yorker, "the Obama Administration has pursued leak prosecutions with a surprising relentlessness." To which the New York Times added: "In 17 months in office, President Obama has already outdone every previous president in pursuing leak prosecutions." In the famous case of Bradley Manning, who revealed government documents to Wikileaks, Mr. Obama publicly declared him guilty before he went to trial or was convicted of a crime. The overall result is that the government has basically criminalized public servants who speak out to expose waste or corruption or unethical behavior. Whistleblowing and dissent have, in themselves, become criminal activities.
-
Since 2006 the filmmaker Laura Poitras, who made a documentary about the U.S. occupation of Iraq, has been detained and questioned at airports more than forty times. Government agents confiscate her computer and notebooks without a warrant. She is hardly an isolated case. With no oversight or legal framework for its activities, the Department of Homeland Security routinely singles out individuals who are suspected of no crimes, detains them at the airport when they return to the U.S. from an international trip, and then seizes their laptops, cameras, cellphones, notebooks, and credit card receipts.
Laura Poitras
-
William Binney, an intelligence official who worked for the NSA for nearly forty years, resigned in October 2001 when massive domestic spying became the norm. Binney and several other
NSA officials reported their concerns about this to Congress and the Department of Defense. In 2006, he exposed the NSA practice of installing secret monitoring rooms in major U.S. telecommunications facilities. Finally, in 2007, a dozen FBI agents charged into his house with guns drawn, pointed their weapons at his head, and interrogated him at length. Three other ex-NSA employees were raided the same day.
William Binney
-
You can now go to jail in the United States simply for speaking. In July 2011, environmental activist Tim DeChristopher was sentenced to two years in prison for his repeated declaration that environmental protection required civil—i.e.,
nonviolent—disobedience. One wonders if the same judge, Dee Benson, would have also put Rosa Parks and Mahatma Gandhi in jail, had he been around during their lifetimes.
Tim DeChristopher
-
In March 2012 the president signed H.R. 347, the so-called trespass bill, into law, which allows the government to jail anyone protesting near someone with Secret Service protection for up to ten years. This makes it quite easy for the government to criminalize protest per se, because the exclusion zones defined by the law have no clear boundaries. In fact, they can be as large as the law wants them to be; which means that the free speech zone is a moving target.
-
-
The dramatic expansion of the surveillance of American citizens on the part of the National Security Agency (NSA)
-
On 19 July 2010 the Washington Post reported that 854,000 people work for the National Security Agency in thirty-three building complexes amounting to 17 million square feet of space, in the DC Metro and suburban area. Every day, collection systems at the NSA intercept and store 1.7 billion emails and phone calls of American citizens, in what amounts to a vast domestic spy system. Writing in the New Yorker on 23 May 2011, Jane Mayer reported that the NSA has three times the budget of the CIA, and has the capacity to download, every six hours, electronic communications equivalent to the entire contents of the Library of Congress. They also developed a program called Thin Thread that enables computers to scan the material for key words, and they collect the billing records and the dialed phone numbers of everyone in the country. In violation of communications laws, ATT, Verizon, and BellSouth have opened their electronic records to the government. At the height of its insanity, the Stasi in East Germany was spying on 1 out of 7 citizens. The U.S. is now spying on 7 out of 7.
-
To make the surveillance of American
citizens even more comprehensive (assuming that is even
possible), the NSA is currently building the biggest-ever
data complex in Bluffdale, Utah, as part of a secret
surveillance program code-named "Stellar Wind." The
center, scheduled for completion in 2013, will be twice
as large as the U.S. Capitol, and contain 100,000 square
feet of computer space, at a cost of $2 billion. In
addition, the NSA has established listening posts throughout
the country as part of this operation. All in all, there
are now 1,271 government agencies and 1,931 private
companies that work on programs related to counterterrorism
and homeland security in about 10,000 locations across
the U.S. The goal is to store and review the e-mails,
phone calls, online shopping lists, and virtually every
bit of information about every single American. Everything
you do, from traveling to buying groceries, will be
displayed on a graph. William Binney (see above, Item
2) has stated that we are about two millimeters away
"from a turnkey totalitarian state."
-
-
The corruption of the judicial system by means of show trials of Muslim activists
This was discussed at length by Chris Hedges on truthdig, 16 April 2012. That very week, Tarek Mehanna, a U.S. citizen, was sentenced to 17½ years in prison. He was convicted of conspiring to kill American soldiers in Iraq and giving material support to al-Qaeda. No proof of these charges was provided. What seems to have been the more relevant issue is that Mehanna had spoken out against U.S. foreign policy, and had refused to become a government informant.
These types of trials have been going on since 9/11. In them, federal lawyers are allowed to prosecute people on "evidence" that the defendants are not allowed to see. Stephen Downs, a lawyer who has defended Muslim activists since 2006, has documented the phony charges used to label these people as terrorists and then put them behind bars, typically for long stretches of time. He told Hedges:
"People who have committed no crime are taken into custody, isolated without adequate recourse to legal advice, railroaded with fake or contrived charges, and 'disappeared' into prisons designed to isolate them."
Basically, they are condemned before they have committed a crime, in a process that Downs calls "pre-emptive prosecution."
Downs discovered all this in 2006, when Yassin Aref, the imam of a mosque in Albany, New York, was entrapped in a government sting operation. What then happened, he told Hedges, was that the government -
"... put together a case that was just one lie piled on top of another lie, and when you pointed it out to them they didn't care. They didn't refute it. They knew it was a lie....But the facts are irrelevant. The government has decided to target these people." Essentially, he went on, the government lawyers "must know they're prosecuting people before a crime has been committed based on what they think the defendant might do in the future."
These are, in other words, kangaroo courts.
The bottom line, of course, is that if you destroy the judicial system, then finally nobody is safe. The government could wind up railroading anyone they don't like, and I very much doubt that this possibility is far-fetched. First they came for the Muslims...
-
The construction of political detention centers, also known as Communication Management Units (CMU's)
Where do the suspected Muslim terrorists go? It turns out that the government is using secret prison facilities to house inmates accused of non-violent activities, i.e. of allegedly being tied to terrorist groups. As it turns out, these are not just Muslim groups; the CMU's are also being used to house environmental activists. The first CMU was built in 2006 in Terre Haute, Indiana; in 2008 a second facility was constructed in Marion, Illinois. Restrictions on contact with the outside world are quite severe—for example, having all phone calls monitored and limited to fifteen minutes per week. Among the so-called terrorists housed in these units are the following:
Following a major feature on NPR, covering the little-known Communications Management Units (CMUs), located in Terre Haute, Indiana, and Marion, Illinois, where the inmates are mostly Muslims, who are subjected to surveillance 24 hours a day, have their mail monitored, and are prevented from having any physical contact whatsoever with their families during prison visits.
-
Rafil Dhafir, an Iraqi-born oncologist from Syracuse, New York, who created a charity called Help the Needy to provide food and medicine to the people of Iraq who had been suffering from U.S. economic sanctions. He was sentenced to twenty-two years in prison for violating those sanctions. (I cite some of these in Dark Ages America; they include a ban on the importation of medicine and toilet paper.)
-
Daniel McGowan, an environmental activist
who committed two acts of arson to protest logging in
the Pacific Northwest, was sentenced to seven years.
He was not convicted of any terrorist crime or being
affiliated with any terrorist group, although the government
claimed that he was a member of the Earth Liberation
Front, which they regard as a domestic terrorist organization.
One thing that did not help was his public visibility,
both through media appearances and his website.
-
Andrew Stepanian, recently released—the first prisoner ever to be released from a CMU. He spent three years in jail, which included six and a half months at the Marion facility, for trying to shut down an animal testing laboratory. He was then put under house arrest in New York. In fact, he was not accused of any violent crime or property destruction.
What distinguishes the CMU's from other jails is that they are political prisons. All of the defendants are incarcerated there for what appear to be ideological reasons. Meanwhile, the definition of "terrorist" continues to grow (see below, Item 6); it won't necessarily stop with Muslims or environmental rights activists. Significantly, the word "ecoterrorism" was coined by corporations in the early 1980s. The CMU's even contain antiwar tax protesters. In general, the legal wall separating "terrorist" from "dissident" is starting to break down, if, indeed, it hasn't already.
-
-
The
shredding of the Bill of Rights by means of the National
Defense Authorization Act The NDAA, also known as the "indefinite detention bill," was signed into law by President Obama on 31 December 2011. It has no temporal or geographic limitations, and can be used by Mr. Obama or any future president to military detain U.S. citizens. As in pre-Magna Carta days, you can simply be swept up and put away forever—disappeared—with no explanation of why, no right to call a lawyer or anybody else, and no right to a trial. You can actually be tortured to death, if the government decides it is in the national interest. The NDAA is probably the greatest rollback of civil liberties in the history of the United States. Under the Act, literally anyone can be described as a "belligerent," or as they are now called, "covered person." The president claimed that he signed the bill only to provide funding for American troops, and that he had been reluctant to sign it because it included American citizens. This b.s. was subsequently exposed by one of the bill's sponsors, Senator Carl Levin, who revealed that it was Mr. Obama himself who insisted that the indefinite detention clause include U.S. citizens. Meanwhile, the White House had been conducting a misinformation campaign to secure this incredible dictatorial power while portraying the president as some type of reluctant absolute ruler. It is also important to note that there was virtually no coverage of this issue on the part of the mainstream media. In effect, as Naomi Wolf has written, the U.S. "is sleepwalking into become a police state." The New American website posted the following comment on the new law:
"The universe of potential 'covered persons' includes every citizen of the United States of America. Any American could one day find himself or herself branded a 'belligerent' and thus subject to the complete confiscation of his or her constitutional civil liberties and nearly never-ending incarceration in a military prison."
You don't have to be convicted of terrorism to be rounded up, under this new law; you only have to be suspected of terrorist activity. And as Senator Rand Paul pointed out prior to the passage of the bill, the Department of Justice now has a list of "identifying characteristics" of terrorists that includes –
-
having one or more fingers missing from your hands;
-
having more than seven days' worth of food in your house;
-
and having a loaded weapon on your property
—which describes half the households in the United States. In effect, with the NDAA, if the government, for any reason, doesn't like you—for example, if you are simply a critic of the U.S., nothing more—they can brand you a terrorist and put you away forever, with literally no one knowing what happened to you.
Note also that even before the passage of this law, the president had the legal right, even though it violates the Geneva accords, to designate anyone on the planet an enemy, and have him or her assassinated. Thus on 30 September 2011, Mr. Obama had two American citizens, Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan, assassinated because of suspected—i.e. not proven—al-Qaeda membership and terrorist activity. Two weeks later, the CIA killed al-Awlaki's sixteen-year-old son. The real problem in these cases is not whether these people were actually guilty of terrorism; it's that the Constitution says that no matter how heinous the crime, every American citizen has a right to his or her day in court. If I remember correctly, it does not say that the president has the right to rub them out without a trial.
Just as an aside, there are, in general, more people under "correctional supervision" in America than there were in the Russian gulag under Stalin, at its height. Writing in the New Yorker on 30 January 2012, Adam Gopnik declared:
"Mass incarceration on a scale almost unexampled in human history is a fundamental fact of our country today."
-
-
Future scenarios: The "disappearing" of intellectual critics of the U.S. government?
This leads me to my final point. The distinctive characteristic of American democracy, from 1776, was the protection of the individual and the preservation of individual rights. That no longer exists. Anyone is a potential terrorist now; anyone can be persecuted, prosecuted, and in effect, destroyed. Democracy is only possible if dissent is not only permitted, but also respected. This too is finished. What does this mean for someone such as myself?, is something I lay awake nights thinking about. I have published three books, and half a collection of essays, showing where we have gone wrong, predicting our eventual collapse—indeed, this repression is part of that collapse—and arguing that the U.S. no longer has a moral compass; that it is spiritually bankrupt. I run a blog that is anything but polite: it says the U.S. is finished; that it is essentially a corporate plutocracy, run by a gangster elite; that the American people are basically morons, with little more than fried rice in their heads; and that anyone with half a brain and the means to do so should emigrate before it's too late. I'm not really a threat to the U.S. government, largely because I am not a political activist and because it's not likely that more than 74 people out of 311 million regularly read my blog (it's probably more like 24, in fact). But as the definition of terrorism widens in this country, what is to prevent the creation of a category known as "intellectual terrorism" from arising, and putting folks like myself in that category? What is to prevent the government from calling such activity a clear and present danger to national security?
Morris Berman
As must be obvious by now, the government can do anything it wants to; as in Nazi Germany, we now have a government of men, not of laws. Indeed, the "laws" are little more than a pretext for whatever the government wishes to do.
Is the following scenario completely paranoid? Five or ten years down the line, as I fly into the DFW Airport en route to giving a lecture somewhere, or simply visiting friends, I am suddenly surrounded by government agents, whisked off to a holding cell, and eventually sent to Guantanamo. Nobody knows what happened to me, and I'm not allowed to phone anyone—not my lawyer, not a friend, and certainly not Chris Hedges, who is probably being tortured in the adjoining cell. Two points to remember here, historically speaking:
-
When a country puts laws such as torture
or indefinite detention or arbitrary assassination on
the books, sooner or later it will use these legal instruments.
They won't just lie dormant, in other words. As in the
case of technology, once the mechanisms are there, the
temptation to employ them simply becomes too great to
resist. That is what is happening today.
-
In a world that is politically construed along Manichaean lines—which, as I have argued elsewhere, America has been doing since Day 1—the first line of attack is against the enemy outside. It doesn't matter if we are talking about Protestants or Catholics or al-Qaeda operatives or infidels of any kind, the first order of business is to go to war with them. But as the British anthropologist Mary Douglas shows in her book Purity and Danger, or Norman Cohn demonstrates in The Pursuit of the Millennium, if the war goes on long enough, inevitably the enemy is also seen to be a fifth column, i.e. within the walls of the body politic itself. They become Huguenots or Marrano Jews or heretics of whatever stripe, and as in the case of Goya's famous painting, Saturn Devouring His Son, the country begins to eat itself alive. Everybody becomes an enemy; no one is safe any longer. And so I believe that I, and you, really do have reason to worry.
-
We are not marching to Pretoria; rather, we are slouching towards Nuremberg. To quote Edward R. Murrow,
"Good Night, and Good Luck."
|
________________________________________
God bless you all!
S.R. Shearer
Antipas Ministries
***
IN ADDITION, WE URGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD THE NEW ANTIPAS PAPERS, PRINT THEM OUT YOURSELF, AND STUDY THEM CAREFULLY; SHARE THEM WITH YOUR FRIENDS.
YOU MAY DOWNLOAD THEM FREE!
***
FINALLY, WE URGE YOU TO DOWNLOAD AND PRINT OUT THE FLYER WE SENT TO YOU RECENTLY.
YOU MAY DOWNLOAD THE FLYER HERE
Then make copies and take these copies out to the campuses where you live; pass them out; OR if that seems too "daring" for you right now, post them on telephone poles, the sides of buildings, on campus bulletin boards; post them in union halls, in the neighborhoods of the poor and downtrodden, near employment offices, wherever you can.
Once again, we URGE you to read (or re-read):